CIPHER: Cybersecurity Intelligent Penetration-testing Helper for Ethical Researcher
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.11650v2
- Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 06:25:49 GMT
- Title: CIPHER: Cybersecurity Intelligent Penetration-testing Helper for Ethical Researcher
- Authors: Derry Pratama, Naufal Suryanto, Andro Aprila Adiputra, Thi-Thu-Huong Le, Ahmada Yusril Kadiptya, Muhammad Iqbal, Howon Kim,
- Abstract summary: We develop CIPHER (Cybersecurity Intelligent Penetration-testing Helper for Ethical Researchers), a large language model specifically trained to assist in penetration testing tasks.
We trained CIPHER using over 300 high-quality write-ups of vulnerable machines, hacking techniques, and documentation of open-source penetration testing tools.
We introduce the Findings, Action, Reasoning, and Results (FARR) Flow augmentation, a novel method to augment penetration testing write-ups to establish a fully automated pentesting simulation benchmark.
- Score: 1.6652242654250329
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Penetration testing, a critical component of cybersecurity, typically requires extensive time and effort to find vulnerabilities. Beginners in this field often benefit from collaborative approaches with the community or experts. To address this, we develop CIPHER (Cybersecurity Intelligent Penetration-testing Helper for Ethical Researchers), a large language model specifically trained to assist in penetration testing tasks. We trained CIPHER using over 300 high-quality write-ups of vulnerable machines, hacking techniques, and documentation of open-source penetration testing tools. Additionally, we introduced the Findings, Action, Reasoning, and Results (FARR) Flow augmentation, a novel method to augment penetration testing write-ups to establish a fully automated pentesting simulation benchmark tailored for large language models. This approach fills a significant gap in traditional cybersecurity Q\&A benchmarks and provides a realistic and rigorous standard for evaluating AI's technical knowledge, reasoning capabilities, and practical utility in dynamic penetration testing scenarios. In our assessments, CIPHER achieved the best overall performance in providing accurate suggestion responses compared to other open-source penetration testing models of similar size and even larger state-of-the-art models like Llama 3 70B and Qwen1.5 72B Chat, particularly on insane difficulty machine setups. This demonstrates that the current capabilities of general LLMs are insufficient for effectively guiding users through the penetration testing process. We also discuss the potential for improvement through scaling and the development of better benchmarks using FARR Flow augmentation results. Our benchmark will be released publicly at https://github.com/ibndias/CIPHER.
Related papers
- Computational Safety for Generative AI: A Signal Processing Perspective [65.268245109828]
computational safety is a mathematical framework that enables the quantitative assessment, formulation, and study of safety challenges in GenAI.
We show how sensitivity analysis and loss landscape analysis can be used to detect malicious prompts with jailbreak attempts.
We discuss key open research challenges, opportunities, and the essential role of signal processing in computational AI safety.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-18T02:26:50Z) - VulnBot: Autonomous Penetration Testing for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework [4.802551205178858]
Existing large language model (LLM)-assisted or automated penetration testing approaches often suffer from inefficiencies.
VulnBot decomposes complex tasks into three specialized phases: reconnaissance, scanning, and exploitation.
Key design features include role specialization, penetration path planning, inter-agent communication, and generative penetration behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-23T06:33:05Z) - PentestAgent: Incorporating LLM Agents to Automated Penetration Testing [6.815381197173165]
Manual penetration testing is time-consuming and expensive.
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) offer new opportunities for enhancing penetration testing.
We propose PentestAgent, a novel LLM-based automated penetration testing framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-07T21:10:39Z) - AutoPT: How Far Are We from the End2End Automated Web Penetration Testing? [54.65079443902714]
We introduce AutoPT, an automated penetration testing agent based on the principle of PSM driven by LLMs.
Our results show that AutoPT outperforms the baseline framework ReAct on the GPT-4o mini model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-02T13:24:30Z) - Towards Automated Penetration Testing: Introducing LLM Benchmark, Analysis, and Improvements [1.4433703131122861]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown potential across various domains, including cybersecurity.
There is currently no comprehensive, open, end-to-end automated penetration testing benchmark.
This paper introduces a novel open benchmark for LLM-based automated penetration testing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-22T16:18:41Z) - SecCodePLT: A Unified Platform for Evaluating the Security of Code GenAI [47.11178028457252]
We develop SecCodePLT, a unified and comprehensive evaluation platform for code GenAIs' risks.
For insecure code, we introduce a new methodology for data creation that combines experts with automatic generation.
For cyberattack helpfulness, we construct samples to prompt a model to generate actual attacks, along with dynamic metrics in our environment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-14T21:17:22Z) - Hacking, The Lazy Way: LLM Augmented Pentesting [0.0]
"LLM Augmented Pentesting" is demonstrated through a tool named "Pentest Copilot"
Our research includes a "chain of thought" mechanism to streamline token usage and boost performance.
We propose a novel file analysis approach, enabling LLMs to understand files.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-14T17:40:35Z) - Integration of cognitive tasks into artificial general intelligence test
for large models [54.72053150920186]
We advocate for a comprehensive framework of cognitive science-inspired artificial general intelligence (AGI) tests.
The cognitive science-inspired AGI tests encompass the full spectrum of intelligence facets, including crystallized intelligence, fluid intelligence, social intelligence, and embodied intelligence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-04T15:50:42Z) - Getting pwn'd by AI: Penetration Testing with Large Language Models [0.0]
This paper explores the potential usage of large-language models, such as GPT3.5, to augment penetration testers with AI sparring partners.
We explore the feasibility of supplementing penetration testers with AI models for two distinct use cases: high-level task planning for security testing assignments and low-level vulnerability hunting within a vulnerable virtual machine.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-24T19:59:22Z) - From Static Benchmarks to Adaptive Testing: Psychometrics in AI Evaluation [60.14902811624433]
We discuss a paradigm shift from static evaluation methods to adaptive testing.
This involves estimating the characteristics and value of each test item in the benchmark and dynamically adjusting items in real-time.
We analyze the current approaches, advantages, and underlying reasons for adopting psychometrics in AI evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-18T09:54:33Z) - Increasing the Confidence of Deep Neural Networks by Coverage Analysis [71.57324258813674]
This paper presents a lightweight monitoring architecture based on coverage paradigms to enhance the model against different unsafe inputs.
Experimental results show that the proposed approach is effective in detecting both powerful adversarial examples and out-of-distribution inputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-28T16:38:26Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.