The Dynamics of Social Conventions in LLM populations: Spontaneous Emergence, Collective Biases and Tipping Points

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.08948v1
• Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 16:16:38 GMT
• Title: The Dynamics of Social Conventions in LLM populations: Spontaneous Emergence, Collective Biases and Tipping Points
• Authors: Ariel Flint Ashery, Luca Maria Aiello, Andrea Baronchelli,
• Abstract summary: We investigate the dynamics of conventions within populations of Large Language Model (LLM) agents using simulated interactions. We show that globally accepted social conventions can spontaneously arise from local interactions between communicating LLMs. Minority groups of committed LLMs can drive social change by establishing new social conventions.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Social conventions are the foundation for social and economic life. As legions of AI agents increasingly interact with each other and with humans, their ability to form shared conventions will determine how effectively they will coordinate behaviors, integrate into society and influence it. Here, we investigate the dynamics of conventions within populations of Large Language Model (LLM) agents using simulated interactions. First, we show that globally accepted social conventions can spontaneously arise from local interactions between communicating LLMs. Second, we demonstrate how strong collective biases can emerge during this process, even when individual agents appear to be unbiased. Third, we examine how minority groups of committed LLMs can drive social change by establishing new social conventions. We show that once these minority groups reach a critical size, they can consistently overturn established behaviors. In all cases, contrasting the experimental results with predictions from a minimal multi-agent model allows us to isolate the specific role of LLM agents. Our results clarify how AI systems can autonomously develop norms without explicit programming and have implications for designing AI systems that align with human values and societal goals.

Related papers

• Static network structure cannot stabilize cooperation among Large Language Model agents [6.868298200380496]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to model human social behavior. This study aims to identify parallels in cooperative behavior between LLMs and humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T15:52:15Z)
• Persuasion with Large Language Models: a Survey [49.86930318312291]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have created new disruptive possibilities for persuasive communication. In areas such as politics, marketing, public health, e-commerce, and charitable giving, such LLM Systems have already achieved human-level or even super-human persuasiveness. Our survey suggests that the current and future potential of LLM-based persuasion poses profound ethical and societal risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T10:05:52Z)
• Spontaneous Emergence of Agent Individuality through Social Interactions in LLM-Based Communities [0.0]
  We study the emergence of agency from scratch by using Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents. By analyzing this multi-agent simulation, we report valuable new insights into how social norms, cooperation, and personality traits can emerge spontaneously.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T16:49:33Z)
• I Want to Break Free! Persuasion and Anti-Social Behavior of LLMs in Multi-Agent Settings with Social Hierarchy [13.68625980741047]
  We study interaction patterns of Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents in a context characterized by strict social hierarchy. We study two types of phenomena: persuasion and anti-social behavior in simulated scenarios involving a guard and a prisoner agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T17:45:47Z)
• Artificial Leviathan: Exploring Social Evolution of LLM Agents Through the Lens of Hobbesian Social Contract Theory [8.80864059602965]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) and advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) offer an opportunity for computational social science research at scale. Our work introduces a simulated agent society where complex social relationships dynamically form and evolve over time. We analyze whether, as the theory postulates, agents seek to escape a brutish "state of nature" by surrendering rights to an absolute sovereign in exchange for order and security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T14:42:58Z)
• SocialGFs: Learning Social Gradient Fields for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [58.84311336011451]
  We propose a novel gradient-based state representation for multi-agent reinforcement learning. We employ denoising score matching to learn the social gradient fields (SocialGFs) from offline samples. In practice, we integrate SocialGFs into the widely used multi-agent reinforcement learning algorithms, e.g., MAPPO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T04:12:19Z)
• Do LLM Agents Exhibit Social Behavior? [5.094340963261968]
  State-Understanding-Value-Action (SUVA) is a framework to systematically analyze responses in social contexts. It assesses social behavior through both their final decisions and the response generation processes leading to those decisions. We demonstrate that utterance-based reasoning reliably predicts LLMs' final actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-23T08:46:53Z)
• SOTOPIA: Interactive Evaluation for Social Intelligence in Language Agents [107.4138224020773]
  We present SOTOPIA, an open-ended environment to simulate complex social interactions between artificial agents and humans. In our environment, agents role-play and interact under a wide variety of scenarios; they coordinate, collaborate, exchange, and compete with each other to achieve complex social goals. We find that GPT-4 achieves a significantly lower goal completion rate than humans and struggles to exhibit social commonsense reasoning and strategic communication skills.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-18T02:27:01Z)
• Exploring Collaboration Mechanisms for LLM Agents: A Social Psychology View [60.80731090755224]
  This paper probes the collaboration mechanisms among contemporary NLP systems by practical experiments with theoretical insights. We fabricate four unique societies' comprised of LLM agents, where each agent is characterized by a specific trait' (easy-going or overconfident) and engages in collaboration with a distinct thinking pattern' (debate or reflection) Our results further illustrate that LLM agents manifest human-like social behaviors, such as conformity and consensus reaching, mirroring social psychology theories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T15:05:52Z)
• Training Socially Aligned Language Models on Simulated Social Interactions [99.39979111807388]
  Social alignment in AI systems aims to ensure that these models behave according to established societal values. Current language models (LMs) are trained to rigidly replicate their training corpus in isolation. This work presents a novel training paradigm that permits LMs to learn from simulated social interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T14:17:36Z)
• This Must Be the Place: Predicting Engagement of Online Communities in a Large-scale Distributed Campaign [70.69387048368849]
  We study the behavior of communities with millions of active members. We develop a hybrid model, combining textual cues, community meta-data, and structural properties. We demonstrate the applicability of our model through Reddit's r/place a large-scale online experiment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-14T08:23:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.