MM-Vet v2: A Challenging Benchmark to Evaluate Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.00765v2
• Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2024 06:08:00 GMT
• Title: MM-Vet v2: A Challenging Benchmark to Evaluate Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilities
• Authors: Weihao Yu, Zhengyuan Yang, Lingfeng Ren, Linjie Li, Jianfeng Wang, Kevin Lin, Chung-Ching Lin, Zicheng Liu, Lijuan Wang, Xinchao Wang,
• Abstract summary: We introduce MM-Vet v2, which includes a new "image-text sequence understanding" capability called "image-text sequence understanding" Using MM-Vet v2 to benchmark large multimodal models, we found that Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the best model with a score of 71.8, slightly outperforming GPT-4o which scored 71.0.
• Score: 146.4724093405187
• License:
• Abstract: MM-Vet, with open-ended vision-language questions targeting at evaluating integrated capabilities, has become one of the most popular benchmarks for large multimodal model evaluation. MM-Vet assesses six core vision-language (VL) capabilities: recognition, knowledge, spatial awareness, language generation, OCR, and math. However, its question format is restricted to single image-text pairs, lacking the interleaved image and text sequences prevalent in real-world scenarios. To address this limitation, we introduce MM-Vet v2, which includes a new VL capability called "image-text sequence understanding", evaluating models' ability to process VL sequences. Furthermore, we maintain the high quality of evaluation samples while further expanding the evaluation set size. Using MM-Vet v2 to benchmark large multimodal models, we found that Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the best model with a score of 71.8, slightly outperforming GPT-4o which scored 71.0. Among open-weight models, InternVL2-Llama3-76B leads with a score of 68.4. The code, data, and leaderboard are accessible at https://github.com/yuweihao/MM-Vet.

Related papers

• Multimodal RewardBench: Holistic Evaluation of Reward Models for Vision Language Models [82.92771279118888]
  We introduce Multimodal RewardBench, an expert-annotated benchmark for evaluating multimodal reward models. Our dataset comprises 5,211 annotated (prompt, chosen response, rejected response) triplets collected from various vision-language models. We find that even the top-performing models, Gemini 1.5 Pro and Claude 3.5 Sonnet, achieve only 72% overall accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T01:48:13Z)
• Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scaling [128.24325909395188]
  We introduce InternVL 2.5, an advanced multimodal large language model (MLLM) series that builds upon InternVL 2.0. InternVL 2.5 exhibits competitive performance, rivaling leading commercial models such as GPT-4o and Claude-3.5-Sonnet. We hope this model contributes to the open-source community by setting new standards for developing and applying multimodal AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T18:57:08Z)
• DARE: Diverse Visual Question Answering with Robustness Evaluation [16.87867803628065]
  Vision Language Models (VLMs) extend remarkable capabilities of text-only large language models and vision-only models. They struggle with a number of crucial vision-language (VL) reasoning abilities such as counting and spatial reasoning. We introduce DARE, Diverse Visual Question Answering with Robustness Evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T16:31:50Z)
• ViTamin: Designing Scalable Vision Models in the Vision-Language Era [26.878662961209997]
  Vision Transformers (ViTs) remain the default choice for the image encoder. ViTamin-L significantly outperforms ViT-L by 2.0% ImageNet zero-shot accuracy. ViTamin-XL with only 436M parameters attains 82.9% ImageNet zero-shot accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T17:40:29Z)
• Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models? [92.5761176224556]
  Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have recently achieved rapid progress, sparking numerous studies to evaluate their multi-modal capabilities. We identify two primary issues: Visual content is unnecessary for many samples and intentional data leakage exists. We present MMStar, an elite vision-indispensable multi-modal benchmark comprising 1,500 samples meticulously selected by humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-29T17:59:34Z)
• MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilities [153.37868034779385]
  We propose MM-Vet, an evaluation benchmark that examines large multimodal models (LMMs) on complicated multimodal tasks. Recent LMMs have shown various intriguing abilities, such as solving math problems written on the blackboard, reasoning about events and celebrities in news images, and explaining visual jokes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-04T17:59:47Z)
• MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player? [114.45702807380415]
  We propose MMBench, a benchmark for assessing the multi-modal capabilities of vision-language models. MMBench is meticulously curated with well-designed quality control schemes. MMBench incorporates multiple-choice questions in both English and Chinese versions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-12T16:23:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.