Social and Ethical Risks Posed by General-Purpose LLMs for Settling Newcomers in Canada

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.20240v2
• Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 19:44:38 GMT
• Title: Social and Ethical Risks Posed by General-Purpose LLMs for Settling Newcomers in Canada
• Authors: Isar Nejadgholi, Maryam Molamohammadi, Samir Bakhtawar,
• Abstract summary: General-purpose generative AI might become a common practice among newcomers and service providers to address this need. These tools are not tailored for the settlement domain and can have detrimental implications for immigrants and refugees. We explore the risks that these tools might pose on newcomers to first, warn against the unguarded use of generative AI, and second, to incentivize further research and development in creating AI literacy programs.
• Score: 6.056177220363428
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The non-profit settlement sector in Canada supports newcomers in achieving successful integration. This sector faces increasing operational pressures amidst rising immigration targets, which highlights a need for enhanced efficiency and innovation, potentially through reliable AI solutions. The ad-hoc use of general-purpose generative AI, such as ChatGPT, might become a common practice among newcomers and service providers to address this need. However, these tools are not tailored for the settlement domain and can have detrimental implications for immigrants and refugees. We explore the risks that these tools might pose on newcomers to first, warn against the unguarded use of generative AI, and second, to incentivize further research and development in creating AI literacy programs as well as customized LLMs that are aligned with the preferences of the impacted communities. Crucially, such technologies should be designed to integrate seamlessly into the existing workflow of the settlement sector, ensuring human oversight, trustworthiness, and accountability.

Related papers

• Engineering Trustworthy AI: A Developer Guide for Empirical Risk Minimization [53.80919781981027]
  Key requirements for trustworthy AI can be translated into design choices for the components of empirical risk minimization. We hope to provide actionable guidance for building AI systems that meet emerging standards for trustworthiness of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T07:53:32Z)
• Human-Centered AI Applications for Canada's Immigration Settlement Sector [5.5437761853813665]
  This paper emphasizes the potential of AI in Canada's immigration settlement phase. By highlighting the settlement sector as a prime candidate for reliable AI applications, we demonstrate its unique capacity to empower immigrants directly. We outline a vision for human-centred and responsible AI solutions that facilitate the integration of newcomers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-02T20:52:11Z)
• How Could Generative AI Support Compliance with the EU AI Act? A Review for Safe Automated Driving Perception [4.075971633195745]
  Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have become central for the perception functions of autonomous vehicles. The European Union (EU) Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act aims to address these challenges by establishing stringent norms and standards for AI systems. This review paper summarizes the requirements arising from the EU AI Act regarding DNN-based perception systems and systematically categorizes existing generative AI applications in AD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-30T12:01:06Z)
• LLM-Driven Robots Risk Enacting Discrimination, Violence, and Unlawful Actions [3.1247504290622214]
  Research has raised concerns about the potential for Large Language Models to produce discriminatory outcomes and unsafe behaviors in real-world robot experiments and applications. We conduct an HRI-based evaluation of discrimination and safety criteria on several highly-rated LLMs. Our results underscore the urgent need for systematic, routine, and comprehensive risk assessments and assurances to improve outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T05:31:49Z)
• Risks and Opportunities of Open-Source Generative AI [64.86989162783648]
  Applications of Generative AI (Gen AI) are expected to revolutionize a number of different areas, ranging from science & medicine to education. The potential for these seismic changes has triggered a lively debate about the potential risks of the technology, and resulted in calls for tighter regulation. This regulation is likely to put at risk the budding field of open-source generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-14T13:37:36Z)
• Socialized Learning: A Survey of the Paradigm Shift for Edge Intelligence in Networked Systems [62.252355444948904]
  This paper presents the findings of a literature review on the integration of edge intelligence (EI) and socialized learning (SL) SL is a learning paradigm predicated on social principles and behaviors, aimed at amplifying the collaborative capacity and collective intelligence of agents. We elaborate on three integrated components: socialized architecture, socialized training, and socialized inference, analyzing their strengths and weaknesses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-20T11:07:29Z)
• Large language models in 6G security: challenges and opportunities [5.073128025996496]
  We focus on the security aspects of Large Language Models (LLMs) from the viewpoint of potential adversaries. This will include the development of a comprehensive threat taxonomy, categorizing various adversary behaviors. Also, our research will concentrate on how LLMs can be integrated into cybersecurity efforts by defense teams, also known as blue teams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T20:39:34Z)
• A Safe Harbor for AI Evaluation and Red Teaming [124.89885800509505]
  Some researchers fear that conducting such research or releasing their findings will result in account suspensions or legal reprisal. We propose that major AI developers commit to providing a legal and technical safe harbor. We believe these commitments are a necessary step towards more inclusive and unimpeded community efforts to tackle the risks of generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T20:55:08Z)
• Prioritizing Safeguarding Over Autonomy: Risks of LLM Agents for Science [65.77763092833348]
  Intelligent agents powered by large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated substantial promise in autonomously conducting experiments and facilitating scientific discoveries across various disciplines. While their capabilities are promising, these agents also introduce novel vulnerabilities that demand careful consideration for safety. This paper conducts a thorough examination of vulnerabilities in LLM-based agents within scientific domains, shedding light on potential risks associated with their misuse and emphasizing the need for safety measures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T18:54:07Z)
• Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
  We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems. There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them. Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.