Unrolled denoising networks provably learn optimal Bayesian inference
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12947v1
- Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 17:56:16 GMT
- Title: Unrolled denoising networks provably learn optimal Bayesian inference
- Authors: Aayush Karan, Kulin Shah, Sitan Chen, Yonina C. Eldar,
- Abstract summary: We prove the first rigorous learning guarantees for neural networks based on unrolling approximate message passing (AMP)
For compressed sensing, we prove that when trained on data drawn from a product prior, the layers of the network converge to the same denoisers used in Bayes AMP.
- Score: 54.79172096306631
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Much of Bayesian inference centers around the design of estimators for inverse problems which are optimal assuming the data comes from a known prior. But what do these optimality guarantees mean if the prior is unknown? In recent years, algorithm unrolling has emerged as deep learning's answer to this age-old question: design a neural network whose layers can in principle simulate iterations of inference algorithms and train on data generated by the unknown prior. Despite its empirical success, however, it has remained unclear whether this method can provably recover the performance of its optimal, prior-aware counterparts. In this work, we prove the first rigorous learning guarantees for neural networks based on unrolling approximate message passing (AMP). For compressed sensing, we prove that when trained on data drawn from a product prior, the layers of the network approximately converge to the same denoisers used in Bayes AMP. We also provide extensive numerical experiments for compressed sensing and rank-one matrix estimation demonstrating the advantages of our unrolled architecture - in addition to being able to obliviously adapt to general priors, it exhibits improvements over Bayes AMP in more general settings of low dimensions, non-Gaussian designs, and non-product priors.
Related papers
- The Cascaded Forward Algorithm for Neural Network Training [61.06444586991505]
We propose a new learning framework for neural networks, namely Cascaded Forward (CaFo) algorithm, which does not rely on BP optimization as that in FF.
Unlike FF, our framework directly outputs label distributions at each cascaded block, which does not require generation of additional negative samples.
In our framework each block can be trained independently, so it can be easily deployed into parallel acceleration systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-17T02:01:11Z) - Robust Learning of Parsimonious Deep Neural Networks [0.0]
We propose a simultaneous learning and pruning algorithm capable of identifying and eliminating irrelevant structures in a neural network.
We derive a novel hyper-prior distribution over the prior parameters that is crucial for their optimal selection.
We evaluate the proposed algorithm on the MNIST data set and commonly used fully connected and convolutional LeNet architectures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-10T03:38:55Z) - Transformers Can Do Bayesian Inference [56.99390658880008]
We present Prior-Data Fitted Networks (PFNs)
PFNs leverage in-context learning in large-scale machine learning techniques to approximate a large set of posteriors.
We demonstrate that PFNs can near-perfectly mimic Gaussian processes and also enable efficient Bayesian inference for intractable problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-20T13:07:39Z) - Optimization-Based Separations for Neural Networks [57.875347246373956]
We show that gradient descent can efficiently learn ball indicator functions using a depth 2 neural network with two layers of sigmoidal activations.
This is the first optimization-based separation result where the approximation benefits of the stronger architecture provably manifest in practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-04T18:07:47Z) - Mixtures of Laplace Approximations for Improved Post-Hoc Uncertainty in
Deep Learning [24.3370326359959]
We propose to predict with a Gaussian mixture model posterior that consists of a weighted sum of Laplace approximations of independently trained deep neural networks.
We theoretically validate that our approach mitigates overconfidence "far away" from the training data and empirically compare against state-of-the-art baselines on standard uncertainty quantification benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-05T15:52:48Z) - The Promises and Pitfalls of Deep Kernel Learning [13.487684503022063]
We identify pathological behavior, including overfitting, on a simple toy example.
We explore this pathology, explaining its origins and considering how it applies to real datasets.
We find that a fully Bayesian treatment of deep kernel learning can rectify this overfitting and obtain the desired performance improvements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-24T07:56:49Z) - Exploring the Uncertainty Properties of Neural Networks' Implicit Priors
in the Infinite-Width Limit [47.324627920761685]
We use recent theoretical advances that characterize the function-space prior to an ensemble of infinitely-wide NNs as a Gaussian process.
This gives us a better understanding of the implicit prior NNs place on function space.
We also examine the calibration of previous approaches to classification with the NNGP.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-14T18:41:54Z) - Revisiting Initialization of Neural Networks [72.24615341588846]
We propose a rigorous estimation of the global curvature of weights across layers by approximating and controlling the norm of their Hessian matrix.
Our experiments on Word2Vec and the MNIST/CIFAR image classification tasks confirm that tracking the Hessian norm is a useful diagnostic tool.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-20T18:12:56Z) - MSE-Optimal Neural Network Initialization via Layer Fusion [68.72356718879428]
Deep neural networks achieve state-of-the-art performance for a range of classification and inference tasks.
The use of gradient combined nonvolutionity renders learning susceptible to novel problems.
We propose fusing neighboring layers of deeper networks that are trained with random variables.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-28T18:25:15Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.