Use of What-if Scenarios to Help Explain Artificial Intelligence Models for Neonatal Health

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.09635v1
• Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 20:21:00 GMT
• Title: Use of What-if Scenarios to Help Explain Artificial Intelligence Models for Neonatal Health
• Authors: Abdullah Mamun, Lawrence D. Devoe, Mark I. Evans, David W. Britt, Judith Klein-Seetharaman, Hassan Ghasemzadeh,
• Abstract summary: Early detection of intrapartum risk enables interventions to potentially prevent or mitigate adverse labor outcomes such as cerebral palsy. We propose "Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Modeling and Explaining Neonatal Health" (AIMEN) A deep learning framework that not only predicts adverse labor outcomes from maternal, fetal, obstetrical, and intrapartum risk factors but also provides the model's reasoning behind the predictions made.
• Score: 6.102406188211489
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Early detection of intrapartum risk enables interventions to potentially prevent or mitigate adverse labor outcomes such as cerebral palsy. Currently, there is no accurate automated system to predict such events to assist with clinical decision-making. To fill this gap, we propose "Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Modeling and Explaining Neonatal Health" (AIMEN), a deep learning framework that not only predicts adverse labor outcomes from maternal, fetal, obstetrical, and intrapartum risk factors but also provides the model's reasoning behind the predictions made. The latter can provide insights into what modifications in the input variables of the model could have changed the predicted outcome. We address the challenges of imbalance and small datasets by synthesizing additional training data using Adaptive Synthetic Sampling (ADASYN) and Conditional Tabular Generative Adversarial Networks (CTGAN). AIMEN uses an ensemble of fully-connected neural networks as the backbone for its classification with the data augmentation supported by either ADASYN or CTGAN. AIMEN, supported by CTGAN, outperforms AIMEN supported by ADASYN in classification. AIMEN can predict a high risk for adverse labor outcomes with an average F1 score of 0.784. It also provides counterfactual explanations that can be achieved by changing 2 to 3 attributes on average. Resources available: https://github.com/ab9mamun/AIMEN.

Related papers

• Physical formula enhanced multi-task learning for pharmacokinetics prediction [54.13787789006417]
  A major challenge for AI-driven drug discovery is the scarcity of high-quality data. We develop a formula enhanced mul-ti-task learning (PEMAL) method that predicts four key parameters of pharmacokinetics simultaneously. Our experiments reveal that PEMAL significantly lowers the data demand, compared to typical Graph Neural Networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T07:42:55Z)
• Towards a Transportable Causal Network Model Based on Observational Healthcare Data [1.333879175460266]
  We propose a novel approach that combines selection diagrams, missingness graphs, causal discovery and prior knowledge into a single graphical model. We learn this model from data comprising two different cohorts of patients. The resulting causal network model is validated by expert clinicians in terms of risk assessment, accuracy and explainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T13:23:31Z)
• MedDiffusion: Boosting Health Risk Prediction via Diffusion-based Data Augmentation [58.93221876843639]
  This paper introduces a novel, end-to-end diffusion-based risk prediction model, named MedDiffusion. It enhances risk prediction performance by creating synthetic patient data during training to enlarge sample space. It discerns hidden relationships between patient visits using a step-wise attention mechanism, enabling the model to automatically retain the most vital information for generating high-quality data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T01:36:30Z)
• Explainable AI for Malnutrition Risk Prediction from m-Health and Clinical Data [3.093890460224435]
  This paper presents a novel AI framework for early and explainable malnutrition risk detection based on heterogeneous m-health data. We performed an extensive model evaluation including both subject-independent and personalised predictions. We also investigated several benchmark XAI methods to extract global model explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T08:07:35Z)
• An Improved Model Ensembled of Different Hyper-parameter Tuned Machine Learning Algorithms for Fetal Health Prediction [1.332560004325655]
  We propose a robust ensemble model called ensemble of tuned Support Vector Machine and ExtraTrees for predicting fetal health. Our proposed ETSE model outperformed the other models with 100% precision, 100% recall, 100% F1-score, and 99.66% accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T16:40:44Z)
• NeuroExplainer: Fine-Grained Attention Decoding to Uncover Cortical Development Patterns of Preterm Infants [73.85768093666582]
  We propose an explainable geometric deep network dubbed NeuroExplainer. NeuroExplainer is used to uncover altered infant cortical development patterns associated with preterm birth.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-01T12:48:12Z)
• EINNs: Epidemiologically-Informed Neural Networks [75.34199997857341]
  We introduce a new class of physics-informed neural networks-EINN-crafted for epidemic forecasting. We investigate how to leverage both the theoretical flexibility provided by mechanistic models as well as the data-driven expressability afforded by AI models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-21T18:59:03Z)
• Algorithmic encoding of protected characteristics and its implications on disparities across subgroups [17.415882865534638]
  Machine learning models may pick up undesirable correlations between a patient's racial identity and clinical outcome. Very little is known about how these biases are encoded and how one may reduce or even remove disparate performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-27T20:30:57Z)
• Improvement of a Prediction Model for Heart Failure Survival through Explainable Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
  This work presents an explainability analysis and evaluation of a prediction model for heart failure survival. The model employs a data workflow pipeline able to select the best ensemble tree algorithm as well as the best feature selection technique. The paper's main contribution is an explainability-driven approach to select the best prediction model for HF survival based on an accuracy-explainability balance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-20T09:03:26Z)
• Bootstrapping Your Own Positive Sample: Contrastive Learning With Electronic Health Record Data [62.29031007761901]
  This paper proposes a novel contrastive regularized clinical classification model. We introduce two unique positive sampling strategies specifically tailored for EHR data. Our framework yields highly competitive experimental results in predicting the mortality risk on real-world COVID-19 EHR data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T06:02:04Z)
• UNITE: Uncertainty-based Health Risk Prediction Leveraging Multi-sourced Data [81.00385374948125]
  We present UNcertaInTy-based hEalth risk prediction (UNITE) model. UNITE provides accurate disease risk prediction and uncertainty estimation leveraging multi-sourced health data. We evaluate UNITE on real-world disease risk prediction tasks: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NASH) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) UNITE achieves up to 0.841 in F1 score for AD detection, up to 0.609 in PR-AUC for NASH detection, and outperforms various state-of-the-art baselines by up to $19%$ over the best baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T02:28:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.