Violation of no-signaling on a public quantum computer

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.11348v1
• Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 16:51:52 GMT
• Title: Violation of no-signaling on a public quantum computer
• Authors: Tomasz Rybotycki, Tomasz Białecki, Josep Batle, Adam Bednorz,
• Abstract summary: We have tested no-signaling in bipartite systems of qubits from IBM Quantum devices in extremely large statistics. Although the time and space scales of IBM Quantum cannot in principle rule out subluminal communications, there is no obvious physical mechanism leading to signaling.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: No-signaling is a consequence of the no-communication theorem that states that bipartite systems cannot transfer information unless a communication channel exists. It is also a by-product of the assumptions of Bell theorem about quantum nonlocality. We have tested no-signaling in bipartite systems of qubits from IBM Quantum devices in extremely large statistics, resulting in significant violations. Although the time and space scales of IBM Quantum cannot in principle rule out subluminal communications, there is no obvious physical mechanism leading to signaling. The violation is also at similar level as observed in Bell tests. It is therefore mandatory to check possible technical imperfections that may cause the violation and to repeat the loophole-free Bell test at much larger statistics, in order to be ruled out definitively at strict spacelike conditions.

Related papers

• Measurement-Device-Independent Detection of Beyond-Quantum State [53.64687146666141]
  We propose a measurement-device-independent (MDI) test for beyond-quantum state detection. We discuss the importance of tomographic completeness of the input sets to the detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-11T06:40:13Z)
• Nondestructive discrimination of Bell states between distant parties [3.3764180740316543]
  We present a scheme for discriminating an arbitrary Bell state distributed to two distant parties without destroying it. We show that our scheme can surpass classical bounds when applied to practical quantum processor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-02T08:54:34Z)
• Bell inequalities with overlapping measurements [52.81011822909395]
  We study Bell inequalities where measurements of different parties can have overlap. This allows to accommodate problems in quantum information. The scenarios considered show an interesting behaviour with respect to Hilbert space dimension, overlap, and symmetry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-03T18:11:05Z)
• Protecting quantum entanglement between error-corrected logical qubits [21.656211734079996]
  We experimentally realize entangled logical qubits (ELQ) with a bosonic quantum module by encoding quantum information into spatially separated microwave modes. The coherence time of the purified ELQ via error detection is improved by 45$%$ compared with the unprotected ELQ. In addition, violation of the Bell inequality by logical qubits is demonstrated for the first time with the measured Bell signal B=2.250$pm$0.019 after purification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-25T08:57:28Z)
• Experimental limit on non-linear state-dependent terms in quantum theory [110.83289076967895]
  We implement blinded measurement and data analysis with three control bit strings. Control of systematic effects is realized by producing one of the control bit strings with a classical random-bit generator. Our measurements find no evidence for electromagnetic quantum state-dependent non-linearity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-25T18:00:03Z)
• From no-signalling to quantum states [0.0]
  Characterising quantum correlations from physical principles is a central problem in the field of quantum information theory. We suggest a natural generalisation of no-signalling in the form of no-disturbance to dilated systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-25T07:06:17Z)
• Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
  We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world. We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z)
• Transmon platform for quantum computing challenged by chaotic fluctuations [55.41644538483948]
  We investigate the stability of a variant of a many-body localized (MBL) phase for system parameters relevant to current quantum processors. We find that these computing platforms are dangerously close to a phase of uncontrollable chaotic fluctuations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T19:00:03Z)
• Fault-tolerant Coding for Quantum Communication [71.206200318454]
  encode and decode circuits to reliably send messages over many uses of a noisy channel. For every quantum channel $T$ and every $eps>0$ there exists a threshold $p(epsilon,T)$ for the gate error probability below which rates larger than $C-epsilon$ are fault-tolerantly achievable. Our results are relevant in communication over large distances, and also on-chip, where distant parts of a quantum computer might need to communicate under higher levels of noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-15T15:10:50Z)
• Single trusted qubit is necessary and sufficient for quantum realisation of extremal no-signaling correlations [0.2085467441379275]
  We show that quantum statistics can never reproduce an extremal non-local point within the set of no-signaling boxes. We prove a positive result showing that already a single trusted qubit is enough for quantum theory to produce a self-testable extremal point.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-30T13:52:01Z)
• The Schmidt number of a quantum state cannot always be device-independently certified [0.0]
  We show that there exist quantum states, whose entanglement content, as measured by the Schmidt number, cannot be device-independently certified for all possible sequential measurements on any number of copies. While the bigger question: textitcan the presence of entanglement always be device-independently certified? remains open, we provide proof that quantifying entanglement device-independently is not always possible, even beyond the standard Bell scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-31T13:28:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.