Don't Cut Corners: Exact Conditions for Modularity in Biologically Inspired Representations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.06232v1
• Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:41:37 GMT
• Title: Don't Cut Corners: Exact Conditions for Modularity in Biologically Inspired Representations
• Authors: Will Dorrell, Kyle Hsu, Luke Hollingsworth, Jin Hwa Lee, Jiajun Wu, Chelsea Finn, Peter E Latham, Tim EJ Behrens, James CR Whittington,
• Abstract summary: We develop a theory of when biologically inspired representations modularise with respect to source variables (sources) We derive necessary and sufficient conditions on a sample of sources that determine whether the neurons in an optimal biologically-inspired linear autoencoder modularise. Our theory applies to any dataset, extending far beyond the case of statistical independence studied in previous work.
• Score: 52.48094670415497
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Why do biological and artificial neurons sometimes modularise, each encoding a single meaningful variable, and sometimes entangle their representation of many variables? In this work, we develop a theory of when biologically inspired representations -- those that are nonnegative and energy efficient -- modularise with respect to source variables (sources). We derive necessary and sufficient conditions on a sample of sources that determine whether the neurons in an optimal biologically-inspired linear autoencoder modularise. Our theory applies to any dataset, extending far beyond the case of statistical independence studied in previous work. Rather, we show that sources modularise if their support is "sufficiently spread". From this theory, we extract and validate predictions in a variety of empirical studies on how data distribution affects modularisation in nonlinear feedforward and recurrent neural networks trained on supervised and unsupervised tasks. Furthermore, we apply these ideas to neuroscience data. First, we explain why two studies that recorded prefrontal activity in working memory tasks conflict on whether memories are encoded in orthogonal subspaces: the support of the sources differed due to a critical discrepancy in experimental protocol. Second, we use similar arguments to understand why preparatory and potent subspaces in RNN models of motor cortex are only sometimes orthogonal. Third, we study spatial and reward information mixing in entorhinal recordings, and show our theory matches data better than previous work. And fourth, we suggest a suite of surprising settings in which neurons can be (or appear) mixed selective, without requiring complex nonlinear readouts as in traditional theories. In sum, our theory prescribes precise conditions on when neural activities modularise, providing tools for inducing and elucidating modular representations in brains and machines.

Related papers

• Causal Representation Learning from Multimodal Biological Observations [57.00712157758845]
  We aim to develop flexible identification conditions for multimodal data. We establish identifiability guarantees for each latent component, extending the subspace identification results from prior work. Our key theoretical ingredient is the structural sparsity of the causal connections among distinct modalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-10T16:40:27Z)
• A generative framework to bridge data-driven models and scientific theories in language neuroscience [84.76462599023802]
  We present generative explanation-mediated validation, a framework for generating concise explanations of language selectivity in the brain. We show that explanatory accuracy is closely related to the predictive power and stability of the underlying statistical models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-01T15:57:48Z)
• Modular Boundaries in Recurrent Neural Networks [39.626497874552555]
  We use a community detection method from network science known as modularity to partition neurons into distinct modules. These partitions allow us to ask the following question: do these modular boundaries matter to the system?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T16:37:01Z)
• Inferring Inference [7.11780383076327]
  We develop a framework for inferring canonical distributed computations from large-scale neural activity patterns. We simulate recordings for a model brain that implicitly implements an approximate inference algorithm on a probabilistic graphical model. Overall, this framework provides a new tool for discovering interpretable structure in neural recordings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T22:12:11Z)
• On the Generalization and Adaption Performance of Causal Models [99.64022680811281]
  Differentiable causal discovery has proposed to factorize the data generating process into a set of modules. We study the generalization and adaption performance of such modular neural causal models. Our analysis shows that the modular neural causal models outperform other models on both zero and few-shot adaptation in low data regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-09T17:12:32Z)
• Modeling Implicit Bias with Fuzzy Cognitive Maps [0.0]
  This paper presents a Fuzzy Cognitive Map model to quantify implicit bias in structured datasets. We introduce a new reasoning mechanism equipped with a normalization-like transfer function that prevents neurons from saturating.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-23T17:04:12Z)
• The Causal Neural Connection: Expressiveness, Learnability, and Inference [125.57815987218756]
  An object called structural causal model (SCM) represents a collection of mechanisms and sources of random variation of the system under investigation. In this paper, we show that the causal hierarchy theorem (Thm. 1, Bareinboim et al., 2020) still holds for neural models. We introduce a special type of SCM called a neural causal model (NCM), and formalize a new type of inductive bias to encode structural constraints necessary for performing causal inferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-02T01:55:18Z)
• The Neural Coding Framework for Learning Generative Models [91.0357317238509]
  We propose a novel neural generative model inspired by the theory of predictive processing in the brain. In a similar way, artificial neurons in our generative model predict what neighboring neurons will do, and adjust their parameters based on how well the predictions matched reality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-07T01:20:38Z)
• Learning identifiable and interpretable latent models of high-dimensional neural activity using pi-VAE [10.529943544385585]
  We propose a method that integrates key ingredients from latent models and traditional neural encoding models. Our method, pi-VAE, is inspired by recent progress on identifiable variational auto-encoder. We validate pi-VAE using synthetic data, and apply it to analyze neurophysiological datasets from rat hippocampus and macaque motor cortex.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-09T22:00:38Z)
• TaBooN -- Boolean Network Synthesis Based on Tabu Search [0.0]
  Omics-technologies revolutionized the investigation of biology by producing molecular data in multiple dimensions and scale. Biological network is composed of nodes referring to the components such as genes or proteins, and the edges/arcs formalizing interactions between them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-08T08:56:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.