Towards Less Greedy Quantum Coalition Structure Generation in Induced Subgraph Games

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.04366v2
• Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2024 17:06:55 GMT
• Title: Towards Less Greedy Quantum Coalition Structure Generation in Induced Subgraph Games
• Authors: Jonas Nüßlein, Daniëlle Schuman, David Bucher, Naeimeh Mohseni, Kumar Ghosh, Corey O'Meara, Giorgio Cortiana, Claudia Linnhoff-Popien,
• Abstract summary: The transition to 100% renewable energy requires new techniques for managing energy networks, such as dividing them into sensible subsets of prosumers called micro-grids. Doing so in an optimal manner is a difficult optimization problem, as it can be abstracted to the Coalition Structure Generation problem in Induced Subgraph Games. This work proposes several less greedy QA-based approaches and investigates whether any of them can outperform GCS-Q in terms of solution quality.
• Score: 3.6021182997326022
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The transition to 100% renewable energy requires new techniques for managing energy networks, such as dividing them into sensible subsets of prosumers called micro-grids. Doing so in an optimal manner is a difficult optimization problem, as it can be abstracted to the Coalition Structure Generation problem in Induced Subgraph Games, a NP-complete problem which requires dividing an undirected, complete, weighted graph into subgraphs in a way that maximizes the sum of their internal weights. Recently, Venkatesh et al. (arXiv:2212.11372) published a Quantum Annealing (QA)-based iterative algorithm called GCS-Q, which they claim to be the best currently existing solver for the problem in terms of runtime complexity. As this algorithm makes the application of QA to the problem seem promising, but is a greedy one, this work proposes several less greedy QA-based approaches and investigates whether any of them can outperform GCS-Q in terms of solution quality. While we find that this is not the case yet on D-Wave hardware, most of them do when using the classical QBSolv software as a solver. Especially an algorithm we call 4-split iterative R-QUBO shows potential here, finding all optima in our dataset while scaling favorably with the problem size in terms of runtime. Thus, it appears to be interesting for future research on quantum approaches to the problem, assuming QA hardware will become more noise-resilient over time.

Related papers

• Imaginary Hamiltonian variational ansatz for combinatorial optimization problems [3.14105061893604]
  We introduce a tree arrangement of the parametrized quantum gates, enabling the exact solution of arbitrary tree graphs using the one-round $i$HVA. Our ansatz solves MaxCut exactly for graphs with up to 24 nodes and $D leq 5$, whereas only approximate solutions can be derived by the classical near-optimal Goemans-Williamson algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-17T03:34:17Z)
• Sum-of-Squares inspired Quantum Metaheuristic for Polynomial Optimization with the Hadamard Test and Approximate Amplitude Constraints [76.53316706600717]
  Recently proposed quantum algorithm arXiv:2206.14999 is based on semidefinite programming (SDP) We generalize the SDP-inspired quantum algorithm to sum-of-squares. Our results show that our algorithm is suitable for large problems and approximate the best known classicals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T19:04:13Z)
• Hybrid Classical-Quantum Simulation of MaxCut using QAOA-in-QAOA [0.0]
  In this work, an implementation of the QAOA2 method for the scalable solution of the MaxCut problem is presented. The limits of the Goemans-Williamson (GW) algorithm as a purely classical alternative to QAOA are investigated. Results from large-scale simulations of up to 33 qubits are presented, showing the advantage of QAOA in certain cases and the efficiency of the implementation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T09:02:31Z)
• Depth scaling of unstructured search via quantum approximate optimization [0.0]
  Variational quantum algorithms have become the de facto model for current quantum computations. One such problem is unstructured search which consists on finding a particular bit of string. We trotterize a CTQW to recover a QAOA sequence, and employ recent advances on the theory of Trotter formulas to bound the query complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-22T18:00:03Z)
• Variational Quantum Algorithms for the Allocation of Resources in a Cloud/Edge Architecture [1.072460284847973]
  We show that Variational Quantum Algorithms can be a viable alternative to classical algorithms in the near future. In particular, we compare the performances, in terms of success probability, of two algorithms, i.e., Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) and Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) The simulation experiments, performed for a set of simple problems, %CM230124 that involve a Cloud and two Edge nodes, show that the VQE algorithm ensures better performances when it is equipped with appropriate circuit textitansatzes that are able to restrict the search space
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-25T17:37:40Z)
• Modified Iterative Quantum Amplitude Estimation is Asymptotically Optimal [0.37798600249187286]
  We provide the first QFT-free algorithm for Quantum Amplitude Estimation (QAE) QAE algorithms appear as a subroutine in many applications for quantum computers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-31T03:20:10Z)
• QAOA-in-QAOA: solving large-scale MaxCut problems on small quantum machines [81.4597482536073]
  Quantum approximate optimization algorithms (QAOAs) utilize the power of quantum machines and inherit the spirit of adiabatic evolution. We propose QAOA-in-QAOA ($textQAOA2$) to solve arbitrary large-scale MaxCut problems using quantum machines. Our method can be seamlessly embedded into other advanced strategies to enhance the capability of QAOAs in large-scale optimization problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-24T03:49:10Z)
• Adiabatic Quantum Computing for Multi Object Tracking [170.8716555363907]
  Multi-Object Tracking (MOT) is most often approached in the tracking-by-detection paradigm, where object detections are associated through time. As these optimization problems are often NP-hard, they can only be solved exactly for small instances on current hardware. We show that our approach is competitive compared with state-of-the-art optimization-based approaches, even when using of-the-shelf integer programming solvers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-17T18:59:20Z)
• Scaling Quantum Approximate Optimization on Near-term Hardware [49.94954584453379]
  We quantify scaling of the expected resource requirements by optimized circuits for hardware architectures with varying levels of connectivity. We show the number of measurements, and hence total time to synthesizing solution, grows exponentially in problem size and problem graph degree. These problems may be alleviated by increasing hardware connectivity or by recently proposed modifications to the QAOA that achieve higher performance with fewer circuit layers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-06T21:02:30Z)
• On Applying the Lackadaisical Quantum Walk Algorithm to Search for Multiple Solutions on Grids [63.75363908696257]
  The lackadaisical quantum walk is an algorithm developed to search graph structures whose vertices have a self-loop of weight $l$. This paper addresses several issues related to applying the lackadaisical quantum walk to search for multiple solutions on grids successfully.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-11T09:43:09Z)
• Q-Match: Iterative Shape Matching via Quantum Annealing [64.74942589569596]
  Finding shape correspondences can be formulated as an NP-hard quadratic assignment problem (QAP) This paper proposes Q-Match, a new iterative quantum method for QAPs inspired by the alpha-expansion algorithm. Q-Match can be applied for shape matching problems iteratively, on a subset of well-chosen correspondences, allowing us to scale to real-world problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-06T17:59:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.