Performance Law of Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.09895v4
- Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 12:28:45 GMT
- Title: Performance Law of Large Language Models
- Authors: Chuhan Wu, Ruiming Tang,
- Abstract summary: Performance law can be used to guide the choice of LLM architecture and the effective allocation of computational resources.
Performance law can be used to guide the choice of LLM architecture and the effective allocation of computational resources without extensive experiments.
- Score: 58.32539851241063
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Guided by the belief of the scaling law, large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive performance in recent years. However, scaling law only gives a qualitative estimation of loss, which is influenced by various factors such as model architectures, data distributions, tokenizers, and computation precision. Thus, estimating the real performance of LLMs with different training settings rather than loss may be quite useful in practical development. In this article, we present an empirical equation named "Performance Law" to directly predict the MMLU score of an LLM, which is a widely used metric to indicate the general capability of LLMs in real-world conversations and applications. Based on only a few key hyperparameters of the LLM architecture and the size of training data, we obtain a quite accurate MMLU prediction of various LLMs with diverse sizes and architectures developed by different organizations in different years. Performance law can be used to guide the choice of LLM architecture and the effective allocation of computational resources without extensive experiments.
Related papers
- LLaVA-KD: A Framework of Distilling Multimodal Large Language Models [70.19607283302712]
We propose a novel framework to transfer knowledge from l-MLLM to s-MLLM.
Specifically, we introduce Multimodal Distillation (MDist) to minimize the divergence between the visual-textual output distributions of l-MLLM and s-MLLM.
We also propose a three-stage training scheme to fully exploit the potential of s-MLLM.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-21T17:41:28Z) - Achieving Peak Performance for Large Language Models: A Systematic Review [0.0]
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in natural language processing (NLP)
As models grow into the trillion- parameter range, computational and memory costs increase significantly.
This makes it difficult for many researchers to access the resources needed to train or apply these models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-07T13:57:41Z) - CoMMIT: Coordinated Instruction Tuning for Multimodal Large Language Models [68.64605538559312]
In this paper, we analyze the MLLM instruction tuning from both theoretical and empirical perspectives.
Inspired by our findings, we propose a measurement to quantitatively evaluate the learning balance.
In addition, we introduce an auxiliary loss regularization method to promote updating of the generation distribution of MLLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-29T23:18:55Z) - Empirical Guidelines for Deploying LLMs onto Resource-constrained Edge Devices [32.61693246340064]
We study how a resource-constrained computing environment would affect the design choices for a personalized LLM.
We consider the tradeoffs among a number of key design factors and their intertwined impacts on learning efficiency and accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-06T06:41:53Z) - Automated Commit Message Generation with Large Language Models: An Empirical Study and Beyond [24.151927600694066]
Commit Message Generation (CMG) approaches aim to automatically generate commit messages based on given code diffs.
This paper conducts the first comprehensive experiment to investigate how far we have been in applying Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate high-quality commit messages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-23T08:24:43Z) - Characterizing Truthfulness in Large Language Model Generations with
Local Intrinsic Dimension [63.330262740414646]
We study how to characterize and predict the truthfulness of texts generated from large language models (LLMs)
We suggest investigating internal activations and quantifying LLM's truthfulness using the local intrinsic dimension (LID) of model activations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-28T04:56:21Z) - A Comprehensive Evaluation of Quantization Strategies for Large Language Models [42.03804933928227]
Increasing the number of parameters in large language models (LLMs) usually improves performance in downstream tasks but raises compute and memory costs.
Quantization techniques, which reduce the bits needed for model weights or activations with minimal performance loss, have become popular.
We propose a structured evaluation framework consisting of three critical dimensions: knowledge & capacity, (2) alignment, and (3) efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-26T17:45:36Z) - Knowledge Fusion of Large Language Models [73.28202188100646]
This paper introduces the notion of knowledge fusion for large language models (LLMs)
We externalize their collective knowledge and unique strengths, thereby elevating the capabilities of the target model beyond those of any individual source LLM.
Our findings confirm that the fusion of LLMs can improve the performance of the target model across a range of capabilities such as reasoning, commonsense, and code generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-19T05:02:46Z) - Response Length Perception and Sequence Scheduling: An LLM-Empowered LLM
Inference Pipeline [22.08897444328099]
Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the field of AI, demonstrating unprecedented capacity across various tasks.
In this paper, we propose an efficient LLM inference pipeline that harnesses the power of LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-22T15:36:06Z) - LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language Models [65.02607075556742]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in language understanding and generation.
We tackle the compression of LLMs within the bound of two constraints: being task-agnostic and minimizing the reliance on the original training dataset.
Our method, named LLM-Pruner, adopts structural pruning that selectively removes non-critical coupled structures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-19T12:10:53Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.