AOTree: Aspect Order Tree-based Model for Explainable Recommendation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.19937v2
• Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 05:40:20 GMT
• Title: AOTree: Aspect Order Tree-based Model for Explainable Recommendation
• Authors: Wenxin Zhao, Peng Zhang, Hansu Gu, Dongsheng Li, Tun Lu, Ning Gu,
• Abstract summary: We propose Aspect Order Tree-based (AOTree) explainable recommendation method, inspired by the Order Effects Theory from cognitive and decision psychology. Our method aligns more consistently with the user's decision-making process by displaying explanations in a particular order, thereby enhancing interpretability.
• Score: 24.065684646927927
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recent recommender systems aim to provide not only accurate recommendations but also explanations that help users understand them better. However, most existing explainable recommendations only consider the importance of content in reviews, such as words or aspects, and ignore the ordering relationship among them. This oversight neglects crucial ordering dimensions in the human decision-making process, leading to suboptimal performance. Therefore, in this paper, we propose Aspect Order Tree-based (AOTree) explainable recommendation method, inspired by the Order Effects Theory from cognitive and decision psychology, in order to capture the dependency relationships among decisive factors. We first validate the theory in the recommendation scenario by analyzing the reviews of the users. Then, according to the theory, the proposed AOTree expands the construction of the decision tree to capture aspect orders in users' decision-making processes, and use attention mechanisms to make predictions based on the aspect orders. Extensive experiments demonstrate our method's effectiveness on rating predictions, and our approach aligns more consistently with the user' s decision-making process by displaying explanations in a particular order, thereby enhancing interpretability.

Related papers

• Counterfactual Language Reasoning for Explainable Recommendation Systems [36.76537906002456]
  This paper introduces a novel framework integrating structural causal models with large language models to establish causal consistency in recommendation pipelines. Our methodology enforces explanation factors as causal antecedents to recommendation predictions through causal graph construction and counterfactual adjustment. We demonstrate that CausalX achieves superior performance in recommendation accuracy, explanation plausibility, and bias mitigation compared to baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T05:15:37Z)
• Learning Deep Tree-based Retriever for Efficient Recommendation: Theory and Method [76.31185707649227]
  We propose a Deep Tree-based Retriever (DTR) for efficient recommendation. DTR frames the training task as a softmax-based multi-class classification over tree nodes at the same level. To mitigate the suboptimality induced by the labeling of non-leaf nodes, we propose a rectification method for the loss function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T05:09:53Z)
• Aligning Explanations for Recommendation with Rating and Feature via Maximizing Mutual Information [29.331050754362803]
  Current explanation generation methods are commonly trained with an objective to mimic existing user reviews. We propose a flexible model-agnostic method named MMI framework to enhance the alignment between the generated natural language explanations and the predicted rating/important item features. Our MMI framework can boost different backbone models, enabling them to outperform existing baselines in terms of alignment with predicted ratings and item features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T08:29:55Z)
• Understanding Before Recommendation: Semantic Aspect-Aware Review Exploitation via Large Language Models [53.337728969143086]
  Recommendation systems harness user-item interactions like clicks and reviews to learn their representations. Previous studies improve recommendation accuracy and interpretability by modeling user preferences across various aspects and intents. We introduce a chain-based prompting approach to uncover semantic aspect-aware interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-26T15:44:09Z)
• Explainable Recommender with Geometric Information Bottleneck [25.703872435370585]
  We propose to incorporate a geometric prior learnt from user-item interactions into a variational network. Latent factors from an individual user-item pair can be used for both recommendation and explanation generation. Experimental results on three e-commerce datasets show that our model significantly improves the interpretability of a variational recommender.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-09T10:38:36Z)
• Causal Disentangled Variational Auto-Encoder for Preference Understanding in Recommendation [50.93536377097659]
  This paper introduces the Causal Disentangled Variational Auto-Encoder (CaD-VAE), a novel approach for learning causal disentangled representations from interaction data in recommender systems. The approach utilizes structural causal models to generate causal representations that describe the causal relationship between latent factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T00:10:56Z)
• Justification of Recommender Systems Results: A Service-based Approach [4.640835690336653]
  We propose a novel justification approach that uses service models to extract experience data from reviews concerning all the stages of interaction with items. In a user study, we compared our approach with baselines reflecting the state of the art in the justification of recommender systems results. Our models received higher Interface Adequacy and Satisfaction evaluations by users having different levels of Curiosity or low Need for Cognition (NfC) These findings encourage the adoption of service models to justify recommender systems results but suggest the investigation of personalization strategies to suit diverse interaction needs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-07T11:08:19Z)
• Ordinal Graph Gamma Belief Network for Social Recommender Systems [54.9487910312535]
  We develop a hierarchical Bayesian model termed ordinal graph factor analysis (OGFA), which jointly models user-item and user-user interactions. OGFA not only achieves good recommendation performance, but also extracts interpretable latent factors corresponding to representative user preferences. We extend OGFA to ordinal graph gamma belief network, which is a multi-stochastic-layer deep probabilistic model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-12T09:19:22Z)
• Breaking Feedback Loops in Recommender Systems with Causal Inference [99.22185950608838]
  Recent work has shown that feedback loops may compromise recommendation quality and homogenize user behavior. We propose the Causal Adjustment for Feedback Loops (CAFL), an algorithm that provably breaks feedback loops using causal inference. We show that CAFL improves recommendation quality when compared to prior correction methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T17:58:39Z)
• Counterfactual Explainable Recommendation [22.590877963169103]
  We propose Counterfactual Explainable Recommendation (CountER), which takes the insights of counterfactual reasoning from causal inference for explainable recommendation. CountER seeks simple (low complexity) and effective (high strength) explanations for the model decision. Results show that our model generates more accurate and effective explanations than state-of-the-art explainable recommendation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-24T06:37:57Z)
• Learning Post-Hoc Causal Explanations for Recommendation [43.300372759620664]
  We propose to extract causal rules from the user interaction history as post-hoc explanations for the black-box sequential recommendation mechanisms. Our approach achieves counterfactual examples with the aid of a perturbation model, and then extracts personalized causal relationships for the recommendation model. Experiments are conducted on several state-of-the-art sequential recommendation models and real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-30T17:14:12Z)
• Evaluations and Methods for Explanation through Robustness Analysis [117.7235152610957]
  We establish a novel set of evaluation criteria for such feature based explanations by analysis. We obtain new explanations that are loosely necessary and sufficient for a prediction. We extend the explanation to extract the set of features that would move the current prediction to a target class.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-31T05:52:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.