Vision-Language Model Based Handwriting Verification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.21788v1
• Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 17:57:32 GMT
• Title: Vision-Language Model Based Handwriting Verification
• Authors: Mihir Chauhan, Abhishek Satbhai, Mohammad Abuzar Hashemi, Mir Basheer Ali, Bina Ramamurthy, Mingchen Gao, Siwei Lyu, Sargur Srihari,
• Abstract summary: This paper explores using Vision Language Models (VLMs), such as OpenAI's GPT-4o and Google's PaliGemma, to address these challenges. Our goal is to provide clear, human-understandable explanations for model decisions.
• Score: 23.983430206133793
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Handwriting Verification is a critical in document forensics. Deep learning based approaches often face skepticism from forensic document examiners due to their lack of explainability and reliance on extensive training data and handcrafted features. This paper explores using Vision Language Models (VLMs), such as OpenAI's GPT-4o and Google's PaliGemma, to address these challenges. By leveraging their Visual Question Answering capabilities and 0-shot Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning, our goal is to provide clear, human-understandable explanations for model decisions. Our experiments on the CEDAR handwriting dataset demonstrate that VLMs offer enhanced interpretability, reduce the need for large training datasets, and adapt better to diverse handwriting styles. However, results show that the CNN-based ResNet-18 architecture outperforms the 0-shot CoT prompt engineering approach with GPT-4o (Accuracy: 70%) and supervised fine-tuned PaliGemma (Accuracy: 71%), achieving an accuracy of 84% on the CEDAR AND dataset. These findings highlight the potential of VLMs in generating human-interpretable decisions while underscoring the need for further advancements to match the performance of specialized deep learning models.

Related papers

• PUB: Plot Understanding Benchmark and Dataset for Evaluating Large Language Models on Synthetic Visual Data Interpretation [2.1184929769291294]
  This paper presents a novel synthetic dataset designed to evaluate the proficiency of large language models in interpreting data visualizations. Our dataset is generated using controlled parameters to ensure comprehensive coverage of potential real-world scenarios. We employ multimodal text prompts with questions related to visual data in images to benchmark several state-of-the-art models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T11:19:17Z)
• On Pre-training of Multimodal Language Models Customized for Chart Understanding [83.99377088129282]
  This paper explores the training processes necessary to improve MLLMs' comprehension of charts. We introduce CHOPINLLM, an MLLM tailored for in-depth chart comprehension.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T17:58:36Z)
• Enhancing Large Vision Language Models with Self-Training on Image Comprehension [99.9389737339175]
  We introduce Self-Training on Image (STIC), which emphasizes a self-training approach specifically for image comprehension. First, the model self-constructs a preference for image descriptions using unlabeled images. To further self-improve reasoning on the extracted visual information, we let the model reuse a small portion of existing instruction-tuning data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T05:53:49Z)
• Exploring the Distinctiveness and Fidelity of the Descriptions Generated by Large Vision-Language Models [16.524244395901356]
  We study how models like Open-Flamingo, IDEFICS, and MiniGPT-4 can distinguish between similar objects and accurately describe visual features. We propose the Textual Retrieval-Augmented Classification (TRAC) framework, which allows us to delve deeper into analyzing fine-grained visual description generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-26T16:59:26Z)
• Finer: Investigating and Enhancing Fine-Grained Visual Concept Recognition in Large Vision Language Models [57.95366341738857]
  In-depth analyses show that instruction-tuned LVLMs exhibit modality gap, showing discrepancy when given textual and visual inputs that correspond to the same concept. We propose a multiple attribute-centric evaluation benchmark, Finer, to evaluate LVLMs' fine-grained visual comprehension ability and provide significantly improved explainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T05:43:51Z)
• Benchmarking Zero-Shot Recognition with Vision-Language Models: Challenges on Granularity and Specificity [45.86789047206224]
  This paper presents novel benchmarks for evaluating vision-language models (VLMs) in zero-shot recognition. Our benchmarks test VLMs' consistency in understanding concepts across semantic granularity levels and their response to varying text specificity. Findings show that VLMs favor moderately fine-grained concepts and struggle with specificity, often misjudging texts that differ from their training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-28T09:29:06Z)
• Learning to Decompose Visual Features with Latent Textual Prompts [140.2117637223449]
  We propose Decomposed Feature Prompting (DeFo) to improve vision-language models. Our empirical study shows DeFo's significance in improving the vision-language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-09T15:40:13Z)
• Revisiting Self-Training for Few-Shot Learning of Language Model [61.173976954360334]
  Unlabeled data carry rich task-relevant information, they are proven useful for few-shot learning of language model. In this work, we revisit the self-training technique for language model fine-tuning and present a state-of-the-art prompt-based few-shot learner, SFLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-04T08:51:36Z)
• Investigating Pretrained Language Models for Graph-to-Text Generation [55.55151069694146]
  Graph-to-text generation aims to generate fluent texts from graph-based data. We present a study across three graph domains: meaning representations, Wikipedia knowledge graphs (KGs) and scientific KGs. We show that the PLMs BART and T5 achieve new state-of-the-art results and that task-adaptive pretraining strategies improve their performance even further.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-16T16:05:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.