Understanding the Performance and Estimating the Cost of LLM Fine-Tuning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.04693v1
- Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 16:26:07 GMT
- Title: Understanding the Performance and Estimating the Cost of LLM Fine-Tuning
- Authors: Yuchen Xia, Jiho Kim, Yuhan Chen, Haojie Ye, Souvik Kundu, Cong, Hao, Nishil Talati,
- Abstract summary: Fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) for specific tasks in a cost-effective manner.
In this paper, we characterize sparse Mixture of Experts (MoE) based LLM fine-tuning to understand their accuracy and runtime performance.
We also develop and validate an analytical model to estimate the cost of LLM fine-tuning on the cloud.
- Score: 9.751868268608675
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Due to the cost-prohibitive nature of training Large Language Models (LLMs), fine-tuning has emerged as an attractive alternative for specializing LLMs for specific tasks using limited compute resources in a cost-effective manner. In this paper, we characterize sparse Mixture of Experts (MoE) based LLM fine-tuning to understand their accuracy and runtime performance on a single GPU. Our evaluation provides unique insights into the training efficacy of sparse and dense versions of MoE models, as well as their runtime characteristics, including maximum batch size, execution time breakdown, end-to-end throughput, GPU hardware utilization, and load distribution. Our study identifies the optimization of the MoE layer as crucial for further improving the performance of LLM fine-tuning. Using our profiling results, we also develop and validate an analytical model to estimate the cost of LLM fine-tuning on the cloud. This model, based on parameters of the model and GPU architecture, estimates LLM throughput and the cost of training, aiding practitioners in industry and academia to budget the cost of fine-tuning a specific model.
Related papers
- From Large to Super-Tiny: End-to-End Optimization for Cost-Efficient LLMs [23.253571170594455]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly advanced artificial intelligence.
This paper introduces a three-stage cost-efficient end-to-end LLM deployment pipeline.
Our approach yields a super tiny model optimized for cost and performance in online systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-18T05:25:22Z) - Efficient Model Selection for Time Series Forecasting via LLMs [52.31535714387368]
We propose to leverage Large Language Models (LLMs) as a lightweight alternative for model selection.
Our method eliminates the need for explicit performance matrices by utilizing the inherent knowledge and reasoning capabilities of LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-02T20:33:27Z) - Cost-Optimal Grouped-Query Attention for Long-Context LLMs [64.90662568387683]
Building effective Transformer-based large language models (LLMs) has recently become a research focus.
We compare models with different parameter sizes, context lengths, and attention head configurations in terms of model performance, computational cost, and memory cost.
Our studies show that, when processing sufficiently long sequences, a larger model with fewer attention heads can achieve a lower loss while incurring lower computational and memory costs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-12T17:50:42Z) - DSMoE: Matrix-Partitioned Experts with Dynamic Routing for Computation-Efficient Dense LLMs [70.91804882618243]
This paper proposes DSMoE, a novel approach that achieves sparsification by partitioning pre-trained FFN layers into computational blocks.
We implement adaptive expert routing using sigmoid activation and straight-through estimators, enabling tokens to flexibly access different aspects of model knowledge.
Experiments on LLaMA models demonstrate that under equivalent computational constraints, DSMoE achieves superior performance compared to existing pruning and MoE approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-18T02:37:26Z) - Reward-Guided Speculative Decoding for Efficient LLM Reasoning [80.55186052123196]
We introduce Reward-Guided Speculative Decoding (RSD), a novel framework aimed at improving the efficiency of inference in large language models (LLMs)
RSD incorporates a controlled bias to prioritize high-reward outputs, in contrast to existing speculative decoding methods that enforce strict unbiasedness.
RSD delivers significant efficiency gains against decoding with the target model only, while achieving significant better accuracy than parallel decoding method on average.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-31T17:19:57Z) - A Little Help Goes a Long Way: Efficient LLM Training by Leveraging Small LMs [74.35290684163718]
A primary challenge in large language model (LLM) development is their onerous pre-training cost.
This paper explores a promising paradigm to improve LLM pre-training efficiency and quality by leveraging a small language model (SLM)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-24T14:31:52Z) - Scaling Laws for Predicting Downstream Performance in LLMs [75.28559015477137]
This work focuses on the pre-training loss as a more-efficient metric for performance estimation.
We extend the power law analytical function to predict domain-specific pre-training loss based on FLOPs across data sources.
We employ a two-layer neural network to model the non-linear relationship between multiple domain-specific loss and downstream performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-11T04:57:48Z) - Attribute Controlled Fine-tuning for Large Language Models: A Case Study on Detoxification [76.14641982122696]
We propose a constraint learning schema for fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) with attribute control.
We show that our approach leads to an LLM that produces fewer inappropriate responses while achieving competitive performance on benchmarks and a toxicity detection task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-07T23:38:58Z) - Achieving Peak Performance for Large Language Models: A Systematic Review [0.0]
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in natural language processing (NLP)
As models grow into the trillion- parameter range, computational and memory costs increase significantly.
This makes it difficult for many researchers to access the resources needed to train or apply these models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-07T13:57:41Z) - Performance Law of Large Language Models [58.32539851241063]
Performance law can be used to guide the choice of LLM architecture and the effective allocation of computational resources.
Performance law can be used to guide the choice of LLM architecture and the effective allocation of computational resources without extensive experiments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-19T11:09:12Z) - CoMMIT: Coordinated Instruction Tuning for Multimodal Large Language Models [68.64605538559312]
In this paper, we analyze the MLLM instruction tuning from both theoretical and empirical perspectives.
Inspired by our findings, we propose a measurement to quantitatively evaluate the learning balance.
In addition, we introduce an auxiliary loss regularization method to promote updating of the generation distribution of MLLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-29T23:18:55Z) - SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts.
We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM.
We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z) - Investigating Automatic Scoring and Feedback using Large Language Models [46.1232919707345]
This paper explores the efficacy of PEFT-based quantized models, employing classification or regression head, to fine-tune language models for automatic grading and feedback generation.
The results show that prediction of grade scores via finetuned LLMs are highly accurate, achieving less than 3% error in grade percentage on average.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-01T16:13:54Z) - Assessing Economic Viability: A Comparative Analysis of Total Cost of Ownership for Domain-Adapted Large Language Models versus State-of-the-art Counterparts in Chip Design Coding Assistance [10.364901568556435]
This paper presents a comparative analysis of total cost of ownership (TCO) and performance between domain-adapted large language models (LLM) and state-of-the-art (SoTA) LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-12T23:37:56Z) - Leveraging Zero-Shot Prompting for Efficient Language Model Distillation [3.4205390087622582]
This paper introduces a novel approach for efficiently distilling LLMs into smaller, application-specific models.
It utilizes LLMs' reasoning capabilities to generate labels and natural language rationales for unlabeled data.
Key contributions include the employment of zero-shot prompting to elicit teacher model rationales.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-23T16:51:52Z) - SMART: Automatically Scaling Down Language Models with Accuracy Guarantees for Reduced Processing Fees [21.801053526411415]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly boosted performance in natural language processing (NLP) tasks.
The deployment of high-performance LLMs incurs substantial costs, primarily due to the increased number of parameters aimed at enhancing model performance.
We introduce SMART, a novel framework designed to minimize the inference costs of NLP tasks while ensuring sufficient result quality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-11T17:45:47Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.