Native vs Non-Native Language Prompting: A Comparative Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.07054v2
• Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2024 10:16:27 GMT
• Title: Native vs Non-Native Language Prompting: A Comparative Analysis
• Authors: Mohamed Bayan Kmainasi, Rakif Khan, Ali Ezzat Shahroor, Boushra Bendou, Maram Hasanain, Firoj Alam,
• Abstract summary: In this study, we investigate different prompting strategies (native vs. non-native) on 11 different NLP tasks associated with 12 different Arabic datasets. Our findings suggest that, on average, the non-native prompt performs the best, followed by mixed and native prompts.
• Score: 8.340817502435328
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable abilities in different fields, including standard Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. To elicit knowledge from LLMs, prompts play a key role, consisting of natural language instructions. Most open and closed source LLMs are trained on available labeled and unlabeled resources--digital content such as text, images, audio, and videos. Hence, these models have better knowledge for high-resourced languages but struggle with low-resourced languages. Since prompts play a crucial role in understanding their capabilities, the language used for prompts remains an important research question. Although there has been significant research in this area, it is still limited, and less has been explored for medium to low-resourced languages. In this study, we investigate different prompting strategies (native vs. non-native) on 11 different NLP tasks associated with 12 different Arabic datasets (9.7K data points). In total, we conducted 197 experiments involving 3 LLMs, 12 datasets, and 3 prompting strategies. Our findings suggest that, on average, the non-native prompt performs the best, followed by mixed and native prompts.

Related papers

• Enhancing Code Generation for Low-Resource Languages: No Silver Bullet [55.39571645315926]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) rely on large and diverse datasets to learn syntax, semantics, and usage patterns of programming languages. For low-resource languages, the limited availability of such data hampers the models' ability to generalize effectively. We present an empirical study investigating the effectiveness of several approaches for boosting LLMs' performance on low-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T12:23:28Z)
• Dictionary Insertion Prompting for Multilingual Reasoning on Multilingual Large Language Models [52.00446751692225]
  We present a novel and simple yet effective method called textbfDictionary textbfInsertion textbfPrompting (textbfDIP) When providing a non-English prompt, DIP looks up a word dictionary and inserts words' English counterparts into the prompt for LLMs. It then enables better translation into English and better English model thinking steps which leads to obviously better results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-02T05:10:50Z)
• Do Large Language Models Speak All Languages Equally? A Comparative Study in Low-Resource Settings [12.507989493130175]
  Large language models (LLMs) have garnered significant interest in natural language processing (NLP) Recent studies have highlighted the limitations of LLMs in low-resource languages. We present datasets for sentiment and hate speech tasks by translating from English to Bangla, Hindi, and Urdu.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T05:09:23Z)
• INDIC QA BENCHMARK: A Multilingual Benchmark to Evaluate Question Answering capability of LLMs for Indic Languages [25.402797722575805]
  Indic QA Benchmark is a dataset for context grounded question answering in 11 major Indian languages. Evaluations revealed weak performance in low resource languages due to a strong English language bias in their training data. We also investigated the Translate Test paradigm,where inputs are translated to English for processing and the results are translated back into the source language for output.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T13:57:16Z)
• LLMs Are Few-Shot In-Context Low-Resource Language Learners [59.74451570590808]
  In-context learning (ICL) empowers large language models (LLMs) to perform diverse tasks in underrepresented languages. We extensively study ICL and its cross-lingual variation (X-ICL) on 25 low-resource and 7 relatively higher-resource languages. Our study concludes the significance of few-shot in-context information on enhancing the low-resource understanding quality of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T07:55:29Z)
• Decomposed Prompting: Unveiling Multilingual Linguistic Structure Knowledge in English-Centric Large Language Models [12.700783525558721]
  English-centric Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-3 and LLaMA display a remarkable ability to perform multilingual tasks. This paper introduces the decomposed prompting approach to probe the linguistic structure understanding of these LLMs in sequence labeling tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T15:15:39Z)
• Zero-shot Sentiment Analysis in Low-Resource Languages Using a Multilingual Sentiment Lexicon [78.12363425794214]
  We focus on zero-shot sentiment analysis tasks across 34 languages, including 6 high/medium-resource languages, 25 low-resource languages, and 3 code-switching datasets. We demonstrate that pretraining using multilingual lexicons, without using any sentence-level sentiment data, achieves superior zero-shot performance compared to models fine-tuned on English sentiment datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-03T10:41:05Z)
• GlotLID: Language Identification for Low-Resource Languages [51.38634652914054]
  GlotLID-M is an LID model that satisfies the desiderata of wide coverage, reliability and efficiency. It identifies 1665 languages, a large increase in coverage compared to prior work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T23:45:57Z)
• The Belebele Benchmark: a Parallel Reading Comprehension Dataset in 122 Language Variants [80.4837840962273]
  We present Belebele, a dataset spanning 122 language variants. This dataset enables the evaluation of text models in high-, medium-, and low-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-31T17:43:08Z)
• Democratizing LLMs for Low-Resource Languages by Leveraging their English Dominant Abilities with Linguistically-Diverse Prompts [75.33019401706188]
  Large language models (LLMs) are known to effectively perform tasks by simply observing few exemplars. We propose to assemble synthetic exemplars from a diverse set of high-resource languages to prompt the LLMs to translate from any language into English. Our unsupervised prompting method performs on par with supervised few-shot learning in LLMs of different sizes for translations between English and 13 Indic and 21 African low-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T08:27:47Z)
• Low-Resource Adaptation of Neural NLP Models [0.30458514384586405]
  This thesis investigates methods for dealing with low-resource scenarios in information extraction and natural language understanding. We develop and adapt neural NLP models to explore a number of research questions concerning NLP tasks with minimal or no training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-09T12:13:55Z)
• Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Transfer with Meta Learning [45.29398184889296]
  We consider the setting of training models on multiple languages at the same time, when little or no data is available for languages other than English. We show that this challenging setup can be approached using meta-learning. We experiment using standard supervised, zero-shot cross-lingual, as well as few-shot cross-lingual settings for different natural language understanding tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-05T16:07:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.