Assumption-Lean Post-Integrated Inference with Surrogate Control Outcomes
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.04996v4
- Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2025 05:10:01 GMT
- Title: Assumption-Lean Post-Integrated Inference with Surrogate Control Outcomes
- Authors: Jin-Hong Du, Kathryn Roeder, Larry Wasserman,
- Abstract summary: We introduce a robust post-integrated inference (PII) method that adjusts for latent heterogeneity using control outcomes.<n>We develop semiparametric inference on projected direct effect estimands, accounting for hidden mediators, confounders, and moderators.<n>The proposed doubly robust estimators are consistent and efficient under minimal assumptions and potential misspecification.
- Score: 6.448728765953916
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Data integration methods aim to extract low-dimensional embeddings from high-dimensional outcomes to remove unwanted variations, such as batch effects and unmeasured covariates, across heterogeneous datasets. However, multiple hypothesis testing after integration can be biased due to data-dependent processes. We introduce a robust post-integrated inference (PII) method that adjusts for latent heterogeneity using control outcomes. Leveraging causal interpretations, we derive nonparametric identifiability of the direct effects using negative control outcomes. By utilizing surrogate control outcomes as an extension of negative control outcomes, we develop semiparametric inference on projected direct effect estimands, accounting for hidden mediators, confounders, and moderators. These estimands remain statistically meaningful under model misspecifications and with error-prone embeddings. We provide bias quantifications and finite-sample linear expansions with uniform concentration bounds. The proposed doubly robust estimators are consistent and efficient under minimal assumptions and potential misspecification, facilitating data-adaptive estimation with machine learning algorithms. Our proposal is evaluated with random forests through simulations and analysis of single-cell CRISPR perturbed datasets with potential unmeasured confounders.
Related papers
- Controllable Generative Sandbox for Causal Inference [9.416664327739516]
CausalMix is a variational generative framework for causal inference.<n>It achieves state-of-the-art distributional metrics on mixed-type tables while providing stable, fine-grained causal control.<n>We demonstrate practical utility in a comparative safety study of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treatments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-03T23:37:05Z) - Departures: Distributional Transport for Single-Cell Perturbation Prediction with Neural Schrödinger Bridges [51.83259180910313]
A major bottleneck in gene function analysis is the unpaired nature of single-cell data.<n>We approximate Schrdinger Bridge (SB) to tackle unpaired single-cell perturbation data.<n>Our model effectively captures heterogeneous single-cell responses and achieves state-of-the-art performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-17T08:27:13Z) - Robust and Differentially Private PCA for non-Gaussian data [3.744589644319257]
We propose a differentially private PCA method applicable to heavy-tailed and potentially contaminated data.<n>By applying a bounded transformation, we enable straightforward computation of principal components in a differentially private manner.<n>Our method consistently outperforms existing approaches in terms of statistical utility.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-21T04:27:09Z) - Unlasting: Unpaired Single-Cell Multi-Perturbation Estimation by Dual Conditional Diffusion Implicit Bridges [68.98973318553983]
We propose a framework based on Dual Diffusion Implicit Bridges (DDIB) to learn the mapping between different data distributions.<n>We integrate gene regulatory network (GRN) information to propagate perturbation signals in a biologically meaningful way.<n>We also incorporate a masking mechanism to predict silent genes, improving the quality of generated profiles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-26T09:05:38Z) - Data Fusion for Partial Identification of Causal Effects [62.56890808004615]
We propose a novel partial identification framework that enables researchers to answer key questions.<n>Is the causal effect positive or negative? and How severe must assumption violations be to overturn this conclusion?<n>We apply our framework to the Project STAR study, which investigates the effect of classroom size on students' third-grade standardized test performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-30T07:13:01Z) - Model-free Methods for Event History Analysis and Efficient Adjustment (PhD Thesis) [55.2480439325792]
This thesis is a series of independent contributions to statistics unified by a model-free perspective.
The first chapter elaborates on how a model-free perspective can be used to formulate flexible methods that leverage prediction techniques from machine learning.
The second chapter studies the concept of local independence, which describes whether the evolution of one process is directly influenced by another.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-11T19:24:09Z) - Double Machine Learning meets Panel Data -- Promises, Pitfalls, and Potential Solutions [0.0]
Estimating causal effect using machine learning (ML) algorithms can help to relax functional form assumptions if used within appropriate frameworks.
We show how we can adapt machine learning (DML) for panel data in the presence of unobserved heterogeneity.
