Towards Automated Patent Workflows: AI-Orchestrated Multi-Agent Framework for Intellectual Property Management and Analysis
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.19006v2
- Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:46:32 GMT
- Title: Towards Automated Patent Workflows: AI-Orchestrated Multi-Agent Framework for Intellectual Property Management and Analysis
- Authors: Sakhinana Sagar Srinivas, Vijay Sri Vaikunth, Venkataramana Runkana,
- Abstract summary: PatExpert is an autonomous multi-agent conversational framework designed to streamline and optimize patent-related tasks.
The framework consists of a metaagent that coordinates task-specific expert agents for various patent-related tasks and a critique agent for error handling and feedback provision.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Patents are the currency of innovation, and like any currency, they need to be managed and protected (Gavin Potenza). Patents, as legal documents that secure intellectual property rights, play a critical role in technological innovation. The growing complexity of patent documents and the surge in patent applications have created a need for automated solutions in patent analysis. In this work, we present PatExpert, an autonomous multi-agent conversational framework designed to streamline and optimize patent-related tasks. The framework consists of a metaagent that coordinates task-specific expert agents for various patent-related tasks and a critique agent for error handling and feedback provision. The meta-agent orchestrates specialized expert agents, each fine-tuned for specific tasks such as patent classification, acceptance, claim generation, abstractive summarization, multi-patent analysis, and scientific hypothesis generation. For multi-patent analysis, the framework incorporates advanced methods like Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation (GRAG) to enhance response accuracy and relevance by combining semantic similarity with knowledge graphs. Error handling is managed by critique agents (Gold-LLM-as-a-Judge and Reward-LLM-as-a-Judge), which evaluate output responses for accuracy and provide iterative feedback. The framework also prioritizes explainability, ensuring transparent justifications for decisions made during patent analysis. Its comprehensive capabilities make it a valuable tool for automating complex patent workflows, enhancing efficiency, accuracy, and compliance in patent-related tasks. Empirical evidence demonstrates significant improvements in patent processing tasks, concluding that the framework offers a robust solution for automating and optimizing patent analysis.
Related papers
- Towards Human-Level Understanding of Complex Process Engineering Schematics: A Pedagogical, Introspective Multi-Agent Framework for Open-Domain Question Answering [0.0]
In the chemical and process industries, Process Flow Diagrams (PFDs) and Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs) are critical for design, construction, and maintenance.
Recent advancements in Generative AI have shown promise in understanding and interpreting process diagrams for Visual Question Answering (VQA)
We propose a secure, on-premises enterprise solution using a hierarchical, multi-agent Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-24T19:34:04Z) - Structural Representation Learning and Disentanglement for Evidential Chinese Patent Approval Prediction [19.287231890434718]
This paper presents the pioneering effort on this task using a retrieval-based classification approach.
We propose a novel framework called DiSPat, which focuses on structural representation learning and disentanglement.
Our framework surpasses state-of-the-art baselines on patent approval prediction, while also exhibiting enhanced evidentiality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-23T05:44:16Z) - Networks of Networks: Complexity Class Principles Applied to Compound AI Systems Design [63.24275274981911]
Compound AI Systems consisting of many language model inference calls are increasingly employed.
In this work, we construct systems, which we call Networks of Networks (NoNs) organized around the distinction between generating a proposed answer and verifying its correctness.
We introduce a verifier-based judge NoN with K generators, an instantiation of "best-of-K" or "judge-based" compound AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-23T20:40:37Z) - A Comprehensive Survey on AI-based Methods for Patents [14.090575139188422]
AI-based tools present opportunities to streamline and enhance important tasks in the patent cycle.
This interdisciplinary survey aims to serve as a resource for researchers and practitioners working at the intersection of AI and patent analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-02T20:44:06Z) - Natural Language Processing in Patents: A Survey [0.0]
Patents, encapsulating crucial technical and legal information, present a rich domain for natural language processing (NLP) applications.
As NLP technologies evolve, large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated outstanding capabilities in general text processing and generation tasks.
This paper aims to equip NLP researchers with the essential knowledge to navigate this complex domain efficiently.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-06T23:17:16Z) - Unveiling Black-boxes: Explainable Deep Learning Models for Patent
Classification [48.5140223214582]
State-of-the-art methods for multi-label patent classification rely on deep opaque neural networks (DNNs)
We propose a novel deep explainable patent classification framework by introducing layer-wise relevance propagation (LRP)
Considering the relevance score, we then generate explanations by visualizing relevant words for the predicted patent class.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-31T14:11:37Z) - Towards a Complete Metamorphic Testing Pipeline [56.75969180129005]
Metamorphic Testing (MT) addresses the test oracle problem by examining the relationships between input-output pairs in consecutive executions of the System Under Test (SUT)
These relations, known as Metamorphic Relations (MRs), specify the expected output changes resulting from specific input changes.
Our research aims to develop methods and tools that assist testers in generating MRs, defining constraints, and providing explainability for MR outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-30T10:49:22Z) - A General Framework for Verification and Control of Dynamical Models via Certificate Synthesis [54.959571890098786]
We provide a framework to encode system specifications and define corresponding certificates.
We present an automated approach to formally synthesise controllers and certificates.
Our approach contributes to the broad field of safe learning for control, exploiting the flexibility of neural networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-12T09:37:26Z) - Patent Sentiment Analysis to Highlight Patent Paragraphs [0.0]
Given a patent document, identifying distinct semantic annotations is an interesting research aspect.
In the process of manual patent analysis, to attain better readability, recognising the semantic information by marking paragraphs is in practice.
This work assist patent practitioners in highlighting semantic information automatically and aid to create a sustainable and efficient patent analysis using the aptitude of Machine Learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-06T13:28:29Z) - Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space [62.997667081978825]
Counterfactual explanations aim to provide to end users a set of features that need to be changed in order to achieve a desired outcome.
Current approaches rarely take into account the feasibility of actions needed to achieve the proposed explanations.
We present Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space (CEILS), a methodology to generate counterfactual explanations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-14T20:48:48Z) - An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive
qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence.
The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.