Characterizing Context Influence and Hallucination in Summarization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.03026v1
• Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 22:19:28 GMT
• Title: Characterizing Context Influence and Hallucination in Summarization
• Authors: James Flemings, Wanrong Zhang, Bo Jiang, Zafar Takhirov, Murali Annavaram,
• Abstract summary: We study the influence and hallucination of contextual information during summarization. We show that context influence gives a lower bound of the private information leakage of CID.
• Score: 10.597854898147313
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Although Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance in numerous downstream tasks, their ubiquity has raised two significant concerns. One is that LLMs can hallucinate by generating content that contradicts relevant contextual information; the other is that LLMs can inadvertently leak private information due to input regurgitation. Many prior works have extensively studied each concern independently, but none have investigated them simultaneously. Furthermore, auditing the influence of provided context during open-ended generation with a privacy emphasis is understudied. To this end, we comprehensively characterize the influence and hallucination of contextual information during summarization. We introduce a definition for context influence and Context-Influence Decoding (CID), and then we show that amplifying the context (by factoring out prior knowledge) and the context being out of distribution with respect to prior knowledge increases the context's influence on an LLM. Moreover, we show that context influence gives a lower bound of the private information leakage of CID. We corroborate our analytical findings with experimental evaluations that show improving the F1 ROGUE-L score on CNN-DM for LLaMA 3 by $\textbf{10}$% over regular decoding also leads to $\textbf{1.5x}$ more influence by the context. Moreover, we empirically evaluate how context influence and hallucination are affected by (1) model capacity, (2) context size, (3) the length of the current response, and (4) different token $n$-grams of the context. Our code can be accessed here: https://github.com/james-flemings/context_influence.

Related papers

• Information-theoretic Estimation of the Risk of Privacy Leaks [0.0]
  dependencies between items in a dataset can lead to privacy leaks.<n>We measure the correlation between the original data and their noisy responses from a randomizer as an indicator of potential privacy breaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-14T03:39:11Z)
• A False Sense of Privacy: Evaluating Textual Data Sanitization Beyond Surface-level Privacy Leakage [77.83757117924995]
  We propose a new framework that evaluates re-identification attacks to quantify individual privacy risks upon data release.<n>Our approach shows that seemingly innocuous auxiliary information can be used to infer sensitive attributes like age or substance use history from sanitized data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-28T01:16:27Z)
• END: Early Noise Dropping for Efficient and Effective Context Denoising [60.24648712022382]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across a wide range of natural language processing tasks. They are often distracted by irrelevant or noisy context in input sequences that degrades output quality. We introduce Early Noise Dropping (textscEND), a novel approach to mitigate this issue without requiring fine-tuning the LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T08:07:17Z)
• Harnessing Large Language Models for Knowledge Graph Question Answering via Adaptive Multi-Aspect Retrieval-Augmentation [81.18701211912779]
  We introduce an Adaptive Multi-Aspect Retrieval-augmented over KGs (Amar) framework. This method retrieves knowledge including entities, relations, and subgraphs, and converts each piece of retrieved text into prompt embeddings. Our method has achieved state-of-the-art performance on two common datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-24T16:38:04Z)
• Knowledge Graphs, Large Language Models, and Hallucinations: An NLP Perspective [5.769786334333616]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized Natural Language Processing (NLP) based applications including automated text generation, question answering, and others. They face a significant challenge: hallucinations, where models produce plausible-sounding but factually incorrect responses. This paper discusses these open challenges covering state-of-the-art datasets and benchmarks as well as methods for knowledge integration and evaluating hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T16:09:05Z)
• When Context Leads but Parametric Memory Follows in Large Language Models [4.567122178196834]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable progress in leveraging diverse knowledge sources. This study investigates how nine widely used LLMs allocate knowledge between local context and global parameters when answering open-ended questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-13T00:03:19Z)
• PrivacyLens: Evaluating Privacy Norm Awareness of Language Models in Action [54.11479432110771]
  PrivacyLens is a novel framework designed to extend privacy-sensitive seeds into expressive vignettes and further into agent trajectories.<n>We instantiate PrivacyLens with a collection of privacy norms grounded in privacy literature and crowdsourced seeds.<n>State-of-the-art LMs, like GPT-4 and Llama-3-70B, leak sensitive information in 25.68% and 38.69% of cases, even when prompted with privacy-enhancing instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-29T17:58:38Z)
• LLM-PBE: Assessing Data Privacy in Large Language Models [111.58198436835036]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have become integral to numerous domains, significantly advancing applications in data management, mining, and analysis. Despite the critical nature of this issue, there has been no existing literature to offer a comprehensive assessment of data privacy risks in LLMs. Our paper introduces LLM-PBE, a toolkit crafted specifically for the systematic evaluation of data privacy risks in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-23T01:37:29Z)
• QUITO: Accelerating Long-Context Reasoning through Query-Guided Context Compression [37.08536175557748]
