Decision-Aware Predictive Model Selection for Workforce Allocation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.07932v1
• Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 13:59:43 GMT
• Title: Decision-Aware Predictive Model Selection for Workforce Allocation
• Authors: Eric G. Stratman, Justin J. Boutilier, Laura A. Albert,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a novel framework that utilizes machine learning to predict worker behavior. In our approach, the optimal predictive model used to represent a worker's behavior is determined by how that worker is allocated. We present a decision-aware optimization framework that integrates predictive model selection with worker allocation.
• Score: 0.27309692684728615
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Many organizations depend on human decision-makers to make subjective decisions, especially in settings where information is scarce. Although workers are often viewed as interchangeable, the specific individual assigned to a task can significantly impact outcomes due to their unique decision-making processes and risk tolerance. In this paper, we introduce a novel framework that utilizes machine learning to predict worker behavior and employs integer optimization to strategically assign workers to tasks. Unlike traditional methods that treat machine learning predictions as static inputs for optimization, in our approach, the optimal predictive model used to represent a worker's behavior is determined by how that worker is allocated within the optimization process. We present a decision-aware optimization framework that integrates predictive model selection with worker allocation. Collaborating with an auto-insurance provider and using real-world data, we evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed method by applying three different techniques to predict worker behavior. Our findings show the proposed decision-aware framework outperforms traditional methods and offers context-sensitive and data-responsive strategies for workforce management.

Related papers

• Learning Joint Models of Prediction and Optimization [56.04498536842065]
  Predict-Then-Then framework uses machine learning models to predict unknown parameters of an optimization problem from features before solving. This paper proposes an alternative method, in which optimal solutions are learned directly from the observable features by joint predictive models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-07T19:52:14Z)
• Pattern based learning and optimisation through pricing for bin packing problem [50.83768979636913]
  We argue that when problem conditions such as the distributions of random variables change, the patterns that performed well in previous circumstances may become less effective. We propose a novel scheme to efficiently identify patterns and dynamically quantify their values for each specific condition. Our method quantifies the value of patterns based on their ability to satisfy constraints and their effects on the objective value.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-27T17:03:48Z)
• Data-Driven Goal Recognition Design for General Behavioral Agents [14.750023724230774]
  We introduce a data-driven approach to goal recognition design that can account for agents with general behavioral models. We propose a gradient-based optimization framework that accommodates various constraints to optimize decision-making environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-03T20:38:22Z)
• Predict-Then-Optimize by Proxy: Learning Joint Models of Prediction and Optimization [59.386153202037086]
  Predict-Then- framework uses machine learning models to predict unknown parameters of an optimization problem from features before solving. This approach can be inefficient and requires handcrafted, problem-specific rules for backpropagation through the optimization step. This paper proposes an alternative method, in which optimal solutions are learned directly from the observable features by predictive models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T01:32:06Z)
• Assisting Human Decisions in Document Matching [52.79491990823573]
  We devise a proxy matching task that allows us to evaluate which kinds of assistive information improve decision makers' performance. We find that providing black-box model explanations reduces users' accuracy on the matching task. On the other hand, custom methods that are designed to closely attend to some task-specific desiderata are found to be effective in improving user performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-16T17:45:20Z)
• Efficient Real-world Testing of Causal Decision Making via Bayesian Experimental Design for Contextual Optimisation [12.37745209793872]
  We introduce a model-agnostic framework for gathering data to evaluate and improve contextual decision making. Our method is used for the data-efficient evaluation of the regret of past treatment assignments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-12T01:20:11Z)
• Meta-Wrapper: Differentiable Wrapping Operator for User Interest Selection in CTR Prediction [97.99938802797377]
  Click-through rate (CTR) prediction, whose goal is to predict the probability of the user to click on an item, has become increasingly significant in recommender systems. Recent deep learning models with the ability to automatically extract the user interest from his/her behaviors have achieved great success. We propose a novel approach under the framework of the wrapper method, which is named Meta-Wrapper.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-28T03:28:15Z)
• Explainability's Gain is Optimality's Loss? -- How Explanations Bias Decision-making [0.0]
  Explanations help to facilitate communication between the algorithm and the human decision-maker. Feature-based explanations' semantics of causal models induce leakage from the decision-maker's prior beliefs. Such differences can lead to sub-optimal and biased decision outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-17T11:43:42Z)
• Leveraging Expert Consistency to Improve Algorithmic Decision Support [62.61153549123407]
  We explore the use of historical expert decisions as a rich source of information that can be combined with observed outcomes to narrow the construct gap. We propose an influence function-based methodology to estimate expert consistency indirectly when each case in the data is assessed by a single expert. Our empirical evaluation, using simulations in a clinical setting and real-world data from the child welfare domain, indicates that the proposed approach successfully narrows the construct gap.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-24T05:40:29Z)
• Integrated Optimization of Predictive and Prescriptive Tasks [0.0]
  We propose a new framework directly integrating predictive tasks under prescriptive tasks. We train the parameters of predictive algorithm within a prescription problem via bilevel optimization techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-02T02:43:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.