Enhancing Guardrails for Safe and Secure Healthcare AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.17190v1
• Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 06:30:06 GMT
• Title: Enhancing Guardrails for Safe and Secure Healthcare AI
• Authors: Ananya Gangavarapu,
• Abstract summary: I propose enhancements to existing guardrails frameworks, such as Nvidia NeMo Guardrails, to better suit healthcare-specific needs. I aim to ensure the secure, reliable, and accurate use of AI in healthcare, mitigating misinformation risks and improving patient safety.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Generative AI holds immense promise in addressing global healthcare access challenges, with numerous innovative applications now ready for use across various healthcare domains. However, a significant barrier to the widespread adoption of these domain-specific AI solutions is the lack of robust safety mechanisms to effectively manage issues such as hallucination, misinformation, and ensuring truthfulness. Left unchecked, these risks can compromise patient safety and erode trust in healthcare AI systems. While general-purpose frameworks like Llama Guard are useful for filtering toxicity and harmful content, they do not fully address the stringent requirements for truthfulness and safety in healthcare contexts. This paper examines the unique safety and security challenges inherent to healthcare AI, particularly the risk of hallucinations, the spread of misinformation, and the need for factual accuracy in clinical settings. I propose enhancements to existing guardrails frameworks, such as Nvidia NeMo Guardrails, to better suit healthcare-specific needs. By strengthening these safeguards, I aim to ensure the secure, reliable, and accurate use of AI in healthcare, mitigating misinformation risks and improving patient safety.

Related papers

• Towards Safe AI Clinicians: A Comprehensive Study on Large Language Model Jailbreaking in Healthcare [15.438265972219869]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly utilized in healthcare applications. This study systematically assesses the vulnerabilities of six LLMs to three advanced black-box jailbreaking techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-27T22:07:52Z)
• Open Problems in Machine Unlearning for AI Safety [61.43515658834902]
  Machine unlearning -- the ability to selectively forget or suppress specific types of knowledge -- has shown promise for privacy and data removal tasks. In this paper, we identify key limitations that prevent unlearning from serving as a comprehensive solution for AI safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T03:59:10Z)
• Safeguarding Virtual Healthcare: A Novel Attacker-Centric Model for Data Security and Privacy [3.537571223616615]
  Remote healthcare delivery has introduced significant security and privacy risks to protected health information (PHI) This study investigates the root causes of such security incidents and introduces the Attacker-Centric Approach (ACA) ACA addresses limitations in existing threat models and regulatory frameworks by adopting a holistic attacker-focused perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T02:21:53Z)
• Global Challenge for Safe and Secure LLMs Track 1 [57.08717321907755]
  The Global Challenge for Safe and Secure Large Language Models (LLMs) is a pioneering initiative organized by AI Singapore (AISG) and the CyberSG R&D Programme Office (CRPO) This paper introduces the Global Challenge for Safe and Secure Large Language Models (LLMs), a pioneering initiative organized by AI Singapore (AISG) and the CyberSG R&D Programme Office (CRPO) to foster the development of advanced defense mechanisms against automated jailbreaking attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T08:20:31Z)
• SoK: Security and Privacy Risks of Medical AI [14.592921477833848]
  The integration of technology and healthcare has ushered in a new era where software systems, powered by artificial intelligence and machine learning, have become essential components of medical products and services. This paper explores the security and privacy threats posed by AI/ML applications in healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-11T16:59:58Z)
• Safety challenges of AI in medicine in the era of large language models [23.817939398729955]
  Large language models (LLMs) offer new opportunities for medical practitioners, patients, and researchers. As AI and LLMs become more powerful and especially achieve superhuman performance in some medical tasks, public concerns over their safety have intensified. This review examines emerging risks in AI utilization during the LLM era.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-11T13:47:47Z)
• AI Risk Management Should Incorporate Both Safety and Security [185.68738503122114]
  We argue that stakeholders in AI risk management should be aware of the nuances, synergies, and interplay between safety and security. We introduce a unified reference framework to clarify the differences and interplay between AI safety and AI security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T21:00:47Z)
• Towards Comprehensive Post Safety Alignment of Large Language Models via Safety Patching [74.62818936088065]
  textscSafePatching is a novel framework for comprehensive PSA. textscSafePatching achieves a more comprehensive PSA than baseline methods. textscSafePatching demonstrates its superiority in continual PSA scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T16:51:07Z)
• Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems [88.80306881112313]
  We will introduce and define a family of approaches to AI safety, which we will refer to as guaranteed safe (GS) AI. The core feature of these approaches is that they aim to produce AI systems which are equipped with high-assurance quantitative safety guarantees. We outline a number of approaches for creating each of these three core components, describe the main technical challenges, and suggest a number of potential solutions to them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T17:38:32Z)
• White paper on cybersecurity in the healthcare sector. The HEIR solution [1.3717071154980571]
  Patient data, including medical records and financial information, are at risk, potentially leading to identity theft and patient safety concerns. The HEIR project offers a comprehensive cybersecurity approach, promoting security features from various regulatory frameworks. These measures aim to enhance digital health security and protect sensitive patient data while facilitating secure data access and privacy-aware techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T07:27:57Z)
• Foveate, Attribute, and Rationalize: Towards Physically Safe and Trustworthy AI [76.28956947107372]
  Covertly unsafe text is an area of particular interest, as such text may arise from everyday scenarios and are challenging to detect as harmful. We propose FARM, a novel framework leveraging external knowledge for trustworthy rationale generation in the context of safety. Our experiments show that FARM obtains state-of-the-art results on the SafeText dataset, showing absolute improvement in safety classification accuracy by 5.9%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T17:51:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.