A Survey on Knowledge Organization Systems of Research Fields: Resources and Challenges
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.04432v2
- Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 18:03:08 GMT
- Title: A Survey on Knowledge Organization Systems of Research Fields: Resources and Challenges
- Authors: Angelo Salatino, Tanay Aggarwal, Andrea Mannocci, Francesco Osborne, Enrico Motta,
- Abstract summary: Knowledge Organization Systems (KOSs) play a fundamental role in categorising, managing, and retrieving information.
This paper aims to present a comprehensive survey of the current KOS for academic disciplines.
We analysed 45 KOSs according to five main dimensions: scope, structure, usage, and links to other KOSs.
- Score: 0.0
- License:
- Abstract: Knowledge Organization Systems (KOSs), such as term lists, thesauri, taxonomies, and ontologies, play a fundamental role in categorising, managing, and retrieving information. In the academic domain, KOSs are often adopted for representing research areas and their relationships, primarily aiming to classify research articles, academic courses, patents, books, scientific venues, domain experts, grants, software, experiment materials, and several other relevant products and agents. These structured representations of research areas, widely embraced by many academic fields, have proven effective in empowering AI-based systems to i) enhance retrievability of relevant documents, ii) enable advanced analytic solutions to quantify the impact of academic research, and iii) analyse and forecast research dynamics. This paper aims to present a comprehensive survey of the current KOS for academic disciplines. We analysed and compared 45 KOSs according to five main dimensions: scope, structure, curation, usage, and links to other KOSs. Our results reveal a very heterogeneous scenario in terms of scope, scale, quality, and usage, highlighting the need for more integrated solutions for representing research knowledge across academic fields. We conclude by discussing the main challenges and the most promising future directions.
Related papers
- Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and Evaluation [58.064940977804596]
A plethora of new AI models and tools has been proposed, promising to empower researchers and academics worldwide to conduct their research more effectively and efficiently.
Ethical concerns regarding shortcomings of these tools and potential for misuse take a particularly prominent place in our discussion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-07T18:26:45Z) - A Comprehensive Survey on Integrating Large Language Models with Knowledge-Based Methods [4.686190098233778]
The paper highlights the benefits of integrating generative AI with knowledge bases, including improved data contextualization, enhanced model accuracy, and better utilization of knowledge resources.
The findings provide a detailed overview of the current state of research, identify key gaps, and offer actionable recommendations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-19T23:25:21Z) - Ontology Embedding: A Survey of Methods, Applications and Resources [54.3453925775069]
Onologies are widely used for representing domain knowledge and meta data.
logical reasoning that can directly support are quite limited in learning, approximation and prediction.
One straightforward solution is to integrate statistical analysis and machine learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-16T14:49:19Z) - A Survey of Large Language Models for Financial Applications: Progress, Prospects and Challenges [60.546677053091685]
Large language models (LLMs) have unlocked novel opportunities for machine learning applications in the financial domain.
We explore the application of LLMs on various financial tasks, focusing on their potential to transform traditional practices and drive innovation.
We highlight this survey for categorizing the existing literature into key application areas, including linguistic tasks, sentiment analysis, financial time series, financial reasoning, agent-based modeling, and other applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-15T16:11:35Z) - SurveyAgent: A Conversational System for Personalized and Efficient Research Survey [50.04283471107001]
This paper introduces SurveyAgent, a novel conversational system designed to provide personalized and efficient research survey assistance to researchers.
SurveyAgent integrates three key modules: Knowledge Management for organizing papers, Recommendation for discovering relevant literature, and Query Answering for engaging with content on a deeper level.
Our evaluation demonstrates SurveyAgent's effectiveness in streamlining research activities, showcasing its capability to facilitate how researchers interact with scientific literature.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-09T15:01:51Z) - Exploring Automated Code Evaluation Systems and Resources for Code
Analysis: A Comprehensive Survey [1.024113475677323]
This study explores the application areas of automated code evaluation systems (AESs) and their resources.
AESs are categorized into programming contests, programming learning and education, recruitment, online compilers, and additional modules.
We briefly discuss the Aizu Online Judge platform as a real example of an AES from the perspectives of system design ( hardware and software), operation (competition and education), and research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-08T16:31:38Z) - The Quantum Frontier of Software Engineering: A Systematic Mapping Study [16.93115872272979]
Quantum software engineering (QSE) is emerging as a new discipline to enable developers to design and develop quantum programs.
This paper presents a systematic mapping study of the current state of QSE research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-31T09:26:10Z) - Fairness in Recommender Systems: Research Landscape and Future
Directions [119.67643184567623]
We review the concepts and notions of fairness that were put forward in the area in the recent past.
We present an overview of how research in this field is currently operationalized.
Overall, our analysis of recent works points to certain research gaps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-23T08:34:25Z) - The CSO Classifier: Ontology-Driven Detection of Research Topics in
Scholarly Articles [0.0]
We present a new unsupervised approach for automatically classifying research papers according to the Computer Science Ontology (CSO)
The CSO takes as input the metadata associated with a research paper (title, abstract, keywords) and returns a selection of research concepts drawn from the ontology.
The approach was evaluated on a gold standard of manually annotated articles yielding a significant improvement over alternative methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-02T09:02:32Z) - Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOPS) Workshop White Paper [50.25428141435537]
Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOps) is an emerging interdisciplinary field arising in the intersection between machine learning, big data, streaming analytics, and the management of IT operations.
Main aim of the AIOPS workshop is to bring together researchers from both academia and industry to present their experiences, results, and work in progress in this field.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-15T10:43:10Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.