Concept-Reversed Winograd Schema Challenge: Evaluating and Improving Robust Reasoning in Large Language Models via Abstraction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.12040v1
• Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 20:19:27 GMT
• Title: Concept-Reversed Winograd Schema Challenge: Evaluating and Improving Robust Reasoning in Large Language Models via Abstraction
• Authors: Kaiqiao Han, Tianqing Fang, Zhaowei Wang, Yangqiu Song, Mark Steedman,
• Abstract summary: We evaluate the extent to which Large Language Models (LLMs) perform robust reasoning instead of relying on superficial logical chains. We propose a new evaluation dataset, the Concept-Reversed Winograd Challenge (CR-WSC), based on the famous Winograd Challenge (WSC) dataset.
• Score: 48.20754793102953
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: While Large Language Models (LLMs) have showcased remarkable proficiency in reasoning, there is still a concern about hallucinations and unreliable reasoning issues due to semantic associations and superficial logical chains. To evaluate the extent to which LLMs perform robust reasoning instead of relying on superficial logical chains, we propose a new evaluation dataset, the Concept-Reversed Winograd Schema Challenge (CR-WSC), based on the famous Winograd Schema Challenge (WSC) dataset. By simply reversing the concepts to those that are more associated with the wrong answer, we find that the performance of LLMs drops significantly despite the rationale of reasoning remaining the same. Furthermore, we propose Abstraction-of-Thought (AoT), a novel prompt method for recovering adversarial cases to normal cases using conceptual abstraction to improve LLMs' robustness and consistency in reasoning, as demonstrated by experiments on CR-WSC.

Related papers

• The Curse of CoT: On the Limitations of Chain-of-Thought in In-Context Learning [39.613595533503144]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has been widely recognized for its ability to enhance reasoning capabilities in large language models. We show that CoT consistently underperforms direct answering across varying model scales and benchmark complexities. Our analysis uncovers a fundamental explicit-implicit duality driving CoT's performance in pattern-based ICL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T13:51:06Z)
• CrossWordBench: Evaluating the Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs and LVLMs with Controllable Puzzle Generation [53.452699232071495]
  CrossWordBench is a benchmark designed to evaluate the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) through the medium of crossword puzzles. Our evaluation reveals that reasoning LLMs outperform non-reasoning models substantially by effectively leveraging crossing-letter constraints. Our findings offer insights into the limitations of the reasoning capabilities of current LLMs and LVLMs, and provide an effective approach for creating multimodal constrained tasks for future evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-30T20:03:36Z)
• OpenVLThinker: An Early Exploration to Complex Vision-Language Reasoning via Iterative Self-Improvement [91.88062410741833]
  This study investigates whether similar reasoning capabilities can be successfully integrated into large vision-language models (LVLMs) We consider an approach that iteratively leverages supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on lightweight training data and Reinforcement Learning (RL) to further improve model generalization. OpenVLThinker, a LVLM exhibiting consistently improved reasoning performance on challenging benchmarks such as MathVista, MathVerse, and MathVision, demonstrates the potential of our strategy for robust vision-language reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T17:52:43Z)
• ZebraLogic: On the Scaling Limits of LLMs for Logical Reasoning [92.76959707441954]
  We introduce ZebraLogic, a comprehensive evaluation framework for assessing LLM reasoning performance. ZebraLogic enables the generation of puzzles with controllable and quantifiable complexity. Our results reveal a significant decline in accuracy as problem complexity grows.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T06:44:49Z)
• Reinforcing Thinking through Reasoning-Enhanced Reward Models [6.636512424910708]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit great potential in complex multi-step reasoning through inference-time thinking. LLMs struggle with deciding when to stop thinking due to limited self-awareness about their knowledge boundaries. This work addresses these challenges by distilling the LLM's own reasoning processes into synthetic behavioral data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-31T04:50:15Z)
• Critical-Questions-of-Thought: Steering LLM reasoning with Argumentative Querying [0.3659498819753633]
  State-of-the-art Large Language models (LLMs) continue to struggle when performing logical and mathematical reasoning. This paper makes use of the notion of critical questions from the literature on argumentation theory, focusing in particular on Toulmin's model of argumentation. We show that employing these critical questions can improve the reasoning capabilities of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T18:51:30Z)
• Leveraging LLMs for Hypothetical Deduction in Logical Inference: A Neuro-Symbolic Approach [11.400815134634016]
