LLbezpeky: Leveraging Large Language Models for Vulnerability Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.01269v2
• Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 17:56:24 GMT
• Title: LLbezpeky: Leveraging Large Language Models for Vulnerability Detection
• Authors: Noble Saji Mathews, Yelizaveta Brus, Yousra Aafer, Meiyappan Nagappan, Shane McIntosh
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown tremendous potential in understanding semnatics in human as well as programming languages. We focus on building an AI-driven workflow to assist developers in identifying and rectifying vulnerabilities.
• Score: 10.330063887545398
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Despite the continued research and progress in building secure systems, Android applications continue to be ridden with vulnerabilities, necessitating effective detection methods. Current strategies involving static and dynamic analysis tools come with limitations like overwhelming number of false positives and limited scope of analysis which make either difficult to adopt. Over the past years, machine learning based approaches have been extensively explored for vulnerability detection, but its real-world applicability is constrained by data requirements and feature engineering challenges. Large Language Models (LLMs), with their vast parameters, have shown tremendous potential in understanding semnatics in human as well as programming languages. We dive into the efficacy of LLMs for detecting vulnerabilities in the context of Android security. We focus on building an AI-driven workflow to assist developers in identifying and rectifying vulnerabilities. Our experiments show that LLMs outperform our expectations in finding issues within applications correctly flagging insecure apps in 91.67% of cases in the Ghera benchmark. We use inferences from our experiments towards building a robust and actionable vulnerability detection system and demonstrate its effectiveness. Our experiments also shed light on how different various simple configurations can affect the True Positive (TP) and False Positive (FP) rates.

Related papers

• In-Context Experience Replay Facilitates Safety Red-Teaming of Text-to-Image Diffusion Models [97.82118821263825]
  Text-to-image (T2I) models have shown remarkable progress, but their potential to generate harmful content remains a critical concern in the ML community. We propose ICER, a novel red-teaming framework that generates interpretable and semantic meaningful problematic prompts. Our work provides crucial insights for developing more robust safety mechanisms in T2I systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T04:17:24Z)
• Jailbreaking and Mitigation of Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models [4.564507064383306]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed artificial intelligence by advancing natural language understanding and generation. Despite these advancements, LLMs have shown considerable vulnerabilities, particularly to prompt injection and jailbreaking attacks. This review analyzes the state of research on these vulnerabilities and presents available defense strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T00:00:56Z)
• RealVul: Can We Detect Vulnerabilities in Web Applications with LLM? [4.467475584754677]
  We present RealVul, the first LLM-based framework designed for PHP vulnerability detection. We can isolate potential vulnerability triggers while streamlining the code and eliminating unnecessary semantic information. We also address the issue of insufficient PHP vulnerability samples by improving data synthesis methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T03:16:34Z)
• Outside the Comfort Zone: Analysing LLM Capabilities in Software Vulnerability Detection [9.652886240532741]
  This paper thoroughly analyses large language models' capabilities in detecting vulnerabilities within source code. We evaluate the performance of six open-source models that are specifically trained for vulnerability detection against six general-purpose LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-29T10:00:57Z)
• Exploring Automatic Cryptographic API Misuse Detection in the Era of LLMs [60.32717556756674]
  This paper introduces a systematic evaluation framework to assess Large Language Models in detecting cryptographic misuses. Our in-depth analysis of 11,940 LLM-generated reports highlights that the inherent instabilities in LLMs can lead to over half of the reports being false positives. The optimized approach achieves a remarkable detection rate of nearly 90%, surpassing traditional methods and uncovering previously unknown misuses in established benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T15:31:26Z)
• Detectors for Safe and Reliable LLMs: Implementations, Uses, and Limitations [76.19419888353586]
  Large language models (LLMs) are susceptible to a variety of risks, from non-faithful output to biased and toxic generations. We present our efforts to create and deploy a library of detectors: compact and easy-to-build classification models that provide labels for various harms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-09T21:07:16Z)
• Highlighting the Safety Concerns of Deploying LLMs/VLMs in Robotics [54.57914943017522]
  We highlight the critical issues of robustness and safety associated with integrating large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs) into robotics applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T22:01:45Z)
• How Far Have We Gone in Vulnerability Detection Using Large Language Models [15.09461331135668]
  We introduce a comprehensive vulnerability benchmark VulBench. This benchmark aggregates high-quality data from a wide range of CTF challenges and real-world applications. We find that several LLMs outperform traditional deep learning approaches in vulnerability detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-21T08:20:39Z)
• Understanding the Effectiveness of Large Language Models in Detecting Security Vulnerabilities [12.82645410161464]
  We evaluate the effectiveness of 16 pre-trained Large Language Models on 5,000 code samples from five diverse security datasets. Overall, LLMs show modest effectiveness in detecting vulnerabilities, obtaining an average accuracy of 62.8% and F1 score of 0.71 across datasets. We find that advanced prompting strategies that involve step-by-step analysis significantly improve performance of LLMs on real-world datasets in terms of F1 score (by upto 0.18 on average)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T13:17:20Z)
• Increasing the Confidence of Deep Neural Networks by Coverage Analysis [71.57324258813674]
  This paper presents a lightweight monitoring architecture based on coverage paradigms to enhance the model against different unsafe inputs. Experimental results show that the proposed approach is effective in detecting both powerful adversarial examples and out-of-distribution inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-28T16:38:26Z)
• Dos and Don'ts of Machine Learning in Computer Security [74.1816306998445]
  Despite great potential, machine learning in security is prone to subtle pitfalls that undermine its performance. We identify common pitfalls in the design, implementation, and evaluation of learning-based security systems. We propose actionable recommendations to support researchers in avoiding or mitigating the pitfalls where possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T13:09:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.