Root Defence Strategies: Ensuring Safety of LLM at the Decoding Level

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.06809v1
• Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 12:09:30 GMT
• Title: Root Defence Strategies: Ensuring Safety of LLM at the Decoding Level
• Authors: Xinyi Zeng, Yuying Shang, Yutao Zhu, Jiawei Chen, Yu Tian,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated immense utility across various industries. As LLMs advance, the risk of harmful outputs increases due to incorrect or malicious instruction prompts. This paper examines the LLMs' capability to recognize harmful outputs, revealing and quantifying their proficiency in assessing the danger of previous tokens.
• Score: 10.658844160259104
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated immense utility across various industries. However, as LLMs advance, the risk of harmful outputs increases due to incorrect or malicious instruction prompts. While current methods effectively address jailbreak risks, they share common limitations: 1) Judging harmful responses from the prefill-level lacks utilization of the model's decoding outputs, leading to relatively lower effectiveness and robustness. 2) Rejecting potentially harmful responses based on a single evaluation can significantly impair the model's helpfulness.This paper examines the LLMs' capability to recognize harmful outputs, revealing and quantifying their proficiency in assessing the danger of previous tokens. Motivated by pilot experiment results, we design a robust defense mechanism at the decoding level. Our novel decoder-oriented, step-by-step defense architecture corrects harmful queries directly rather than rejecting them outright. We introduce speculative decoding to enhance usability and facilitate deployment to boost secure decoding speed. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach improves model security without compromising reasoning speed. Notably, our method leverages the model's ability to discern hazardous information, maintaining its helpfulness compared to existing methods.

Related papers

• HarmLevelBench: Evaluating Harm-Level Compliance and the Impact of Quantization on Model Alignment [1.8843687952462742]
  This paper aims to address gaps in the current literature on jailbreaking techniques and the evaluation of LLM vulnerabilities. Our contributions include the creation of a novel dataset designed to assess the harmfulness of model outputs across multiple harm levels. We provide a comprehensive benchmark of state-of-the-art jailbreaking attacks, specifically targeting the Vicuna 13B v1.5 model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T10:02:49Z)
• Jailbreak Antidote: Runtime Safety-Utility Balance via Sparse Representation Adjustment in Large Language Models [8.024771725860127]
  Jailbreak attacks manipulate large language models into generating harmful content. Jailbreak Antidote enables real-time adjustment of safety preferences by manipulating a sparse subset of the model's internal states. Our analysis reveals that safety-related information in LLMs is sparsely distributed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T08:34:17Z)
• Refuse Whenever You Feel Unsafe: Improving Safety in LLMs via Decoupled Refusal Training [67.30423823744506]
  This study addresses a critical gap in safety tuning practices for Large Language Models (LLMs) We introduce a novel approach, Decoupled Refusal Training (DeRTa), designed to empower LLMs to refuse compliance to harmful prompts at any response position. DeRTa incorporates two novel components: (1) Maximum Likelihood Estimation with Harmful Response Prefix, which trains models to recognize and avoid unsafe content by appending a segment of harmful response to the beginning of a safe response, and (2) Reinforced Transition Optimization (RTO), which equips models with the ability to transition from potential harm to safety refusal consistently throughout the harmful
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T09:36:33Z)
• SafeAligner: Safety Alignment against Jailbreak Attacks via Response Disparity Guidance [48.80398992974831]
  SafeAligner is a methodology implemented at the decoding stage to fortify defenses against jailbreak attacks. We develop two specialized models: the Sentinel Model, which is trained to foster safety, and the Intruder Model, designed to generate riskier responses. We show that SafeAligner can increase the likelihood of beneficial tokens, while reducing the occurrence of harmful ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-26T07:15:44Z)
• Jailbreaking as a Reward Misspecification Problem [80.52431374743998]
  We propose a novel perspective that attributes this vulnerability to reward misspecification during the alignment process. We introduce a metric ReGap to quantify the extent of reward misspecification and demonstrate its effectiveness. We present ReMiss, a system for automated red teaming that generates adversarial prompts in a reward-misspecified space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T15:12:27Z)
• Fine-Tuning, Quantization, and LLMs: Navigating Unintended Outcomes [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained widespread adoption across various domains, including chatbots and auto-task completion agents. These models are susceptible to safety vulnerabilities such as jailbreaking, prompt injection, and privacy leakage attacks. This study investigates the impact of these modifications on LLM safety, a critical consideration for building reliable and secure AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-05T20:31:45Z)
• ROSE Doesn't Do That: Boosting the Safety of Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models with Reverse Prompt Contrastive Decoding [89.0074567748505]
  We present reverse prompt contrastive decoding (ROSE), a simple-yet-effective method to boost the safety of existing instruction-tuned LLMs without any additional training. Experiments on 6 safety and 2 general-purpose tasks show that, our ROSE not only brings consistent and significant safety improvements (up to +13.8% safety score) upon 5 types of instruction-tuned LLMs, but also benefits the general-purpose ability of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T06:58:42Z)
• On Prompt-Driven Safeguarding for Large Language Models [172.13943777203377]
  We find that in the representation space, the input queries are typically moved by safety prompts in a "higher-refusal" direction. Inspired by these findings, we propose a method for safety prompt optimization, namely DRO. Treating a safety prompt as continuous, trainable embeddings, DRO learns to move the queries' representations along or opposite the refusal direction, depending on their harmfulness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-31T17:28:24Z)
• Gaining Wisdom from Setbacks: Aligning Large Language Models via Mistake Analysis [127.85293480405082]
  The rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has not only provided numerous opportunities but also presented significant challenges. Existing alignment methods usually direct LLMs toward the favorable outcomes by utilizing human-annotated, flawless instruction-response pairs. This study proposes a novel alignment technique based on mistake analysis, which deliberately exposes LLMs to erroneous content to learn the reasons for mistakes and how to avoid them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T14:59:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.