GLOV: Guided Large Language Models as Implicit Optimizers for Vision Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.06154v5
• Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2025 19:00:50 GMT
• Title: GLOV: Guided Large Language Models as Implicit Optimizers for Vision Language Models
• Authors: M. Jehanzeb Mirza, Mengjie Zhao, Zhuoyuan Mao, Sivan Doveh, Wei Lin, Paul Gavrikov, Michael Dorkenwald, Shiqi Yang, Saurav Jha, Hiromi Wakaki, Yuki Mitsufuji, Horst Possegger, Rogerio Feris, Leonid Karlinsky, James Glass,
• Abstract summary: GLOV enables Large Language Models (LLMs) to act as implicit encoders for Vision-Language Models (VLMs) We show that GLOV shows performance improvement by up to 15.0% and 57.5% for dual-encoder (e.g., CLIP) and VL-decoder (e.g., LlaVA) models for object recognition.
• Score: 44.82179903133343
• License:
• Abstract: In this work, we propose GLOV, which enables Large Language Models (LLMs) to act as implicit optimizers for Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to enhance downstream vision tasks. GLOV prompts an LLM with the downstream task description, querying it for suitable VLM prompts (e.g., for zero-shot classification with CLIP). These prompts are ranked according to their fitness for the downstream vision task. In each respective optimization step, the ranked prompts are fed as in-context examples (with their accuracies) to equip the LLM with the knowledge of the type of prompts preferred by the downstream VLM. Furthermore, we explicitly guide the LLM's generation at each optimization step by adding an offset vector -- calculated from the embedding differences between previous positive and negative solutions -- to the intermediate layer of the network for the next generation. This offset vector biases the LLM generation toward the type of language the downstream VLM prefers, resulting in enhanced performance on the downstream vision tasks. We comprehensively evaluate our GLOV on two tasks: object recognition and the critical task of enhancing VLM safety. Our GLOV shows performance improvement by up to 15.0% and 57.5% for dual-encoder (e.g., CLIP) and encoder-decoder (e.g., LlaVA) models for object recognition and reduces the attack success rate (ASR) on state-of-the-art VLMs by up to $60.7\%$.

Related papers

• Preference VLM: Leveraging VLMs for Scalable Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning [17.59802090014789]
  We introduce PrefVLM, a framework that integrates Vision-Language Models (VLMs) with selective human feedback. Our method leverages VLMs to generate initial preference labels, which are then filtered to identify uncertain cases for targeted human annotation. Experiments on Meta-World manipulation tasks demonstrate that PrefVLM achieves comparable or superior success rates to state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T18:50:15Z)
• OLA-VLM: Elevating Visual Perception in Multimodal LLMs with Auxiliary Embedding Distillation [95.78870389271832]
  The standard practice for developing contemporary MLLMs is to feed features from vision encoder(s) into the LLM and train with natural language supervision. We propose OLA-VLM, the first approach distilling knowledge into the LLM's hidden representations from a set of target visual representations. We show that OLA-VLM boosts performance by an average margin of up to 2.5% on various benchmarks, with a notable improvement of 8.7% on the Depth task in CV-Bench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-12T18:55:18Z)
• Rethinking VLMs and LLMs for Image Classification [6.550471260627169]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being merged with Visual Language Models (VLMs) to enable new capabilities. We show that, for object and scene recognition, VLMs that do not leverage LLMs can achieve better performance than VLMs that do. We propose a pragmatic solution: a lightweight fix involving a relatively small LLM that efficiently routes visual tasks to the most suitable model for the task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T23:40:21Z)
• CLIP-DPO: Vision-Language Models as a Source of Preference for Fixing Hallucinations in LVLMs [37.98496239547762]
  Large Vision Language Models are prone to hallucinating details like objects and their properties or relations, limiting their real-world deployment. We present CLIP-DPO, a preference optimization method that leverages contrastively pre-trained Vision-Language (VL) embedding models, such as CLIP, for DPO-based optimization of LVLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T21:56:20Z)
• Mitigating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models via Classifier-Free Guidance [56.04768229686853]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) tend to hallucinate non-existing objects in the images. We introduce a framework called Mitigating hallucinAtion via classifieR-Free guIdaNcE (MARINE) MARINE is both training-free and API-free, and can effectively and efficiently reduce object hallucinations during the generation process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T18:59:05Z)
• CLAMP: Contrastive LAnguage Model Prompt-tuning [89.96914454453791]
  We show that large language models can achieve good image classification performance when adapted this way. Our approach beats state-of-the-art mLLMs by 13% and slightly outperforms contrastive learning with a custom text model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T05:13:59Z)
• Language Models as Black-Box Optimizers for Vision-Language Models [62.80817942316398]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) pre-trained on web-scale datasets have demonstrated remarkable capabilities on downstream tasks when fine-tuned with minimal data. We aim to develop a black-box approach to optimize VLMs through natural language prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-12T04:03:41Z)
• LLMRec: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Recommendation Task [54.48899723591296]
  The application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the recommendation domain has not been thoroughly investigated. We benchmark several popular off-the-shelf LLMs on five recommendation tasks, including rating prediction, sequential recommendation, direct recommendation, explanation generation, and review summarization. The benchmark results indicate that LLMs displayed only moderate proficiency in accuracy-based tasks such as sequential and direct recommendation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T16:32:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.