  We introduce LINA, a neuro-symbolic approach for faithful logical reasoning. By enabling an LLM to autonomously perform the transition from propositional logic extraction to sophisticated logical reasoning, LINA bolsters the resilience of the reasoning process. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that LINA substantially outperforms both established propositional logic frameworks and conventional prompting techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T06:38:46Z)
• Reversal of Thought: Enhancing Large Language Models with Preference-Guided Reverse Reasoning Warm-up [9.42385235462794]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance in reasoning tasks but face limitations in mathematical and complex logical reasoning. We propose Reversal of Thought (RoT), a novel framework aimed at enhancing the logical reasoning abilities of LLMs. RoT utilizes a Preference-Guided Reverse Reasoning warm-up strategy, which integrates logical symbols for pseudocode planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T07:44:28Z)
• Enhancing Logical Reasoning in Large Language Models through Graph-based Synthetic Data [53.433309883370974]
  This work explores the potential and limitations of using graph-based synthetic reasoning data as training signals to enhance Large Language Models' reasoning capabilities. Our experiments, conducted on two established natural language reasoning tasks, demonstrate that supervised fine-tuning with synthetic graph-based reasoning data effectively enhances LLMs' reasoning performance without compromising their effectiveness on other standard evaluation benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-19T03:39:09Z)
• MR-Ben: A Meta-Reasoning Benchmark for Evaluating System-2 Thinking in LLMs [55.20845457594977]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown increasing capability in problem-solving and decision-making. We present a process-based benchmark MR-Ben that demands a meta-reasoning skill. Our meta-reasoning paradigm is especially suited for system-2 slow thinking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T03:50:23Z)
• On the Hardness of Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models [25.029579061612456]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being employed in real-world applications in critical domains such as healthcare. It is important to ensure that the Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning generated by these models faithfully captures their underlying behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-15T13:16:44Z)
• Aggregation of Reasoning: A Hierarchical Framework for Enhancing Answer Selection in Large Language Models [84.15513004135576]
  Current research enhances the reasoning performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) by sampling multiple reasoning chains and ensembling based on the answer frequency. This approach fails in scenarios where the correct answers are in the minority. We introduce a hierarchical reasoning aggregation framework AoR, which selects answers based on the evaluation of reasoning chains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T17:12:19Z)
• Learning Planning-based Reasoning by Trajectories Collection and Process Reward Synthesizing [61.98556945939045]
  We propose a framework to learn planning-based reasoning through Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) on collected trajectories. Our results on challenging logical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our learning framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T15:18:33Z)
• Concise and Organized Perception Facilitates Reasoning in Large Language Models [32.71672086718057]
  We show that large language models (LLMs) exhibit failure patterns akin to human-like cognitive biases when dealing with disordered and irrelevant content in reasoning tasks. We propose a novel reasoning approach named Concise and Organized Perception (COP) COP carefully analyzes the given statements to identify the most pertinent information while eliminating redundancy efficiently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T04:47:49Z)
• Learning a Structural Causal Model for Intuition Reasoning in Conversation [20.243323155177766]
  Reasoning, a crucial aspect of NLP research, has not been adequately addressed by prevailing models. We develop a conversation cognitive model ( CCM) that explains how each utterance receives and activates channels of information. By leveraging variational inference, it explores substitutes for implicit causes, addresses the issue of their unobservability, and reconstructs the causal representations of utterances through the evidence lower bounds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-28T13:54:09Z)
• Enhancing Chain-of-Thoughts Prompting with Iterative Bootstrapping in Large Language Models [81.01397924280612]
  Large language models (LLMs) can achieve highly effective performance on various reasoning tasks by incorporating step-by-step chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting as demonstrations. We introduce Iter-CoT (Iterative bootstrapping in Chain-of-Thoughts Prompting), an iterative bootstrapping approach for selecting exemplars and generating reasoning chains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-23T13:54:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.