Uncertainty Quantification of Surrogate Models using Conformal Prediction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.09881v2
• Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 11:14:58 GMT
• Title: Uncertainty Quantification of Surrogate Models using Conformal Prediction
• Authors: Vignesh Gopakumar, Ander Gray, Joel Oskarsson, Lorenzo Zanisi, Stanislas Pamela, Daniel Giles, Matt Kusner, Marc Peter Deisenroth,
• Abstract summary: We formalise a conformal prediction framework that satisfies predictions in a model-agnostic manner, requiring near-zero computational costs. The paper looks at providing statistically valid error bars for deterministic models, as well as crafting guarantees to the error bars of probabilistic models.
• Score: 7.445864392018774
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Data-driven surrogate models have shown immense potential as quick, inexpensive approximations to complex numerical and experimental modelling tasks. However, most surrogate models of physical systems do not quantify their uncertainty, rendering their predictions unreliable, requiring further validation. Though Bayesian approximations offer some solace in estimating the error associated with these models, they cannot provide guarantees, and the quality of their inferences depends on the availability of prior information and good approximations to posteriors for complex problems. This is particularly pertinent to multi-variable or spatio-temporal problems. Our work constructs and formalises a conformal prediction framework that satisfies marginal coverage for spatio-temporal predictions in a model-agnostic manner, requiring near-zero computational costs. We provide an extensive empirical study of the application of the framework to ascertain valid error bars that provide guaranteed coverage across the surrogate model's domain of operation. The application scope of our work extends across a large range of spatio-temporal models, from solving partial differential equations to weather forecasting. Through the applications, the paper looks at providing statistically valid error bars for deterministic models, as well as crafting guarantees to the error bars of probabilistic models. Our conformal prediction formalisation provides guaranteed coverage of the surrogate model, regardless of model architecture, and its training regime and is unbothered by the curse of dimensionality.

Related papers

• Valid Error Bars for Neural Weather Models using Conformal Prediction [0.1806830971023738]
  We construct and formalise a conformal prediction framework as a post-processing method for estimating uncertainty. No modifications are required to the model and the computational cost is negligible compared to model training. We demonstrate the usefulness of the conformal prediction framework on a limited area neural weather model for the Nordic region.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T16:45:41Z)
• Predictive Churn with the Set of Good Models [64.05949860750235]
  We study the effect of conflicting predictions over the set of near-optimal machine learning models. We present theoretical results on the expected churn between models within the Rashomon set. We show how our approach can be used to better anticipate, reduce, and avoid churn in consumer-facing applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T16:15:25Z)
• Parameter uncertainties for imperfect surrogate models in the low-noise regime [0.3069335774032178]
  We analyze the generalization error of misspecified, near-deterministic surrogate models. We show posterior distributions must cover every training point to avoid a divergent generalization error. This is demonstrated on model problems before application to thousand dimensional datasets in atomistic machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T11:41:21Z)
• Uncertainty-aware multi-fidelity surrogate modeling with noisy data [0.0]
  In real-world applications, uncertainty is present in both high- and low-fidelity models due to measurement or numerical noise. This paper introduces a comprehensive framework for multi-fidelity surrogate modeling that handles noise-contaminated data. The proposed framework offers a natural approach to combining physical experiments and computational models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T08:37:41Z)
• Quantification of Predictive Uncertainty via Inference-Time Sampling [57.749601811982096]
  We propose a post-hoc sampling strategy for estimating predictive uncertainty accounting for data ambiguity. The method can generate different plausible outputs for a given input and does not assume parametric forms of predictive distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T12:43:21Z)
• ALUM: Adversarial Data Uncertainty Modeling from Latent Model Uncertainty Compensation [25.67258563807856]
  We propose a novel method called ALUM to handle the model uncertainty and data uncertainty in a unified scheme. Our proposed ALUM is model-agnostic which can be easily implemented into any existing deep model with little extra overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-29T17:24:12Z)
• Rigorous Assessment of Model Inference Accuracy using Language Cardinality [5.584832154027001]
  We develop a systematic approach that minimizes bias and uncertainty in model accuracy assessment by replacing statistical estimation with deterministic accuracy measures. We experimentally demonstrate the consistency and applicability of our approach by assessing the accuracy of models inferred by state-of-the-art inference tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-29T21:03:26Z)
• Dense Uncertainty Estimation via an Ensemble-based Conditional Latent Variable Model [68.34559610536614]
  We argue that the aleatoric uncertainty is an inherent attribute of the data and can only be correctly estimated with an unbiased oracle model. We propose a new sampling and selection strategy at train time to approximate the oracle model for aleatoric uncertainty estimation. Our results show that our solution achieves both accurate deterministic results and reliable uncertainty estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-22T08:54:10Z)
• Characterizing Fairness Over the Set of Good Models Under Selective Labels [69.64662540443162]
  We develop a framework for characterizing predictive fairness properties over the set of models that deliver similar overall performance. We provide tractable algorithms to compute the range of attainable group-level predictive disparities. We extend our framework to address the empirically relevant challenge of selectively labelled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-02T02:11:37Z)
• Trust but Verify: Assigning Prediction Credibility by Counterfactual Constrained Learning [123.3472310767721]
  Prediction credibility measures are fundamental in statistics and machine learning. These measures should account for the wide variety of models used in practice. The framework developed in this work expresses the credibility as a risk-fit trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-24T19:52:38Z)
• Efficient Ensemble Model Generation for Uncertainty Estimation with Bayesian Approximation in Segmentation [74.06904875527556]
  We propose a generic and efficient segmentation framework to construct ensemble segmentation models. In the proposed method, ensemble models can be efficiently generated by using the layer selection method. We also devise a new pixel-wise uncertainty loss, which improves the predictive performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-21T16:08:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.