No Free Lunch: Retrieval-Augmented Generation Undermines Fairness in LLMs, Even for Vigilant Users

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.07589v1
• Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 03:51:58 GMT
• Title: No Free Lunch: Retrieval-Augmented Generation Undermines Fairness in LLMs, Even for Vigilant Users
• Authors: Mengxuan Hu, Hongyi Wu, Zihan Guan, Ronghang Zhu, Dongliang Guo, Daiqing Qi, Sheng Li,
• Abstract summary: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is widely adopted for its effectiveness and cost-efficiency. This study proposes a practical three-level threat model from the perspective of user awareness of fairness. We examine the fairness implications of RAG using uncensored, partially censored, and fully censored datasets.
• Score: 21.25007065608671
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is widely adopted for its effectiveness and cost-efficiency in mitigating hallucinations and enhancing the domain-specific generation capabilities of large language models (LLMs). However, is this effectiveness and cost-efficiency truly a free lunch? In this study, we comprehensively investigate the fairness costs associated with RAG by proposing a practical three-level threat model from the perspective of user awareness of fairness. Specifically, varying levels of user fairness awareness result in different degrees of fairness censorship on the external dataset. We examine the fairness implications of RAG using uncensored, partially censored, and fully censored datasets. Our experiments demonstrate that fairness alignment can be easily undermined through RAG without the need for fine-tuning or retraining. Even with fully censored and supposedly unbiased external datasets, RAG can lead to biased outputs. Our findings underscore the limitations of current alignment methods in the context of RAG-based LLMs and highlight the urgent need for new strategies to ensure fairness. We propose potential mitigations and call for further research to develop robust fairness safeguards in RAG-based LLMs.

Related papers

• Provenance: A Light-weight Fact-checker for Retrieval Augmented LLM Generation Output [49.893971654861424]
  We present a light-weight approach for detecting nonfactual outputs from retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) We compute a factuality score that can be thresholded to yield a binary decision. Our experiments show high area under the ROC curve (AUC) across a wide range of relevant open source datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T20:44:59Z)
• Does RAG Introduce Unfairness in LLMs? Evaluating Fairness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems [18.926129063000264]
  RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) have recently gained significant attention for their enhanced ability to integrate external knowledge sources. We propose a fairness evaluation framework tailored to RAG methods, using scenario-based questions and analyzing disparities across demographic attributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-29T22:04:26Z)
• SFR-RAG: Towards Contextually Faithful LLMs [57.666165819196486]
  Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) is a paradigm that integrates external contextual information with large language models (LLMs) to enhance factual accuracy and relevance. We introduce SFR-RAG, a small LLM that is instruction-textual with an emphasis on context-grounded generation and hallucination. We also present ConBench, a new evaluation framework compiling multiple popular and diverse RAG benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T01:08:18Z)
• RAGEval: Scenario Specific RAG Evaluation Dataset Generation Framework [69.4501863547618]
  This paper introduces RAGEval, a framework designed to assess RAG systems across diverse scenarios. With a focus on factual accuracy, we propose three novel metrics Completeness, Hallucination, and Irrelevance. Experimental results show that RAGEval outperforms zero-shot and one-shot methods in terms of clarity, safety, conformity, and richness of generated samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T13:35:11Z)
• Thinking Racial Bias in Fair Forgery Detection: Models, Datasets and Evaluations [63.52709761339949]
  We first contribute a dedicated dataset called the Fair Forgery Detection (FairFD) dataset, where we prove the racial bias of public state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods. We design novel metrics including Approach Averaged Metric and Utility Regularized Metric, which can avoid deceptive results. We also present an effective and robust post-processing technique, Bias Pruning with Fair Activations (BPFA), which improves fairness without requiring retraining or weight updates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T14:53:18Z)
• A Theory for Token-Level Harmonization in Retrieval-Augmented Generation [76.75124161306795]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) utilizes retrieved texts to enhance large language models (LLMs) This paper provides a theory to explain and trade off the benefit and detriment in RAG. Based on our theory, we propose a practical novel method, Tok-RAG, which achieves collaborative generation between the pure LLM and RAG.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T02:56:14Z)
• Fairness-aware Federated Minimax Optimization with Convergence Guarantee [10.727328530242461]
  Federated learning (FL) has garnered considerable attention due to its privacy-preserving feature. The lack of freedom in managing user data can lead to group fairness issues, where models are biased towards sensitive factors such as race or gender. This paper proposes a novel algorithm, fair federated averaging with augmented Lagrangian method (FFALM), designed explicitly to address group fairness issues in FL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-10T08:45:58Z)
• Fair-CDA: Continuous and Directional Augmentation for Group Fairness [48.84385689186208]
  We propose a fine-grained data augmentation strategy for imposing fairness constraints. We show that group fairness can be achieved by regularizing the models on transition paths of sensitive features between groups. Our proposed method does not assume any data generative model and ensures good generalization for both accuracy and fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-01T11:23:00Z)
• Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learning [20.803276801890657]
  We train an ML model to improve fairness when we do not even know the protected group memberships. In particular, we hypothesize that non-protected features and task labels are valuable for identifying fairness issues. Our results show that ARL improves Rawlsian Max-Min fairness, with notable AUC improvements for worst-case protected groups in multiple datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-23T16:06:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.