We also show that the influence of the unobserved heterogeneity on the observed confounders plays a significant role for the performance of most alternative methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-02T13:59:54Z) - STATE: A Robust ATE Estimator of Heavy-Tailed Metrics for Variance Reduction in Online Controlled Experiments [22.32661807469984]
We develop a novel framework that integrates the Student's t-distribution with machine learning tools to fit heavy-tailed metrics.
By adopting a variational EM method to optimize the loglikehood function, we can infer a robust solution that greatly eliminates the negative impact of outliers.
Both simulations on synthetic data and long-term empirical results on Meituan experiment platform demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-23T09:35:59Z) - Collaborative Heterogeneous Causal Inference Beyond Meta-analysis [68.4474531911361]
We propose a collaborative inverse propensity score estimator for causal inference with heterogeneous data.
Our method shows significant improvements over the methods based on meta-analysis when heterogeneity increases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-24T09:04:36Z) - Flexible Nonparametric Inference for Causal Effects under the Front-Door Model [2.6900047294457683]
We develop novel one-step and targeted minimum loss-based estimators for both the average treatment effect and the average treatment effect on the treated under front-door assumptions.<n>Our estimators are built on multiple parameterizations of the observed data distribution, including approaches that avoid mediator density entirely.<n>We show how these constraints can be leveraged to improve the efficiency of causal effect estimators.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-15T22:04:53Z) - Selective Nonparametric Regression via Testing [54.20569354303575]
We develop an abstention procedure via testing the hypothesis on the value of the conditional variance at a given point.
Unlike existing methods, the proposed one allows to account not only for the value of the variance itself but also for the uncertainty of the corresponding variance predictor.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-28T13:04:11Z) - Learning to Estimate Without Bias [57.82628598276623]
Gauss theorem states that the weighted least squares estimator is a linear minimum variance unbiased estimation (MVUE) in linear models.
In this paper, we take a first step towards extending this result to non linear settings via deep learning with bias constraints.
A second motivation to BCE is in applications where multiple estimates of the same unknown are averaged for improved performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-24T10:23:51Z) - Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effect by Data Combination [3.655021726150368]
It is important to estimate the local average treatment effect (LATE) when compliance with a treatment assignment is incomplete.
Previously proposed methods for LATE estimation required all relevant variables to be jointly observed in a single dataset.
We propose a weighted least squares estimator that enables simpler model selection by avoiding the minimax objective formulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-11T03:51:48Z) - Efficient Causal Inference from Combined Observational and
Interventional Data through Causal Reductions [68.6505592770171]
Unobserved confounding is one of the main challenges when estimating causal effects.
We propose a novel causal reduction method that replaces an arbitrary number of possibly high-dimensional latent confounders.
We propose a learning algorithm to estimate the parameterized reduced model jointly from observational and interventional data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-08T14:29:07Z) - Robust Bayesian Inference for Discrete Outcomes with the Total Variation
Distance [5.139874302398955]
Models of discrete-valued outcomes are easily misspecified if the data exhibit zero-inflation, overdispersion or contamination.
Here, we introduce a robust discrepancy-based Bayesian approach using the Total Variation Distance (TVD)
We empirically demonstrate that our approach is robust and significantly improves predictive performance on a range of simulated and real world data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-26T09:53:06Z) - Doubly Robust Semiparametric Difference-in-Differences Estimators with
High-Dimensional Data [15.27393561231633]
We propose a doubly robust two-stage semiparametric difference-in-difference estimator for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects.
The first stage allows a general set of machine learning methods to be used to estimate the propensity score.
In the second stage, we derive the rates of convergence for both the parametric parameter and the unknown function.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-07T15:14:29Z) - Machine learning for causal inference: on the use of cross-fit
estimators [77.34726150561087]
Doubly-robust cross-fit estimators have been proposed to yield better statistical properties.
We conducted a simulation study to assess the performance of several estimators for the average causal effect (ACE)
When used with machine learning, the doubly-robust cross-fit estimators substantially outperformed all of the other estimators in terms of bias, variance, and confidence interval coverage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-21T23:09:55Z) - Asymptotic Analysis of an Ensemble of Randomly Projected Linear
Discriminants [94.46276668068327]
In [1], an ensemble of randomly projected linear discriminants is used to classify datasets.
We develop a consistent estimator of the misclassification probability as an alternative to the computationally-costly cross-validation estimator.
We also demonstrate the use of our estimator for tuning the projection dimension on both real and synthetic data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-17T12:47:04Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.