On the Optimization and Generalization of Two-layer Transformers with Sign Gradient Descent

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.04870v1
• Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 09:36:43 GMT
• Title: On the Optimization and Generalization of Two-layer Transformers with Sign Gradient Descent
• Authors: Bingrui Li, Wei Huang, Andi Han, Zhanpeng Zhou, Taiji Suzuki, Jun Zhu, Jianfei Chen,
• Abstract summary: Sign Gradient Descent (SignGD) serves as an effective surrogate for Adam. We study how SignGD optimize a two-layer transformer on a noisy dataset. We find that the poor generalization of SignGD is not solely due to data noise, suggesting that both SignGD and Adam requires high-quality data for real-world tasks.
• Score: 51.50999191584981
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The Adam optimizer is widely used for transformer optimization in practice, which makes understanding the underlying optimization mechanisms an important problem. However, due to the Adam's complexity, theoretical analysis of how it optimizes transformers remains a challenging task. Fortunately, Sign Gradient Descent (SignGD) serves as an effective surrogate for Adam. Despite its simplicity, theoretical understanding of how SignGD optimizes transformers still lags behind. In this work, we study how SignGD optimizes a two-layer transformer -- consisting of a softmax attention layer with trainable query-key parameterization followed by a linear layer -- on a linearly separable noisy dataset. We identify four stages in the training dynamics, each exhibiting intriguing behaviors. Based on the training dynamics, we prove the fast convergence but poor generalization of the learned transformer on the noisy dataset. We also show that Adam behaves similarly to SignGD in terms of both optimization and generalization in this setting. Additionally, we find that the poor generalization of SignGD is not solely due to data noise, suggesting that both SignGD and Adam requires high-quality data for real-world tasks. Finally, experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets empirically support our theoretical results.

Related papers

• Unraveling the Gradient Descent Dynamics of Transformers [37.096572564254515]
  Gradient Descent (GD) can train a Transformer model to achieve a global optimal solution, especially when the input embedding dimension is large. We analyze the loss landscape of a single Transformer layer using Softmax and Gaussian attention kernels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T04:33:56Z)
• Unveil Benign Overfitting for Transformer in Vision: Training Dynamics, Convergence, and Generalization [88.5582111768376]
  We study the optimization of a Transformer composed of a self-attention layer with softmax followed by a fully connected layer under gradient descent on a certain data distribution model. Our results establish a sharp condition that can distinguish between the small test error phase and the large test error regime, based on the signal-to-noise ratio in the data model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-28T13:24:11Z)
• Non-asymptotic Convergence of Training Transformers for Next-token Prediction [48.9399496805422]
  Transformers have achieved extraordinary success in modern machine learning due to their excellent ability to handle sequential data. This paper provides a fine-grained non-asymptotic analysis of the training dynamics of a one-layer transformer. We show that the trained transformer presents non-token prediction ability with dataset shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T20:22:06Z)
• Learning on Transformers is Provable Low-Rank and Sparse: A One-layer Analysis [63.66763657191476]
  We show that efficient numerical training and inference algorithms as low-rank computation have impressive performance for learning Transformer-based adaption. We analyze how magnitude-based models affect generalization while improving adaption. We conclude that proper magnitude-based has a slight on the testing performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T23:00:58Z)
• Linear Transformers are Versatile In-Context Learners [19.988368693379087]
  We prove that each layer of a linear transformer maintains a weight vector for an implicit linear regression problem. We also investigate the use of linear transformers in a challenging scenario where the training data is corrupted with different levels of noise. Remarkably, we demonstrate that for this problem linear transformers discover an intricate and highly effective optimization algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T23:45:57Z)
• On the Convergence of Encoder-only Shallow Transformers [62.639819460956176]
  We build the global convergence theory of encoder-only shallow Transformers under a realistic setting. Our results can pave the way for a better understanding of modern Transformers, particularly on training dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-02T20:03:05Z)
• End-to-End Meta-Bayesian Optimisation with Transformer Neural Processes [52.818579746354665]
  This paper proposes the first end-to-end differentiable meta-BO framework that generalises neural processes to learn acquisition functions via transformer architectures. We enable this end-to-end framework with reinforcement learning (RL) to tackle the lack of labelled acquisition data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T10:58:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.