Metrics Revolutions: Groundbreaking Insights into the Implementation of Metrics for Biomedical Image Segmentation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.02630v1
• Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 16:14:22 GMT
• Title: Metrics Revolutions: Groundbreaking Insights into the Implementation of Metrics for Biomedical Image Segmentation
• Authors: Gašper Podobnik, Tomaž Vrtovec,
• Abstract summary: We compare 11 open-source tools for distance-based metrics against our highly accurate mesh-based reference implementation. Results revealed statistically significant differences among all open-source tools are both surprising and concerning.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The evaluation of segmentation performance is a common task in biomedical image analysis, with its importance emphasized in the recently released metrics selection guidelines and computing frameworks. To quantitatively evaluate the alignment of two segmentations, researchers commonly resort to counting metrics, such as the Dice similarity coefficient, or distance-based metrics, such as the Hausdorff distance, which are usually computed by publicly available open-source tools with an inherent assumption that these tools provide consistent results. In this study we questioned this assumption, and performed a systematic implementation analysis along with quantitative experiments on real-world clinical data to compare 11 open-source tools for distance-based metrics computation against our highly accurate mesh-based reference implementation. The results revealed that statistically significant differences among all open-source tools are both surprising and concerning, since they question the validity of existing studies. Besides identifying the main sources of variation, we also provide recommendations for distance-based metrics computation.

Related papers

• Evaluating Representational Similarity Measures from the Lens of Functional Correspondence [1.7811840395202345]
  Neuroscience and artificial intelligence (AI) both face the challenge of interpreting high-dimensional neural data. Despite the widespread use of representational comparisons, a critical question remains: which metrics are most suitable for these comparisons?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T23:53:58Z)
• Every Component Counts: Rethinking the Measure of Success for Medical Semantic Segmentation in Multi-Instance Segmentation Tasks [60.80828925396154]
  We present Connected-Component(CC)-Metrics, a novel semantic segmentation evaluation protocol. We motivate this setup in the common medical scenario of semantic segmentation in a full-body PET/CT. We show how existing semantic segmentation metrics suffer from a bias towards larger connected components.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T12:26:05Z)
• Segmentation Quality and Volumetric Accuracy in Medical Imaging [0.9426448361599084]
  Current medical image segmentation relies on the region-based (Dice, F1-score) and boundary-based (Hausdorff distance, surface distance) metrics as the de-facto standard. While these metrics are widely used, they lack a unified interpretation, particularly regarding volume agreement. We utilize relative volume prediction error (vpe) to directly assess the accuracy of volume predictions derived from segmentation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-27T00:49:39Z)
• Rethinking Evaluation Metrics of Open-Vocabulary Segmentaion [78.76867266561537]
  The evaluation process still heavily relies on closed-set metrics without considering the similarity between predicted and ground truth categories. To tackle this issue, we first survey eleven similarity measurements between two categorical words. We designed novel evaluation metrics, namely Open mIoU, Open AP, and Open PQ, tailored for three open-vocabulary segmentation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T18:59:01Z)
• Metrics reloaded: Recommendations for image analysis validation [59.60445111432934]
  Metrics Reloaded is a comprehensive framework guiding researchers in the problem-aware selection of metrics. The framework was developed in a multi-stage Delphi process and is based on the novel concept of a problem fingerprint. Based on the problem fingerprint, users are guided through the process of choosing and applying appropriate validation metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-03T15:56:51Z)
• The Exploitation of Distance Distributions for Clustering [3.42658286826597]
  In cluster analysis, different properties for distance distributions are judged to be relevant for appropriate distance selection. By systematically investigating this specification using distribution analysis through a mirrored-density plot, it is shown that multimodal distance distributions are preferable in cluster analysis. Experiments are performed on several artificial datasets and natural datasets for the task of clustering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-22T06:22:08Z)
• Common Limitations of Image Processing Metrics: A Picture Story [58.83274952067888]
  This document focuses on biomedical image analysis problems that can be phrased as image-level classification, semantic segmentation, instance segmentation, or object detection task. The current version is based on a Delphi process on metrics conducted by an international consortium of image analysis experts from more than 60 institutions worldwide.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-12T17:03:42Z)
• A Statistical Analysis of Summarization Evaluation Metrics using Resampling Methods [60.04142561088524]
  We find that the confidence intervals are rather wide, demonstrating high uncertainty in how reliable automatic metrics truly are. Although many metrics fail to show statistical improvements over ROUGE, two recent works, QAEval and BERTScore, do in some evaluation settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-31T18:28:14Z)
• Estimating informativeness of samples with Smooth Unique Information [108.25192785062367]
  We measure how much a sample informs the final weights and how much it informs the function computed by the weights. We give efficient approximations of these quantities using a linearized network. We apply these measures to several problems, such as dataset summarization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-17T10:29:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.