Autoregressive Policy Optimization for Constrained Allocation Tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.18735v1
• Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 13:27:15 GMT
• Title: Autoregressive Policy Optimization for Constrained Allocation Tasks
• Authors: David Winkel, Niklas Strauß, Maximilian Bernhard, Zongyue Li, Thomas Seidl, Matthias Schubert,
• Abstract summary: We propose a new method for constrained allocation tasks based on an autoregressive process to sequentially sample allocations for each entity. In addition, we introduce a novel de-biasing mechanism to counter the initial bias caused by sequential sampling.
• Score: 4.316765170255551
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Allocation tasks represent a class of problems where a limited amount of resources must be allocated to a set of entities at each time step. Prominent examples of this task include portfolio optimization or distributing computational workloads across servers. Allocation tasks are typically bound by linear constraints describing practical requirements that have to be strictly fulfilled at all times. In portfolio optimization, for example, investors may be obligated to allocate less than 30\% of the funds into a certain industrial sector in any investment period. Such constraints restrict the action space of allowed allocations in intricate ways, which makes learning a policy that avoids constraint violations difficult. In this paper, we propose a new method for constrained allocation tasks based on an autoregressive process to sequentially sample allocations for each entity. In addition, we introduce a novel de-biasing mechanism to counter the initial bias caused by sequential sampling. We demonstrate the superior performance of our approach compared to a variety of Constrained Reinforcement Learning (CRL) methods on three distinct constrained allocation tasks: portfolio optimization, computational workload distribution, and a synthetic allocation benchmark. Our code is available at: https://github.com/niklasdbs/paspo

Related papers

• Generalization Bounds of Surrogate Policies for Combinatorial Optimization Problems [61.580419063416734]
  A recent stream of structured learning approaches has improved the practical state of the art for a range of optimization problems. The key idea is to exploit the statistical distribution over instances instead of dealing with instances separately. In this article, we investigate methods that smooth the risk by perturbing the policy, which eases optimization and improves the generalization error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T12:00:30Z)
• Simplex Decomposition for Portfolio Allocation Constraints in Reinforcement Learning [4.1573460459258245]
  We propose a novel approach to handle allocation constraints based on a decomposition of the constraint action space into a set of unconstrained allocation problems. We show that the action space of the task is equivalent to the decomposed action space, and introduce a new reinforcement learning (RL) approach CAOSD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T16:00:59Z)
• Efficient Constraint Generation for Stochastic Shortest Path Problems [0.0]
  We present an efficient version of constraint generation for Shortest Path Problems (SSPs) This technique allows algorithms to ignore sub-optimal actions and avoid computing their costs-to-go. Our experiments show that CG-iLAO* ignores up to 57% of iLAO*'s actions and it solves problems up to 8x and 3x faster than LRTDP and iLAO*.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-26T04:00:07Z)
• Amortizing intractable inference in large language models [56.92471123778389]
  We use amortized Bayesian inference to sample from intractable posterior distributions. We empirically demonstrate that this distribution-matching paradigm of LLM fine-tuning can serve as an effective alternative to maximum-likelihood training. As an important application, we interpret chain-of-thought reasoning as a latent variable modeling problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-06T16:36:08Z)
• Quantization for decentralized learning under subspace constraints [61.59416703323886]
  We consider decentralized optimization problems where agents have individual cost functions to minimize subject to subspace constraints. We propose and study an adaptive decentralized strategy where the agents employ differential randomized quantizers to compress their estimates. The analysis shows that, under some general conditions on the quantization noise, the strategy is stable both in terms of mean-square error and average bit rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-16T09:38:38Z)
• Towards Deployment-Efficient Reinforcement Learning: Lower Bound and Optimality [141.89413461337324]
  Deployment efficiency is an important criterion for many real-world applications of reinforcement learning (RL) We propose a theoretical formulation for deployment-efficient RL (DE-RL) from an "optimization with constraints" perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-14T01:31:46Z)
• A new perspective on classification: optimally allocating limited resources to uncertain tasks [4.169130102668252]
  In credit card fraud detection, for instance, a bank can only assign a small subset of transactions to their fraud investigations team. We argue that using classification to address task uncertainty is inherently suboptimal as it does not take into account the available capacity. We present a novel solution using learning to rank by directly optimizing the assignment's expected profit given limited capacity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-09T10:14:45Z)
• Math Programming based Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Echelon Inventory Management [1.9161790404101895]
  Reinforcement learning has lead to considerable break-throughs in diverse areas such as robotics, games and many others. But the application to RL in complex real-world decision making problems remains limited. These characteristics make the problem considerably harder to solve for existing RL methods that rely on enumeration techniques to solve per step action problems. We show that a properly selected discretization of the underlying uncertain distribution can yield near optimal actor policy even with very few samples from the underlying uncertainty. We find that PARL outperforms commonly used base stock by 44.7% and the best performing RL method by up to 12.1% on average
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-04T01:40:34Z)
• Shortest-Path Constrained Reinforcement Learning for Sparse Reward Tasks [59.419152768018506]
  We show that any optimal policy necessarily satisfies the k-SP constraint. We propose a novel cost function that penalizes the policy violating SP constraint, instead of completely excluding it. Our experiments on MiniGrid, DeepMind Lab, Atari, and Fetch show that the proposed method significantly improves proximal policy optimization (PPO)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-13T21:39:21Z)
• Dynamic Multi-Robot Task Allocation under Uncertainty and Temporal Constraints [52.58352707495122]
  We present a multi-robot allocation algorithm that decouples the key computational challenges of sequential decision-making under uncertainty and multi-agent coordination. We validate our results over a wide range of simulations on two distinct domains: multi-arm conveyor belt pick-and-place and multi-drone delivery dispatch in a city.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-27T01:10:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.