Leveraging Zero-Shot Prompting for Efficient Language Model Distillation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.15886v1
- Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 16:51:52 GMT
- Title: Leveraging Zero-Shot Prompting for Efficient Language Model Distillation
- Authors: Lukas Vöge, Vincent Gurgul, Stefan Lessmann,
- Abstract summary: This paper introduces a novel approach for efficiently distilling LLMs into smaller, application-specific models.
It utilizes LLMs' reasoning capabilities to generate labels and natural language rationales for unlabeled data.
Key contributions include the employment of zero-shot prompting to elicit teacher model rationales.
- Score: 3.4205390087622582
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: This paper introduces a novel approach for efficiently distilling LLMs into smaller, application-specific models, significantly reducing operational costs and manual labor. Addressing the challenge of deploying computationally intensive LLMs in specific applications or edge devices, this technique utilizes LLMs' reasoning capabilities to generate labels and natural language rationales for unlabeled data. Our approach enhances both finetuning and distillation by employing a multi-task training framework where student models mimic these rationales alongside teacher predictions. Key contributions include the employment of zero-shot prompting to elicit teacher model rationales, reducing the necessity for handcrafted few-shot examples and lowering the overall token count required, which directly translates to cost savings given the pay-per-token billing model of major tech companies' LLM APIs. Additionally, the paper investigates the impact of explanation properties on distillation efficiency, demonstrating that minimal performance loss occurs even when rationale augmentation is not applied across the entire dataset, facilitating further reductions of tokens. This research marks a step toward the efficient training of task-specific models with minimal human intervention, offering substantial cost-savings while maintaining, or even enhancing, performance.
Related papers
- Rational Metareasoning for Large Language Models [5.5539136805232205]
Being prompted to engage in reasoning has emerged as a core technique for using large language models (LLMs)
This work introduces a novel approach based on computational models of metareasoning used in cognitive science.
We develop a reward function that incorporates the Value of Computation by penalizing unnecessary reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-07T23:48:52Z) - Understanding the Performance and Estimating the Cost of LLM Fine-Tuning [9.751868268608675]
Fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) for specific tasks in a cost-effective manner.
In this paper, we characterize sparse Mixture of Experts (MoE) based LLM fine-tuning to understand their accuracy and runtime performance.
We also develop and validate an analytical model to estimate the cost of LLM fine-tuning on the cloud.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-08T16:26:07Z) - SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts.
We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM.
We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z) - Enabling Natural Zero-Shot Prompting on Encoder Models via Statement-Tuning [55.265138447400744]
Statement-Tuning is a technique that models discriminative tasks as a set of finite statements and trains an encoder model to discriminate between the potential statements to determine the label.
Experimental results demonstrate that Statement-Tuning achieves competitive performance compared to state-of-the-art LLMs with significantly fewer parameters.
The study investigates the impact of several design choices on few-shot and zero-shot generalization, revealing that Statement-Tuning can achieve strong performance with modest training data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-19T14:05:03Z) - SMART: Automatically Scaling Down Language Models with Accuracy Guarantees for Reduced Processing Fees [21.801053526411415]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly boosted performance in natural language processing (NLP) tasks.
The deployment of high-performance LLMs incurs substantial costs, primarily due to the increased number of parameters aimed at enhancing model performance.
We introduce SMART, a novel framework designed to minimize the inference costs of NLP tasks while ensuring sufficient result quality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-11T17:45:47Z) - ELAD: Explanation-Guided Large Language Models Active Distillation [16.243249111524403]
The deployment and application of Large Language Models (LLMs) is hindered by their memory inefficiency, computational demands, and the high costs of API inferences.
Traditional distillation methods, which transfer the capabilities of LLMs to smaller models, often fail to determine whether the knowledge has been sufficiently transferred.
We propose an Explanation-Guided LLMs Active Distillation (ELAD) framework that employs an active learning strategy to optimize the balance between annotation costs and model performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-20T15:47:59Z) - An Experimental Design Framework for Label-Efficient Supervised Finetuning of Large Language Models [55.01592097059969]
Supervised finetuning on instruction datasets has played a crucial role in achieving the remarkable zero-shot generalization capabilities.
Active learning is effective in identifying useful subsets of samples to annotate from an unlabeled pool.
We propose using experimental design to circumvent the computational bottlenecks of active learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-12T16:56:54Z) - Boosting Inference Efficiency: Unleashing the Power of Parameter-Shared
Pre-trained Language Models [109.06052781040916]
We introduce a technique to enhance the inference efficiency of parameter-shared language models.
We also propose a simple pre-training technique that leads to fully or partially shared models.
Results demonstrate the effectiveness of our methods on both autoregressive and autoencoding PLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-19T15:13:58Z) - Scaled Prompt-Tuning for Few-Shot Natural Language Generation [9.399840807973545]
Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate stronger language understanding and generation capabilities.
Memory demand and computation cost of fine-tuning LLMs on downstream tasks are non-negligible.
We propose a Scaled Prompt-Tuning (SPT) method which surpasses conventional PT with better performance and generalization ability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-13T07:12:31Z) - Language models are weak learners [71.33837923104808]
We show that prompt-based large language models can operate effectively as weak learners.
We incorporate these models into a boosting approach, which can leverage the knowledge within the model to outperform traditional tree-based boosting.
Results illustrate the potential for prompt-based LLMs to function not just as few-shot learners themselves, but as components of larger machine learning pipelines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-25T02:39:19Z) - OverPrompt: Enhancing ChatGPT through Efficient In-Context Learning [49.38867353135258]
We propose OverPrompt, leveraging the in-context learning capability of LLMs to handle multiple task inputs.
Our experiments show that OverPrompt can achieve cost-efficient zero-shot classification without causing significant detriment to task performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T10:08:04Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.