Don't Cut Corners: Exact Conditions for Modularity in Biologically Inspired Representations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.06232v1
• Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:41:37 GMT
• Title: Don't Cut Corners: Exact Conditions for Modularity in Biologically Inspired Representations
• Authors: Will Dorrell, Kyle Hsu, Luke Hollingsworth, Jin Hwa Lee, Jiajun Wu, Chelsea Finn, Peter E Latham, Tim EJ Behrens, James CR Whittington,
• Abstract summary: We develop a theory of when biologically inspired representations modularise with respect to source variables (sources) We derive necessary and sufficient conditions on a sample of sources that determine whether the neurons in an optimal biologically-inspired linear autoencoder modularise. Our theory applies to any dataset, extending far beyond the case of statistical independence studied in previous work.
• Score: 52.48094670415497
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Why do biological and artificial neurons sometimes modularise, each encoding a single meaningful variable, and sometimes entangle their representation of many variables? In this work, we develop a theory of when biologically inspired representations -- those that are nonnegative and energy efficient -- modularise with respect to source variables (sources). We derive necessary and sufficient conditions on a sample of sources that determine whether the neurons in an optimal biologically-inspired linear autoencoder modularise. Our theory applies to any dataset, extending far beyond the case of statistical independence studied in previous work. Rather, we show that sources modularise if their support is "sufficiently spread". From this theory, we extract and validate predictions in a variety of empirical studies on how data distribution affects modularisation in nonlinear feedforward and recurrent neural networks trained on supervised and unsupervised tasks. Furthermore, we apply these ideas to neuroscience data. First, we explain why two studies that recorded prefrontal activity in working memory tasks conflict on whether memories are encoded in orthogonal subspaces: the support of the sources differed due to a critical discrepancy in experimental protocol. Second, we use similar arguments to understand why preparatory and potent subspaces in RNN models of motor cortex are only sometimes orthogonal. Third, we study spatial and reward information mixing in entorhinal recordings, and show our theory matches data better than previous work. And fourth, we suggest a suite of surprising settings in which neurons can be (or appear) mixed selective, without requiring complex nonlinear readouts as in traditional theories. In sum, our theory prescribes precise conditions on when neural activities modularise, providing tools for inducing and elucidating modular representations in brains and machines.

Related papers

• A generative framework to bridge data-driven models and scientific theories in language neuroscience [84.76462599023802]
  We present generative explanation-mediated validation, a framework for generating concise explanations of language selectivity in the brain. We show that explanatory accuracy is closely related to the predictive power and stability of the underlying statistical models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-01T15:57:48Z)
• Neuroformer: Multimodal and Multitask Generative Pretraining for Brain Data [3.46029409929709]
  State-of-the-art systems neuroscience experiments yield large-scale multimodal data, and these data sets require new tools for analysis. Inspired by the success of large pretrained models in vision and language domains, we reframe the analysis of large-scale, cellular-resolution neuronal spiking data into an autoregressive generation problem. We first trained Neuroformer on simulated datasets, and found that it both accurately predicted intrinsically simulated neuronal circuit activity, and also inferred the underlying neural circuit connectivity, including direction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T20:17:32Z)
• Modular Boundaries in Recurrent Neural Networks [39.626497874552555]
  We use a community detection method from network science known as modularity to partition neurons into distinct modules. These partitions allow us to ask the following question: do these modular boundaries matter to the system?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T16:37:01Z)
• Emergent Modularity in Pre-trained Transformers [127.08792763817496]
  We consider two main characteristics of modularity: functional specialization of neurons and function-based neuron grouping. We study how modularity emerges during pre-training, and find that the modular structure is stabilized at the early stage. It suggests that Transformers first construct the modular structure and then learn fine-grained neuron functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-28T11:02:32Z)
• Modeling Implicit Bias with Fuzzy Cognitive Maps [0.0]
  This paper presents a Fuzzy Cognitive Map model to quantify implicit bias in structured datasets. We introduce a new reasoning mechanism equipped with a normalization-like transfer function that prevents neurons from saturating.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-23T17:04:12Z)
• Logical Information Cells I [10.411800812671952]
  In this study we explore the spontaneous apparition of visible intelligible reasoning in simple artificial networks. We start with the reproduction of a DNN model of natural neurons in monkeys. We then study a bit more complex tasks, a priori involving predicate logic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-10T15:31:26Z)
• The Causal Neural Connection: Expressiveness, Learnability, and Inference [125.57815987218756]
  An object called structural causal model (SCM) represents a collection of mechanisms and sources of random variation of the system under investigation. In this paper, we show that the causal hierarchy theorem (Thm. 1, Bareinboim et al., 2020) still holds for neural models. We introduce a special type of SCM called a neural causal model (NCM), and formalize a new type of inductive bias to encode structural constraints necessary for performing causal inferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-02T01:55:18Z)
• The Neural Coding Framework for Learning Generative Models [91.0357317238509]
  We propose a novel neural generative model inspired by the theory of predictive processing in the brain. In a similar way, artificial neurons in our generative model predict what neighboring neurons will do, and adjust their parameters based on how well the predictions matched reality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-07T01:20:38Z)
• Modeling Shared Responses in Neuroimaging Studies through MultiView ICA [94.31804763196116]
  Group studies involving large cohorts of subjects are important to draw general conclusions about brain functional organization. We propose a novel MultiView Independent Component Analysis model for group studies, where data from each subject are modeled as a linear combination of shared independent sources plus noise. We demonstrate the usefulness of our approach first on fMRI data, where our model demonstrates improved sensitivity in identifying common sources among subjects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-11T17:29:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.