The doctor will polygraph you now: ethical concerns with AI for fact-checking patients

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.07896v2
• Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 20:31:32 GMT
• Title: The doctor will polygraph you now: ethical concerns with AI for fact-checking patients
• Authors: James Anibal, Jasmine Gunkel, Shaheen Awan, Hannah Huth, Hang Nguyen, Tram Le, Jean-Christophe Bélisle-Pipon, Micah Boyer, Lindsey Hazen, Bridge2AI Voice Consortium, Yael Bensoussan, David Clifton, Bradford Wood,
• Abstract summary: Artificial intelligence (AI) methods have been proposed for the prediction of social behaviors. This raises novel ethical concerns about respect, privacy, and control over patient data.
• Score: 0.23248585800296404
• License:
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) methods have been proposed for the prediction of social behaviors which could be reasonably understood from patient-reported information. This raises novel ethical concerns about respect, privacy, and control over patient data. Ethical concerns surrounding clinical AI systems for social behavior verification can be divided into two main categories: (1) the potential for inaccuracies/biases within such systems, and (2) the impact on trust in patient-provider relationships with the introduction of automated AI systems for fact-checking, particularly in cases where the data/models may contradict the patient. Additionally, this report simulated the misuse of a verification system using patient voice samples and identified a potential LLM bias against patient-reported information in favor of multi-dimensional data and the outputs of other AI methods (i.e., AI self-trust). Finally, recommendations were presented for mitigating the risk that AI verification methods will cause harm to patients or undermine the purpose of the healthcare system.

Related papers

• Which Client is Reliable?: A Reliable and Personalized Prompt-based Federated Learning for Medical Image Question Answering [51.26412822853409]
  We present a novel personalized federated learning (pFL) method for medical visual question answering (VQA) models. Our method introduces learnable prompts into a Transformer architecture to efficiently train it on diverse medical datasets without massive computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T00:31:17Z)
• Emotional Intelligence Through Artificial Intelligence : NLP and Deep Learning in the Analysis of Healthcare Texts [1.9374282535132377]
  This manuscript presents a methodical examination of the utilization of Artificial Intelligence in the assessment of emotions in texts related to healthcare. We scrutinize numerous research studies that employ AI to augment sentiment analysis, categorize emotions, and forecast patient outcomes. There persist challenges, which encompass ensuring the ethical application of AI, safeguarding patient confidentiality, and addressing potential biases in algorithmic procedures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T15:58:13Z)
• Informing clinical assessment by contextualizing post-hoc explanations of risk prediction models in type-2 diabetes [50.8044927215346]
  We consider a comorbidity risk prediction scenario and focus on contexts regarding the patients clinical state. We employ several state-of-the-art LLMs to present contexts around risk prediction model inferences and evaluate their acceptability. Our paper is one of the first end-to-end analyses identifying the feasibility and benefits of contextual explanations in a real-world clinical use case.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-11T18:07:11Z)
• The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and Strategies [97.5153823429076]
  The benefits, challenges and drawbacks of AI in this field are reviewed. The use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods are also discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-08T23:23:39Z)
• Why patient data cannot be easily forgotten? [18.089204090335667]
  We study the influence of patient data on model performance and formulate two hypotheses for a patient's data. We propose a targeted forgetting approach to perform patient-wise forgetting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-29T11:36:49Z)
• Leveraging Clinical Context for User-Centered Explainability: A Diabetes Use Case [4.520155732176645]
  We implement a proof-of-concept (POC) in type-2 diabetes (T2DM) use case where we assess the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) Within the POC, we include risk prediction models for CKD, post-hoc explainers of the predictions, and other natural-language modules. Our POC approach covers multiple knowledge sources and clinical scenarios, blends knowledge to explain data and predictions to PCPs, and received an enthusiastic response from our medical expert.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-06T02:44:40Z)
• Semi-Supervised Variational Reasoning for Medical Dialogue Generation [70.838542865384]
  Two key characteristics are relevant for medical dialogue generation: patient states and physician actions. We propose an end-to-end variational reasoning approach to medical dialogue generation. A physician policy network composed of an action-classifier and two reasoning detectors is proposed for augmented reasoning ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-13T04:14:35Z)
• Clinical Outcome Prediction from Admission Notes using Self-Supervised Knowledge Integration [55.88616573143478]
  Outcome prediction from clinical text can prevent doctors from overlooking possible risks. Diagnoses at discharge, procedures performed, in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay prediction are four common outcome prediction targets. We propose clinical outcome pre-training to integrate knowledge about patient outcomes from multiple public sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-08T10:26:44Z)
• Explainable AI meets Healthcare: A Study on Heart Disease Dataset [0.0]
  The aim is to enlighten practitioners on the understandability and interpretability of explainable AI systems using a variety of techniques. Our paper contains examples based on the heart disease dataset and elucidates on how the explainability techniques should be preferred to create trustworthiness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-06T05:18:43Z)
• BiteNet: Bidirectional Temporal Encoder Network to Predict Medical Outcomes [53.163089893876645]
  We propose a novel self-attention mechanism that captures the contextual dependency and temporal relationships within a patient's healthcare journey. An end-to-end bidirectional temporal encoder network (BiteNet) then learns representations of the patient's journeys. We have evaluated the effectiveness of our methods on two supervised prediction and two unsupervised clustering tasks with a real-world EHR dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-24T00:42:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.