Survey of Security and Data Attacks on Machine Unlearning In Financial and E-Commerce

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.00055v1
• Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 00:30:36 GMT
• Title: Survey of Security and Data Attacks on Machine Unlearning In Financial and E-Commerce
• Authors: Carl E. J. Brodzinski,
• Abstract summary: This paper surveys the landscape of security and data attacks on machine unlearning, with a focus on financial and e-commerce applications. To mitigate these risks, various defense strategies are examined, including differential privacy, robust cryptographic guarantees, and Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) This survey highlights the need for continued research and innovation in secure machine unlearning, as well as the importance of developing strong defenses against evolving attack vectors.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper surveys the landscape of security and data attacks on machine unlearning, with a focus on financial and e-commerce applications. We discuss key privacy threats such as Membership Inference Attacks and Data Reconstruction Attacks, where adversaries attempt to infer or reconstruct data that should have been removed. In addition, we explore security attacks including Machine Unlearning Data Poisoning, Unlearning Request Attacks, and Machine Unlearning Jailbreak Attacks, which target the underlying mechanisms of unlearning to manipulate or corrupt the model. To mitigate these risks, various defense strategies are examined, including differential privacy, robust cryptographic guarantees, and Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs), offering verifiable and tamper-proof unlearning mechanisms. These approaches are essential for safeguarding data integrity and privacy in high-stakes financial and e-commerce contexts, where compromised models can lead to fraud, data leaks, and reputational damage. This survey highlights the need for continued research and innovation in secure machine unlearning, as well as the importance of developing strong defenses against evolving attack vectors.

Related papers

• New Emerged Security and Privacy of Pre-trained Model: a Survey and Outlook [54.24701201956833]
  Security and privacy issues have undermined users' confidence in pre-trained models. Current literature lacks a clear taxonomy of emerging attacks and defenses for pre-trained models. This taxonomy categorizes attacks and defenses into No-Change, Input-Change, and Model-Change approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T10:15:33Z)
• FEDLAD: Federated Evaluation of Deep Leakage Attacks and Defenses [50.921333548391345]
  Federated Learning is a privacy preserving decentralized machine learning paradigm. Recent research has revealed that private ground truth data can be recovered through a gradient technique known as Deep Leakage. This paper introduces the FEDLAD Framework (Federated Evaluation of Deep Leakage Attacks and Defenses), a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating Deep Leakage attacks and defenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T11:42:26Z)
• Machine Learning-Assisted Intrusion Detection for Enhancing Internet of Things Security [1.2369895513397127]
  Attacks against the Internet of Things (IoT) are rising as devices, applications, and interactions become more networked and integrated. To efficiently secure IoT devices, real-time detection of intrusion systems is critical. This paper investigates the latest research on machine learning-based intrusion detection strategies for IoT security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-01T19:24:34Z)
• Verification of Machine Unlearning is Fragile [48.71651033308842]
  We introduce two novel adversarial unlearning processes capable of circumventing both types of verification strategies. This study highlights the vulnerabilities and limitations in machine unlearning verification, paving the way for further research into the safety of machine unlearning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-01T21:37:10Z)
• Threats, Attacks, and Defenses in Machine Unlearning: A Survey [14.03428437751312]
  Machine Unlearning (MU) has recently gained considerable attention due to its potential to achieve Safe AI. This survey aims to fill the gap between the extensive number of studies on threats, attacks, and defenses in machine unlearning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T15:40:18Z)
• Designing an attack-defense game: how to increase robustness of financial transaction models via a competition [69.08339915577206]
  Given the escalating risks of malicious attacks in the finance sector, understanding adversarial strategies and robust defense mechanisms for machine learning models is critical. We aim to investigate the current state and dynamics of adversarial attacks and defenses for neural network models that use sequential financial data as the input. We have designed a competition that allows realistic and detailed investigation of problems in modern financial transaction data. The participants compete directly against each other, so possible attacks and defenses are examined in close-to-real-life conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-22T12:53:09Z)
• Dataset Security for Machine Learning: Data Poisoning, Backdoor Attacks, and Defenses [150.64470864162556]
  This work systematically categorizes and discusses a wide range of dataset vulnerabilities and exploits. In addition to describing various poisoning and backdoor threat models and the relationships among them, we develop their unified taxonomy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-18T22:38:47Z)
• Confidential Machine Learning on Untrusted Platforms: A Survey [10.45742327204133]
  We will focus on the cryptographic approaches for confidential machine learning (CML) We will also cover other directions such as perturbation-based approaches and CML in the hardware-assisted confidential computing environment. The discussion will take a holistic way to consider a rich context of the related threat models, security assumptions, attacks, design philosophies, and associated trade-offs amongst data utility, cost, and confidentiality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-15T08:57:02Z)
• ML Privacy Meter: Aiding Regulatory Compliance by Quantifying the Privacy Risks of Machine Learning [10.190911271176201]
  Machine learning models pose an additional privacy risk to the data by indirectly revealing about it through the model predictions and parameters. There is an immediate need for a tool that can quantify the privacy risk to data from models. We present ML Privacy Meter, a tool that can quantify the privacy risk to data from models through state of the art membership inference attack techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-18T06:21:35Z)
• Adversarial Machine Learning Attacks and Defense Methods in the Cyber Security Domain [58.30296637276011]
  This paper summarizes the latest research on adversarial attacks against security solutions based on machine learning techniques. It is the first to discuss the unique challenges of implementing end-to-end adversarial attacks in the cyber security domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-05T18:22:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.