ELO-Rated Sequence Rewards: Advancing Reinforcement Learning Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.03301v1
• Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 07:14:03 GMT
• Title: ELO-Rated Sequence Rewards: Advancing Reinforcement Learning Models
• Authors: Qi Ju, Falin Hei, Zhemei Fang, Yunfeng Luo,
• Abstract summary: Reinforcement Learning (RL) is highly dependent on the meticulous design of the reward function. We propose a novel reward estimation algorithm: ELO-Rating based RL (ERRL)
• Score: 3.8616427106430677
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement Learning (RL) is highly dependent on the meticulous design of the reward function. However, accurately assigning rewards to each state-action pair in Long-Term RL (LTRL) challenges is formidable. Consequently, RL agents are predominantly trained with expert guidance. Drawing on the principles of ordinal utility theory from economics, we propose a novel reward estimation algorithm: ELO-Rating based RL (ERRL). This approach is distinguished by two main features. Firstly, it leverages expert preferences over trajectories instead of cardinal rewards (utilities) to compute the ELO rating of each trajectory as its reward. Secondly, a new reward redistribution algorithm is introduced to mitigate training volatility in the absence of a fixed anchor reward. Our method demonstrates superior performance over several leading baselines in long-term scenarios (extending up to 5000 steps), where conventional RL algorithms falter. Furthermore, we conduct a thorough analysis of how expert preferences affect the outcomes.

Related papers

• R3HF: Reward Redistribution for Enhancing Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback [25.27230140274847]
  Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) provides a paradigm for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. This paper proposes a novel reward redistribution method called R3HF, which facilitates a more fine-grained, token-level reward allocation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-13T02:45:21Z)
• Beyond Simple Sum of Delayed Rewards: Non-Markovian Reward Modeling for Reinforcement Learning [44.770495418026734]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) empowers agents to acquire various skills by learning from reward signals. Traditional methods assume the existence of underlying Markovian rewards and that the observed delayed reward is simply the sum of instance-level rewards. We propose Composite Delayed Reward Transformer (CoDeTr), which incorporates a specialized in-sequence attention mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-26T13:12:27Z)
• Dense Reward for Free in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback [64.92448888346125]
  We leverage the fact that the reward model contains more information than just its scalar output. We use these attention weights to redistribute the reward along the whole completion. Empirically, we show that it stabilises training, accelerates the rate of learning, and, in practical cases, may lead to better local optima.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T17:10:35Z)
• Routing to the Expert: Efficient Reward-guided Ensemble of Large Language Models [69.51130760097818]
  We propose Zooter, a reward-guided routing method distilling rewards on training queries to train a routing function. We evaluate Zooter on a comprehensive benchmark collection with 26 subsets on different domains and tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T04:40:43Z)
• Leveraging Reward Consistency for Interpretable Feature Discovery in Reinforcement Learning [69.19840497497503]
  It is argued that the commonly used action matching principle is more like an explanation of deep neural networks (DNNs) than the interpretation of RL agents. We propose to consider rewards, the essential objective of RL agents, as the essential objective of interpreting RL agents. We verify and evaluate our method on the Atari 2600 games as well as Duckietown, a challenging self-driving car simulator environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-04T09:09:54Z)
• RL$^3$: Boosting Meta Reinforcement Learning via RL inside RL$^2$ [12.111848705677142]
  We propose RL$3$, a hybrid approach that incorporates action-values, learned per task through traditional RL, in the inputs to meta-RL. We show that RL$3$ earns greater cumulative reward in the long term, compared to RL$2$, while maintaining data-efficiency in the short term, and generalizes better to out-of-distribution tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-28T04:16:16Z)
• Reward Uncertainty for Exploration in Preference-based Reinforcement Learning [88.34958680436552]
  We present an exploration method specifically for preference-based reinforcement learning algorithms. Our main idea is to design an intrinsic reward by measuring the novelty based on learned reward. Our experiments show that exploration bonus from uncertainty in learned reward improves both feedback- and sample-efficiency of preference-based RL algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-24T23:22:10Z)
• Supervised Advantage Actor-Critic for Recommender Systems [76.7066594130961]
  We propose negative sampling strategy for training the RL component and combine it with supervised sequential learning. Based on sampled (negative) actions (items), we can calculate the "advantage" of a positive action over the average case. We instantiate SNQN and SA2C with four state-of-the-art sequential recommendation models and conduct experiments on two real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-05T12:51:15Z)
• Information Directed Reward Learning for Reinforcement Learning [64.33774245655401]
  We learn a model of the reward function that allows standard RL algorithms to achieve high expected return with as few expert queries as possible. In contrast to prior active reward learning methods designed for specific types of queries, IDRL naturally accommodates different query types. We support our findings with extensive evaluations in multiple environments and with different types of queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-24T18:46:42Z)
• Active Finite Reward Automaton Inference and Reinforcement Learning Using Queries and Counterexamples [31.31937554018045]
  Deep reinforcement learning (RL) methods require intensive data from the exploration of the environment to achieve satisfactory performance. We propose a framework that enables an RL agent to reason over its exploration process and distill high-level knowledge for effectively guiding its future explorations. Specifically, we propose a novel RL algorithm that learns high-level knowledge in the form of a finite reward automaton by using the L* learning algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-28T21:13:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.