  In this paper, we introduce a novel Query-gUIded aTtention cOmpression (QUITO) method to filter useless information. Specifically, we take a trigger token to calculate the attention distribution of the context in response to the question. We evaluate the QUITO using two widely-used datasets, namely, NaturalQuestions and ASQA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-01T04:28:38Z)
• LLMs' Reading Comprehension Is Affected by Parametric Knowledge and Struggles with Hypothetical Statements [59.71218039095155]
  Task of reading comprehension (RC) provides a primary means to assess language models' natural language understanding (NLU) capabilities. If the context aligns with the models' internal knowledge, it is hard to discern whether the models' answers stem from context comprehension or from internal information. To address this issue, we suggest to use RC on imaginary data, based on fictitious facts and entities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-09T13:08:56Z)
• Blinded by Generated Contexts: How Language Models Merge Generated and Retrieved Contexts When Knowledge Conflicts? [45.233517779029334]
  We identify whether responses are attributed to generated or retrieved contexts. Experiments reveal a significant bias in several LLMs to favor generated contexts, even when they provide incorrect information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-22T12:54:04Z)
• Knowledge Verification to Nip Hallucination in the Bud [69.79051730580014]
  We demonstrate the feasibility of mitigating hallucinations by verifying and minimizing the inconsistency between external knowledge present in the alignment data and the intrinsic knowledge embedded within foundation LLMs. We propose a novel approach called Knowledge Consistent Alignment (KCA), which employs a well-aligned LLM to automatically formulate assessments based on external knowledge. We demonstrate the superior efficacy of KCA in reducing hallucinations across six benchmarks, utilizing foundation LLMs of varying backbones and scales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-19T15:39:49Z)
• Enhancing Uncertainty-Based Hallucination Detection with Stronger Focus [99.33091772494751]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained significant popularity for their impressive performance across diverse fields. LLMs are prone to hallucinate untruthful or nonsensical outputs that fail to meet user expectations. We propose a novel reference-free, uncertainty-based method for detecting hallucinations in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T08:39:17Z)
• Exploring the Jungle of Bias: Political Bias Attribution in Language Models via Dependency Analysis [86.49858739347412]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have sparked intense debate regarding the prevalence of bias in these models and its mitigation. We propose a prompt-based method for the extraction of confounding and mediating attributes which contribute to the decision process. We find that the observed disparate treatment can at least in part be attributed to confounding and mitigating attributes and model misalignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T00:02:25Z)
• Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theory [82.7042006247124]
  We show that even the most capable AI models reveal private information in contexts that humans would not, 39% and 57% of the time, respectively. Our work underscores the immediate need to explore novel inference-time privacy-preserving approaches, based on reasoning and theory of mind.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T04:15:30Z)
• PrivacyMind: Large Language Models Can Be Contextual Privacy Protection Learners [81.571305826793]
  We introduce Contextual Privacy Protection Language Models (PrivacyMind) Our work offers a theoretical analysis for model design and benchmarks various techniques. In particular, instruction tuning with both positive and negative examples stands out as a promising method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T22:37:01Z)
• Improving Open Information Extraction with Large Language Models: A Study on Demonstration Uncertainty [52.72790059506241]
  Open Information Extraction (OIE) task aims at extracting structured facts from unstructured text. Despite the potential of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT as a general task solver, they lag behind state-of-the-art (supervised) methods in OIE tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-07T01:35:24Z)
• Towards Understanding In-Context Learning with Contrastive Demonstrations and Saliency Maps [7.342347950764399]
  We investigate the role of various demonstration components in the in-context learning performance of large language models (LLMs) Specifically, we explore the impacts of ground-truth labels, input distribution, and complementary explanations, particularly when these are altered or perturbed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-11T07:03:29Z)
• Privacy Implications of Retrieval-Based Language Models [26.87950501433784]
  We present the first study of privacy risks in retrieval-based LMs, particularly $k$NN-LMs. We find that $k$NN-LMs are more susceptible to leaking private information from their private datastore than parametric models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T08:37:27Z)
• Context-faithful Prompting for Large Language Models [51.194410884263135]
  Large language models (LLMs) encode parametric knowledge about world facts. Their reliance on parametric knowledge may cause them to overlook contextual cues, leading to incorrect predictions in context-sensitive NLP tasks. We assess and enhance LLMs' contextual faithfulness in two aspects: knowledge conflict and prediction with abstention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T17:54:58Z)
• CAPE: Context-Aware Private Embeddings for Private Language Learning [0.5156484100374058]
  Context-Aware Private Embeddings (CAPE) is a novel approach which preserves privacy during training of embeddings. CAPE applies calibrated noise through differential privacy, preserving the encoded semantic links while obscuring sensitive information. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach reduces private information leakage better than either single intervention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-27T14:50:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.