Strategic Collusion of LLM Agents: Market Division in Multi-Commodity Competitions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.00031v1
• Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:10:40 GMT
• Title: Strategic Collusion of LLM Agents: Market Division in Multi-Commodity Competitions
• Authors: Ryan Y. Lin, Siddhartha Ojha, Kevin Cai, Maxwell F. Chen,
• Abstract summary: Machine-learning technologies are seeing increased deployment in real-world market scenarios. We explore the strategic behaviors of large language models (LLMs) when deployed as autonomous agents in multi-commodity markets.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Machine-learning technologies are seeing increased deployment in real-world market scenarios. In this work, we explore the strategic behaviors of large language models (LLMs) when deployed as autonomous agents in multi-commodity markets, specifically within Cournot competition frameworks. We examine whether LLMs can independently engage in anti-competitive practices such as collusion or, more specifically, market division. Our findings demonstrate that LLMs can effectively monopolize specific commodities by dynamically adjusting their pricing and resource allocation strategies, thereby maximizing profitability without direct human input or explicit collusion commands. These results pose unique challenges and opportunities for businesses looking to integrate AI into strategic roles and for regulatory bodies tasked with maintaining fair and competitive markets. The study provides a foundation for further exploration into the ramifications of deferring high-stakes decisions to LLM-based agents.

Related papers

• An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behavior Through LLMs [0.0]
  This study explores the potential of large language models (LLMs) to conduct market experiments. We model the behavior of market agents in a controlled experimental setting, assessing their ability to converge toward competitive equilibria.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-12T18:50:13Z)
• Cooperate or Collapse: Emergence of Sustainable Cooperation in a Society of LLM Agents [101.17919953243107]
  GovSim is a generative simulation platform designed to study strategic interactions and cooperative decision-making in large language models (LLMs) We find that all but the most powerful LLM agents fail to achieve a sustainable equilibrium in GovSim, with the highest survival rate below 54%. We show that agents that leverage "Universalization"-based reasoning, a theory of moral thinking, are able to achieve significantly better sustainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-25T15:59:16Z)
• K-Level Reasoning: Establishing Higher Order Beliefs in Large Language Models for Strategic Reasoning [76.3114831562989]
  It requires Large Language Model (LLM) agents to adapt their strategies dynamically in multi-agent environments. We propose a novel framework: "K-Level Reasoning with Large Language Models (K-R)"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T16:07:05Z)
• Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is: Evaluating Strategic Planning and Execution of LLM Agents in an Auction Arena [25.865825113847404]
  We introduce AucArena, a novel evaluation suite that simulates auctions. We conduct controlled experiments using state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs) to power bidding agents to benchmark their planning and execution skills.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T14:22:09Z)
• Cooperation, Competition, and Maliciousness: LLM-Stakeholders Interactive Negotiation [52.930183136111864]
  We propose using scorable negotiation to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) To reach an agreement, agents must have strong arithmetic, inference, exploration, and planning capabilities. We provide procedures to create new games and increase games' difficulty to have an evolving benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T13:33:06Z)
• IMM: An Imitative Reinforcement Learning Approach with Predictive Representation Learning for Automatic Market Making [33.23156884634365]
  Reinforcement Learning technology has achieved remarkable success in quantitative trading. Most existing RL-based market making methods focus on optimizing single-price level strategies. We propose Imitative Market Maker (IMM), a novel RL framework leveraging both knowledge from suboptimal signal-based experts and direct policy interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-17T11:04:09Z)
• AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents [88.45506148281379]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming increasingly smart and autonomous, targeting real-world pragmatic missions beyond traditional NLP tasks. We present AgentBench, a benchmark that currently consists of 8 distinct environments to assess LLM-as-Agent's reasoning and decision-making abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T16:08:11Z)
• Towards Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning driven Over-The-Counter Market Simulations [16.48389671789281]
  We study a game between liquidity provider and liquidity taker agents interacting in an over-the-counter market. By playing against each other, our deep-reinforcement-learning-driven agents learn emergent behaviors. We show convergence rates for our multi-agent policy gradient algorithm under a transitivity assumption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-13T17:06:08Z)
• Stochastic Market Games [10.979093424231532]
  We propose to utilize market forces to provide incentives for agents to become cooperative. As demonstrated in an iterated version of the Prisoner's Dilemma, the proposed market formulation can change the dynamics of the game. We empirically find that the presence of markets can improve both the overall result and agent individual returns via their trading activities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-15T10:37:16Z)
• Deep Q-Learning Market Makers in a Multi-Agent Simulated Stock Market [58.720142291102135]
  This paper focuses precisely on the study of these markets makers strategies from an agent-based perspective. We propose the application of Reinforcement Learning (RL) for the creation of intelligent market markers in simulated stock markets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-08T14:55:21Z)
• Decentralized Reinforcement Learning: Global Decision-Making via Local Economic Transactions [80.49176924360499]
  We establish a framework for directing a society of simple, specialized, self-interested agents to solve sequential decision problems. We derive a class of decentralized reinforcement learning algorithms. We demonstrate the potential advantages of a society's inherent modular structure for more efficient transfer learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-05T16:41:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.