A Model Generalization Study in Localizing Indoor Cows with COw LOcalization (COLO) dataset
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.20372v1
- Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 18:49:58 GMT
- Title: A Model Generalization Study in Localizing Indoor Cows with COw LOcalization (COLO) dataset
- Authors: Mautushi Das, Gonzalo Ferreira, C. P. James Chen,
- Abstract summary: This study investigates the generalization capabilities of YOLOv8 and YOLOv9 models for cow detection in indoor free-stall barn settings.
We explore three key hypotheses: (1) Model generalization is equally influenced by changes in lighting conditions and camera angles; (2) Higher model complexity guarantees better generalization performance; (3) Fine-tuning with custom initial weights trained on relevant tasks always brings advantages to detection tasks.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Precision livestock farming (PLF) increasingly relies on advanced object localization techniques to monitor livestock health and optimize resource management. This study investigates the generalization capabilities of YOLOv8 and YOLOv9 models for cow detection in indoor free-stall barn settings, focusing on varying training data characteristics such as view angles and lighting, and model complexities. Leveraging the newly released public dataset, COws LOcalization (COLO) dataset, we explore three key hypotheses: (1) Model generalization is equally influenced by changes in lighting conditions and camera angles; (2) Higher model complexity guarantees better generalization performance; (3) Fine-tuning with custom initial weights trained on relevant tasks always brings advantages to detection tasks. Our findings reveal considerable challenges in detecting cows in images taken from side views and underscore the importance of including diverse camera angles in building a detection model. Furthermore, our results emphasize that higher model complexity does not necessarily lead to better performance. The optimal model configuration heavily depends on the specific task and dataset. Lastly, while fine-tuning with custom initial weights trained on relevant tasks offers advantages to detection tasks, simpler models do not benefit similarly from this approach. It is more efficient to train a simple model with pre-trained weights without relying on prior relevant information, which can require intensive labor efforts. Future work should focus on adaptive methods and advanced data augmentation to improve generalization and robustness. This study provides practical guidelines for PLF researchers on deploying computer vision models from existing studies, highlights generalization issues, and contributes the COLO dataset containing 1254 images and 11818 cow instances for further research.
Related papers
- Scaling Laws for Task-Optimized Models of the Primate Visual Ventral Stream [3.4526439922541705]
We evaluate scaling laws for modeling the primate visual ventral stream (VVS)
We observe that while behavioral alignment continues to scale with larger models, neural alignment saturates.
Increased scaling is especially beneficial for higher-level visual areas, where small models trained on few samples exhibit only poor alignment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-08T17:13:53Z) - Adaptive Masking Enhances Visual Grounding [12.793586888511978]
We propose IMAGE, Interpretative MAsking with Gaussian radiation modEling, to enhance vocabulary grounding in low-shot learning scenarios.
We evaluate the efficacy of our approach on benchmark datasets, including COCO and ODinW, demonstrating its superior performance in zero-shot and few-shot tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-04T05:48:02Z) - Fantastic Gains and Where to Find Them: On the Existence and Prospect of
General Knowledge Transfer between Any Pretrained Model [74.62272538148245]
We show that for arbitrary pairings of pretrained models, one model extracts significant data context unavailable in the other.
We investigate if it is possible to transfer such "complementary" knowledge from one model to another without performance degradation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-26T17:59:46Z) - ALP: Action-Aware Embodied Learning for Perception [60.64801970249279]
We introduce Action-Aware Embodied Learning for Perception (ALP)
ALP incorporates action information into representation learning through a combination of optimizing a reinforcement learning policy and an inverse dynamics prediction objective.
We show that ALP outperforms existing baselines in several downstream perception tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-16T21:51:04Z) - Universal Domain Adaptation from Foundation Models: A Baseline Study [58.51162198585434]
We make empirical studies of state-of-the-art UniDA methods using foundation models.
We introduce textitCLIP distillation, a parameter-free method specifically designed to distill target knowledge from CLIP models.
Although simple, our method outperforms previous approaches in most benchmark tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-18T16:28:29Z) - Are Sample-Efficient NLP Models More Robust? [90.54786862811183]
We investigate the relationship between sample efficiency (amount of data needed to reach a given ID accuracy) and robustness (how models fare on OOD evaluation)
We find that higher sample efficiency is only correlated with better average OOD robustness on some modeling interventions and tasks, but not others.
These results suggest that general-purpose methods for improving sample efficiency are unlikely to yield universal OOD robustness improvements, since such improvements are highly dataset- and task-dependent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-12T17:54:59Z) - StyleGAN-Human: A Data-Centric Odyssey of Human Generation [96.7080874757475]
This work takes a data-centric perspective and investigates multiple critical aspects in "data engineering"
We collect and annotate a large-scale human image dataset with over 230K samples capturing diverse poses and textures.
We rigorously investigate three essential factors in data engineering for StyleGAN-based human generation, namely data size, data distribution, and data alignment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-25T17:55:08Z) - SuperAnimal pretrained pose estimation models for behavioral analysis [42.206265576708255]
Quantification of behavior is critical in applications ranging from neuroscience, veterinary medicine and animal conservation efforts.
We present a series of technical innovations that enable a new method, collectively called SuperAnimal, to develop unified foundation models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-14T18:46:57Z) - Complementary Ensemble Learning [1.90365714903665]
We derive a technique to improve performance of state-of-the-art deep learning models.
Specifically, we train auxiliary models which are able to complement state-of-the-art model uncertainty.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-09T03:23:05Z) - Models, Pixels, and Rewards: Evaluating Design Trade-offs in Visual
Model-Based Reinforcement Learning [109.74041512359476]
We study a number of design decisions for the predictive model in visual MBRL algorithms.
We find that a range of design decisions that are often considered crucial, such as the use of latent spaces, have little effect on task performance.
We show how this phenomenon is related to exploration and how some of the lower-scoring models on standard benchmarks will perform the same as the best-performing models when trained on the same training data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-08T18:03:21Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.