AAAR-1.0: Assessing AI's Potential to Assist Research
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.22394v1
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 17:58:29 GMT
- Title: AAAR-1.0: Assessing AI's Potential to Assist Research
- Authors: Renze Lou, Hanzi Xu, Sijia Wang, Jiangshu Du, Ryo Kamoi, Xiaoxin Lu, Jian Xie, Yuxuan Sun, Yusen Zhang, Jihyun Janice Ahn, Hongchao Fang, Zhuoyang Zou, Wenchao Ma, Xi Li, Kai Zhang, Congying Xia, Lifu Huang, Wenpeng Yin,
- Abstract summary: We introduce AAAR-1.0, a benchmark dataset designed to evaluate large language models (LLMs) performance in three fundamental, expertise-intensive research tasks.
AAAR-1.0 differs from prior benchmarks in two key ways: first, it is explicitly research-oriented, with tasks requiring deep domain expertise; second, it is researcher-oriented, mirroring the primary activities that researchers engage in on a daily basis.
- Score: 34.88341605349765
- License:
- Abstract: Numerous studies have assessed the proficiency of AI systems, particularly large language models (LLMs), in facilitating everyday tasks such as email writing, question answering, and creative content generation. However, researchers face unique challenges and opportunities in leveraging LLMs for their own work, such as brainstorming research ideas, designing experiments, and writing or reviewing papers. In this study, we introduce AAAR-1.0, a benchmark dataset designed to evaluate LLM performance in three fundamental, expertise-intensive research tasks: (i) EquationInference, assessing the correctness of equations based on the contextual information in paper submissions; (ii) ExperimentDesign, designing experiments to validate research ideas and solutions; (iii) PaperWeakness, identifying weaknesses in paper submissions; and (iv) REVIEWCRITIQUE, identifying each segment in human reviews is deficient or not. AAAR-1.0 differs from prior benchmarks in two key ways: first, it is explicitly research-oriented, with tasks requiring deep domain expertise; second, it is researcher-oriented, mirroring the primary activities that researchers engage in on a daily basis. An evaluation of both open-source and proprietary LLMs reveals their potential as well as limitations in conducting sophisticated research tasks. We will keep iterating AAAR-1.0 to new versions.
Related papers
- MLGym: A New Framework and Benchmark for Advancing AI Research Agents [51.9387884953294]
We introduce Meta MLGym and MLGym-Bench, a new framework and benchmark for evaluating and developing large language models on AI research tasks.
This is the first Gym environment for machine learning (ML) tasks, enabling research on reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms for training such agents.
We evaluate a number of frontier large language models (LLMs) on our benchmarks such as Claude-3.5-Sonnet, Llama-3.1 405B, GPT-4o, o1-preview, and Gemini-1.5 Pro.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-20T12:28:23Z) - IdeaBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Research Idea Generation [19.66218274796796]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed how people interact with artificial intelligence (AI) systems.
We propose IdeaBench, a benchmark system that includes a comprehensive dataset and an evaluation framework.
Our dataset comprises titles and abstracts from a diverse range of influential papers, along with their referenced works.
Our evaluation framework is a two-stage process: first, using GPT-4o to rank ideas based on user-specified quality indicators such as novelty and feasibility, enabling scalable personalization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-31T17:04:59Z) - Can LLMs Generate Novel Research Ideas? A Large-Scale Human Study with 100+ NLP Researchers [90.26363107905344]
Large language models (LLMs) have sparked optimism about their potential to accelerate scientific discovery.
No evaluations have shown that LLM systems can take the very first step of producing novel, expert-level ideas.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-06T08:25:03Z) - Reconciling Methodological Paradigms: Employing Large Language Models as Novice Qualitative Research Assistants in Talent Management Research [1.0949553365997655]
This study proposes a novel approach by leveraging Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) based Large Language Models (LLMs) for analyzing interview transcripts.
The novelty of this work lies in strategizing the research inquiry as one that is augmented by an LLM that serves as a novice research assistant.
Our findings demonstrate that the LLM-augmented RAG approach can successfully extract topics of interest, with significant coverage compared to manually generated topics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-20T17:49:51Z) - LLMs Assist NLP Researchers: Critique Paper (Meta-)Reviewing [106.45895712717612]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable versatility in various generative tasks.
This study focuses on the topic of LLMs assist NLP Researchers.
To our knowledge, this is the first work to provide such a comprehensive analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-24T01:30:22Z) - ResearchArena: Benchmarking Large Language Models' Ability to Collect and Organize Information as Research Agents [21.17856299966841]
This study introduces ResearchArena, a benchmark designed to evaluate large language models (LLMs) in conducting academic surveys.
To support these opportunities, we construct an environment of 12M full-text academic papers and 7.9K survey papers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-13T03:26:30Z) - ResearchAgent: Iterative Research Idea Generation over Scientific Literature with Large Language Models [56.08917291606421]
ResearchAgent is an AI-based system for ideation and operationalization of novel work.
ResearchAgent automatically defines novel problems, proposes methods and designs experiments, while iteratively refining them.
We experimentally validate our ResearchAgent on scientific publications across multiple disciplines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-11T13:36:29Z) - Apprentices to Research Assistants: Advancing Research with Large Language Models [0.0]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools in various research domains.
This article examines their potential through a literature review and firsthand experimentation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-09T15:53:06Z) - Benchmarking Foundation Models with Language-Model-as-an-Examiner [47.345760054595246]
We propose a novel benchmarking framework, Language-Model-as-an-Examiner.
The LM serves as a knowledgeable examiner that formulates questions based on its knowledge and evaluates responses in a reference-free manner.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-07T06:29:58Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.