Personas with Attitudes: Controlling LLMs for Diverse Data Annotation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.11745v1
• Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 16:22:49 GMT
• Title: Personas with Attitudes: Controlling LLMs for Diverse Data Annotation
• Authors: Leon Fröhling, Gianluca Demartini, Dennis Assenmacher,
• Abstract summary: We present a novel approach for enhancing diversity and control in data annotation tasks by personalizing large language models (LLMs) We investigate whether personas increase annotation diversity and whether the impacts of individual personas on the resulting annotations are consistent and controllable.
• Score: 4.916264341371062
• License:
• Abstract: We present a novel approach for enhancing diversity and control in data annotation tasks by personalizing large language models (LLMs). We investigate the impact of injecting diverse persona descriptions into LLM prompts across two studies, exploring whether personas increase annotation diversity and whether the impacts of individual personas on the resulting annotations are consistent and controllable. Our results show that persona-prompted LLMs produce more diverse annotations than LLMs prompted without personas and that these effects are both controllable and repeatable, making our approach a suitable tool for improving data annotation in subjective NLP tasks like toxicity detection.

Related papers

• Mitigating Biases to Embrace Diversity: A Comprehensive Annotation Benchmark for Toxic Language [0.0]
  This study introduces a prescriptive annotation benchmark grounded in humanities research to ensure consistent, unbiased labeling of offensive language. We contribute two newly annotated datasets that achieve higher inter-annotator agreement between human and language model (LLM) annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T08:10:24Z)
• Hate Personified: Investigating the role of LLMs in content moderation [64.26243779985393]
  For subjective tasks such as hate detection, where people perceive hate differently, the Large Language Model's (LLM) ability to represent diverse groups is unclear. By including additional context in prompts, we analyze LLM's sensitivity to geographical priming, persona attributes, and numerical information to assess how well the needs of various groups are reflected.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T16:43:17Z)
• SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
  Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts. We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM. We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z)
• Few-shot Personalization of LLMs with Mis-aligned Responses [40.0349773257245]
  This paper proposes a new approach for a few-shot personalization of large language models (LLMs) Our key idea is to learn a set of personalized prompts for each user by progressively improving the prompts using LLMs. During an iterative process of prompt improvement, we incorporate the contexts of mis-aligned responses by LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-26T18:29:12Z)
• Large Language Models for Data Annotation: A Survey [49.8318827245266]
  The emergence of advanced Large Language Models (LLMs) presents an unprecedented opportunity to automate the complicated process of data annotation. This survey includes an in-depth taxonomy of data types that LLMs can annotate, a review of learning strategies for models utilizing LLM-generated annotations, and a detailed discussion of the primary challenges and limitations associated with using LLMs for data annotation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T00:44:04Z)
• C-ICL: Contrastive In-context Learning for Information Extraction [54.39470114243744]
  c-ICL is a novel few-shot technique that leverages both correct and incorrect sample constructions to create in-context learning demonstrations. Our experiments on various datasets indicate that c-ICL outperforms previous few-shot in-context learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T11:28:08Z)
• Personalized Large Language Models [1.0881867638866944]
  This paper investigates methods to personalize large language models (LLMs) Results demonstrate that personalized fine-tuning improves model reasoning compared to non-personalized models. Experiments on datasets for emotion recognition and hate speech detection show consistent performance gains with personalized methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T15:55:30Z)
• On the steerability of large language models toward data-driven personas [98.9138902560793]
  Large language models (LLMs) are known to generate biased responses where the opinions of certain groups and populations are underrepresented. Here, we present a novel approach to achieve controllable generation of specific viewpoints using LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-08T19:01:13Z)
• CoAnnotating: Uncertainty-Guided Work Allocation between Human and Large Language Models for Data Annotation [94.59630161324013]
  We propose CoAnnotating, a novel paradigm for Human-LLM co-annotation of unstructured texts at scale. Our empirical study shows CoAnnotating to be an effective means to allocate work from results on different datasets, with up to 21% performance improvement over random baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T08:56:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.