Causal Language Modeling Can Elicit Search and Reasoning Capabilities on Logic Puzzles
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.10502v1
- Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 17:42:15 GMT
- Title: Causal Language Modeling Can Elicit Search and Reasoning Capabilities on Logic Puzzles
- Authors: Kulin Shah, Nishanth Dikkala, Xin Wang, Rina Panigrahy,
- Abstract summary: We study if causal language modeling can learn a complex task such as solving Sudoku puzzles.
We show that Transformer models trained on this synthetic task can indeed learn to solve Sudokus.
We also extend our analysis to Zebra puzzles (known as Einstein puzzles) and show that the model solves $92.04 %$ of the puzzles fully correctly.
- Score: 14.777731830394357
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Causal language modeling using the Transformer architecture has yielded remarkable capabilities in Large Language Models (LLMs) over the last few years. However, the extent to which fundamental search and reasoning capabilities emerged within LLMs remains a topic of ongoing debate. In this work, we study if causal language modeling can learn a complex task such as solving Sudoku puzzles. To solve a Sudoku, the model is first required to search over all empty cells of the puzzle to decide on a cell to fill and then apply an appropriate strategy to fill the decided cell. Sometimes, the application of a strategy only results in thinning down the possible values in a cell rather than concluding the exact value of the cell. In such cases, multiple strategies are applied one after the other to fill a single cell. We observe that Transformer models trained on this synthetic task can indeed learn to solve Sudokus (our model solves $94.21\%$ of the puzzles fully correctly) when trained on a logical sequence of steps taken by a solver. We find that training Transformers with the logical sequence of steps is necessary and without such training, they fail to learn Sudoku. We also extend our analysis to Zebra puzzles (known as Einstein puzzles) and show that the model solves $92.04 \%$ of the puzzles fully correctly. In addition, we study the internal representations of the trained Transformer and find that through linear probing, we can decode information about the set of possible values in any given cell from them, pointing to the presence of a strong reasoning engine implicit in the Transformer weights.
Related papers
- Provable Failure of Language Models in Learning Majority Boolean Logic via Gradient Descent [15.291830857281015]
We investigate whether Transformers can truly learn simple majority functions when trained using gradient-based methods.
Our analysis demonstrates that even after $mathrmpoly(d)$ gradient queries, the generalization error of the Transformer model still remains substantially large.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-07T03:08:12Z) - On Memorization of Large Language Models in Logical Reasoning [70.94164038947078]
Large language models (LLMs) achieve good performance on challenging reasoning benchmarks, yet could also make basic reasoning mistakes.
One hypothesis is that the increasingly high and nearly saturated performance could be due to the memorization of similar problems.
We show that fine-tuning leads to heavy memorization, but it also consistently improves generalization performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-30T15:31:54Z) - Solving Zebra Puzzles Using Constraint-Guided Multi-Agent Systems [25.0042181817455]
We introduce a multi-agent system, ZPS, that integrates Large Language Models with an off the shelf theorem prover.
This system tackles the complex puzzle-solving task by breaking down the problem into smaller, manageable parts.
We also introduce an automated grid puzzle grader to assess the correctness of our puzzle solutions and show that the automated grader is reliable by evaluating it in a user-study.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-04T14:22:25Z) - Are Language Models Puzzle Prodigies? Algorithmic Puzzles Unveil Serious
Challenges in Multimodal Reasoning [24.386388107656334]
This paper introduces the novel task of multimodal puzzle solving, framed within the context of visual question-answering.
We present a new dataset, AlgoVQA, designed to challenge and evaluate the capabilities of multimodal language models in solving algorithmic puzzles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-06T17:15:04Z) - Limits of Transformer Language Models on Learning to Compose Algorithms [77.2443883991608]
We evaluate training LLaMA models and prompting GPT-4 and Gemini on four tasks demanding to learn a composition of several discrete sub-tasks.
Our results indicate that compositional learning in state-of-the-art Transformer language models is highly sample inefficient.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-08T16:23:29Z) - Understanding Addition in Transformers [2.07180164747172]
This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of a one-layer Transformer model trained to perform n-digit integer addition.
Our findings suggest that the model dissects the task into parallel streams dedicated to individual digits, employing varied algorithms tailored to different positions within the digits.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-19T19:34:42Z) - Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionality [109.79516190693415]
We investigate the limits of transformer large language models across three representative compositional tasks.
These tasks require breaking problems down into sub-steps and synthesizing these steps into a precise answer.
Our empirical findings suggest that transformer LLMs solve compositional tasks by reducing multi-step compositional reasoning into linearized subgraph matching.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-29T23:24:14Z) - Are Deep Neural Networks SMARTer than Second Graders? [85.60342335636341]
We evaluate the abstraction, deduction, and generalization abilities of neural networks in solving visuo-linguistic puzzles designed for children in the 6--8 age group.
Our dataset consists of 101 unique puzzles; each puzzle comprises a picture question, and their solution needs a mix of several elementary skills, including arithmetic, algebra, and spatial reasoning.
Experiments reveal that while powerful deep models offer reasonable performances on puzzles in a supervised setting, they are not better than random accuracy when analyzed for generalization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-20T04:33:32Z) - Transformers Learn Shortcuts to Automata [52.015990420075944]
We find that a low-depth Transformer can represent the computations of any finite-state automaton.
We show that a Transformer with $O(log T)$ layers can exactly replicate the computation of an automaton on an input sequence of length $T$.
We further investigate the brittleness of these solutions and propose potential mitigations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-19T17:45:48Z) - GANzzle: Reframing jigsaw puzzle solving as a retrieval task using a
generative mental image [15.132848477903314]
We infer a mental image from all pieces, which a given piece can then be matched against avoiding the explosion.
We learn how to reconstruct the image given a set of unordered pieces, allowing the model to learn a joint embedding space to match an encoding of each piece to the cropped layer of the generator.
In doing so our model is puzzle size agnostic, in contrast to prior deep learning methods which are single size.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-12T16:02:00Z) - PuzzLing Machines: A Challenge on Learning From Small Data [64.513459448362]
We introduce a challenge on learning from small data, PuzzLing Machines, which consists of Rosetta Stone puzzles from Linguistic Olympiads for high school students.
Our challenge contains around 100 puzzles covering a wide range of linguistic phenomena from 81 languages.
We show that both simple statistical algorithms and state-of-the-art deep neural models perform inadequately on this challenge, as expected.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-27T20:34:26Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.