MentalGLM Series: Explainable Large Language Models for Mental Health Analysis on Chinese Social Media
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10323v1
- Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 09:29:27 GMT
- Title: MentalGLM Series: Explainable Large Language Models for Mental Health Analysis on Chinese Social Media
- Authors: Wei Zhai, Nan Bai, Qing Zhao, Jianqiang Li, Fan Wang, Hongzhi Qi, Meng Jiang, Xiaoqin Wang, Bing Xiang Yang, Guanghui Fu,
- Abstract summary: Black box models are inflexible when switching between tasks, and their results typically lack explanations.
With the rise of large language models (LLMs), their flexibility has introduced new approaches to the field.
In this paper, we introduce the first multi-task Chinese Social Media Interpretable Mental Health Instructions dataset, consisting of 9K samples.
We also propose MentalGLM series models, the first open-source LLMs designed for explainable mental health analysis targeting Chinese social media.
- Score: 31.752563319585196
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: As the prevalence of mental health challenges, social media has emerged as a key platform for individuals to express their emotions.Deep learning tends to be a promising solution for analyzing mental health on social media. However, black box models are often inflexible when switching between tasks, and their results typically lack explanations. With the rise of large language models (LLMs), their flexibility has introduced new approaches to the field. Also due to the generative nature, they can be prompted to explain decision-making processes. However, their performance on complex psychological analysis still lags behind deep learning. In this paper, we introduce the first multi-task Chinese Social Media Interpretable Mental Health Instructions (C-IMHI) dataset, consisting of 9K samples, which has been quality-controlled and manually validated. We also propose MentalGLM series models, the first open-source LLMs designed for explainable mental health analysis targeting Chinese social media, trained on a corpus of 50K instructions. The proposed models were evaluated on three downstream tasks and achieved better or comparable performance compared to deep learning models, generalized LLMs, and task fine-tuned LLMs. We validated a portion of the generated decision explanations with experts, showing promising results. We also evaluated the proposed models on a clinical dataset, where they outperformed other LLMs, indicating their potential applicability in the clinical field. Our models show strong performance, validated across tasks and perspectives. The decision explanations enhance usability and facilitate better understanding and practical application of the models. Both the constructed dataset and the models are publicly available via: https://github.com/zwzzzQAQ/MentalGLM.
Related papers
- Neuron-based Personality Trait Induction in Large Language Models [115.08894603023712]
Large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly proficient at simulating various personality traits.
We present a neuron-based approach for personality trait induction in LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-16T07:47:45Z) - Quantifying AI Psychology: A Psychometrics Benchmark for Large Language Models [57.518784855080334]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional task-solving capabilities, increasingly adopting roles akin to human-like assistants.
This paper presents a framework for investigating psychology dimension in LLMs, including psychological identification, assessment dataset curation, and assessment with results validation.
We introduce a comprehensive psychometrics benchmark for LLMs that covers six psychological dimensions: personality, values, emotion, theory of mind, motivation, and intelligence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-25T16:09:08Z) - MR-Ben: A Meta-Reasoning Benchmark for Evaluating System-2 Thinking in LLMs [55.20845457594977]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown increasing capability in problem-solving and decision-making.
We present a process-based benchmark MR-Ben that demands a meta-reasoning skill.
Our meta-reasoning paradigm is especially suited for system-2 slow thinking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T03:50:23Z) - Using LLMs to Aid Annotation and Collection of Clinically-Enriched Data in Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia [9.804382916824245]
This paper demonstrates the application of contemporary language models in sequence-to-sequence tasks to enhance mental health research.
We show that small models are capable of annotation for domain-specific clinical variables, data collection for mental-health instruments, and perform better then commercial large models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-18T15:00:24Z) - Adapting Mental Health Prediction Tasks for Cross-lingual Learning via Meta-Training and In-context Learning with Large Language Model [3.3590922002216193]
We use model-agnostic meta-learning and leveraging large language models (LLMs) to address this gap.
We first apply a meta-learning model with self-supervision, which results in improved model initialisation for rapid adaptation and cross-lingual transfer.
In parallel, we use LLMs' in-context learning capabilities to assess their performance accuracy across the Swahili mental health prediction tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-13T17:11:35Z) - Learning to Generate Explainable Stock Predictions using Self-Reflective
Large Language Models [54.21695754082441]
We propose a framework to teach Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate explainable stock predictions.
A reflective agent learns how to explain past stock movements through self-reasoning, while the PPO trainer trains the model to generate the most likely explanations.
Our framework can outperform both traditional deep-learning and LLM methods in prediction accuracy and Matthews correlation coefficient.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-06T03:18:58Z) - Interpreting Pretrained Language Models via Concept Bottlenecks [55.47515772358389]
Pretrained language models (PLMs) have made significant strides in various natural language processing tasks.
The lack of interpretability due to their black-box'' nature poses challenges for responsible implementation.
We propose a novel approach to interpreting PLMs by employing high-level, meaningful concepts that are easily understandable for humans.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-08T20:41:18Z) - Explainable Depression Symptom Detection in Social Media [2.677715367737641]
We propose using transformer-based architectures to detect and explain the appearance of depressive symptom markers in the users' writings.
Our natural language explanations enable clinicians to interpret the models' decisions based on validated symptoms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-20T17:05:27Z) - MentaLLaMA: Interpretable Mental Health Analysis on Social Media with
Large Language Models [28.62967557368565]
We build the first multi-task and multi-source interpretable mental health instruction dataset on social media, with 105K data samples.
We use expert-written few-shot prompts and collected labels to prompt ChatGPT and obtain explanations from its responses.
Based on the IMHI dataset and LLaMA2 foundation models, we train MentalLLaMA, the first open-source LLM series for interpretable mental health analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-24T06:46:08Z) - Automatically Correcting Large Language Models: Surveying the landscape
of diverse self-correction strategies [104.32199881187607]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across a wide array of NLP tasks.
A promising approach to rectify these flaws is self-correction, where the LLM itself is prompted or guided to fix problems in its own output.
This paper presents a comprehensive review of this emerging class of techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-06T18:38:52Z) - Towards Interpretable Mental Health Analysis with Large Language Models [27.776003210275608]
We evaluate the mental health analysis and emotional reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs) on 11 datasets across 5 tasks.
Based on prompts, we explore LLMs for interpretable mental health analysis by instructing them to generate explanations for each of their decisions.
We convey strict human evaluations to assess the quality of the generated explanations, leading to a novel dataset with 163 human-assessed explanations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-06T19:53:59Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.