Revisiting Static Feature-Based Android Malware Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.07397v1
• Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 16:37:50 GMT
• Title: Revisiting Static Feature-Based Android Malware Detection
• Authors: Md Tanvirul Alam, Dipkamal Bhusal, Nidhi Rastogi,
• Abstract summary: This paper highlights critical pitfalls that undermine the validity of machine learning research in Android malware detection. We propose solutions for improving datasets and methodological practices, enabling fairer model comparisons. Our paper aims to support future research in Android malware detection and other security domains, enhancing the reliability and validity of published results.
• Score: 0.8192907805418583
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The increasing reliance on machine learning (ML) in computer security, particularly for malware classification, has driven significant advancements. However, the replicability and reproducibility of these results are often overlooked, leading to challenges in verifying research findings. This paper highlights critical pitfalls that undermine the validity of ML research in Android malware detection, focusing on dataset and methodological issues. We comprehensively analyze Android malware detection using two datasets and assess offline and continual learning settings with six widely used ML models. Our study reveals that when properly tuned, simpler baseline methods can often outperform more complex models. To address reproducibility challenges, we propose solutions for improving datasets and methodological practices, enabling fairer model comparisons. Additionally, we open-source our code to facilitate malware analysis, making it extensible for new models and datasets. Our paper aims to support future research in Android malware detection and other security domains, enhancing the reliability and reproducibility of published results.

Related papers

• Breaking Focus: Contextual Distraction Curse in Large Language Models [68.4534308805202]
  We investigate a critical vulnerability in Large Language Models (LLMs) This phenomenon arises when models fail to maintain consistent performance on questions modified with semantically coherent but irrelevant context. We propose an efficient tree-based search methodology to automatically generate CDV examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T18:43:36Z)
• What Really Matters for Learning-based LiDAR-Camera Calibration [50.2608502974106]
  This paper revisits the development of learning-based LiDAR-Camera calibration. We identify the critical limitations of regression-based methods with the widely used data generation pipeline. We also investigate how the input data format and preprocessing operations impact network performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-28T14:12:32Z)
• Predicting Vulnerability to Malware Using Machine Learning Models: A Study on Microsoft Windows Machines [0.0]
  This study addresses the need for effective malware detection strategies by leveraging Machine Learning (ML) techniques. Our research aims to develop an advanced ML model that accurately predicts malware vulnerabilities based on the specific conditions of individual machines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-05T10:04:58Z)
• Underwater Object Detection in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: Current, Challenge, and Future [119.88454942558485]
  Underwater object detection (UOD) aims to identify and localise objects in underwater images or videos. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) based methods, especially deep learning methods, have shown promising performance in UOD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T00:25:33Z)
• Verification of Machine Unlearning is Fragile [48.71651033308842]
  We introduce two novel adversarial unlearning processes capable of circumventing both types of verification strategies. This study highlights the vulnerabilities and limitations in machine unlearning verification, paving the way for further research into the safety of machine unlearning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-01T21:37:10Z)
• A Survey of Malware Detection Using Deep Learning [6.349503549199403]
  This paper investigates advances in malware detection on Windows, iOS, Android, and Linux using deep learning (DL) We discuss the issues and the challenges in malware detection using DL classifiers. We examine eight popular DL approaches on various datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-27T02:49:55Z)
• The Frontier of Data Erasure: Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models [56.26002631481726]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are foundational to AI advancements. LLMs pose risks by potentially memorizing and disseminating sensitive, biased, or copyrighted information. Machine unlearning emerges as a cutting-edge solution to mitigate these concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-23T09:26:15Z)
• Comprehensive evaluation of Mal-API-2019 dataset by machine learning in malware detection [0.5475886285082937]
  This study conducts a thorough examination of malware detection using machine learning techniques. The aim is to advance cybersecurity capabilities by identifying and mitigating threats more effectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-04T17:22:43Z)
• Unraveling the Key of Machine Learning Solutions for Android Malware Detection [33.63795751798441]
  This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into machine learning-based Android malware detection. We first survey the literature, categorizing contributions into a taxonomy based on the Android feature engineering and ML modeling pipeline. Then, we design a general-propose framework for ML-based Android malware detection, re-implement 12 representative approaches from different research communities, and evaluate them from three primary dimensions, i.e. effectiveness, robustness, and efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T12:31:19Z)
• Malicious code detection in android: the role of sequence characteristics and disassembling methods [0.0]
  We investigate and emphasize the factors that may affect the accuracy values of the models managed by researchers. Our findings exhibit that the disassembly method and different input representations affect the model results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-02T11:55:05Z)
• Towards a Fair Comparison and Realistic Design and Evaluation Framework of Android Malware Detectors [63.75363908696257]
  We analyze 10 influential research works on Android malware detection using a common evaluation framework. We identify five factors that, if not taken into account when creating datasets and designing detectors, significantly affect the trained ML models. We conclude that the studied ML-based detectors have been evaluated optimistically, which justifies the good published results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T08:28:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.