HumanEval-V: Benchmarking High-Level Visual Reasoning with Complex Diagrams in Coding Tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.12381v3
• Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 06:00:26 GMT
• Title: HumanEval-V: Benchmarking High-Level Visual Reasoning with Complex Diagrams in Coding Tasks
• Authors: Fengji Zhang, Linquan Wu, Huiyu Bai, Guancheng Lin, Xiao Li, Xiao Yu, Yue Wang, Bei Chen, Jacky Keung,
• Abstract summary: We present HumanEval-V, a benchmark of human-annotated coding tasks. Each task features carefully crafted diagrams paired with function signatures and test cases. We find that even top-performing models achieve modest success rates.
• Score: 25.959032350818795
• License:
• Abstract: Understanding and reasoning over diagrams is a fundamental aspect of human intelligence. While Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities across various tasks, existing benchmarks lack comprehensive evaluation of their diagram interpretation and reasoning abilities, particularly in coding contexts. We present HumanEval-V, a rigorous benchmark of human-annotated coding tasks that spans six task types and evaluates diverse visual reasoning capabilities. Each task features carefully crafted diagrams paired with function signatures and test cases, employing novel code generation tasks to thoroughly assess models' diagram comprehension. Through extensive experiments with 22 LMMs, we find that even top-performing models achieve modest success rates, with Claude 3.5 Sonnet reaching only 36.8% pass@1, highlighting substantial room for improvement. Our analysis reveals that current LMMs struggle with spatial transformations, topological relationships, and dynamic patterns that humans find intuitive. These findings provide valuable insights for advancing LMMs' visual reasoning abilities. We have open-sourced our code and benchmark at https://github.com/HumanEval-V/HumanEval-V-Benchmark.

Related papers

• Why Vision Language Models Struggle with Visual Arithmetic? Towards Enhanced Chart and Geometry Understanding [94.64781599202882]
  Vision Language Models (VLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in multimodal tasks. They often struggle with visual arithmetic, seemingly simple capabilities like object counting or length comparison. We propose CogAlign, a novel post-training strategy inspired by Piaget's theory of cognitive development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T06:54:49Z)
• LlamaV-o1: Rethinking Step-by-step Visual Reasoning in LLMs [103.0226977561914]
  We propose a comprehensive framework for advancing step-by-step visual reasoning in large language models. We introduce a visual reasoning benchmark specifically designed to evaluate multi-step reasoning tasks. Second, we propose a novel metric that assesses visual reasoning quality at the granularity of individual steps. Third, we present a new multimodal visual reasoning model, named LlamaV-o1, trained using a multi-step curriculum learning approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-10T18:59:51Z)
• MageBench: Bridging Large Multimodal Models to Agents [90.59091431806793]
  LMMs have shown impressive visual understanding capabilities, with the potential to be applied in agents. Existing benchmarks mostly assess their reasoning abilities in language part. MageBench is a reasoning capability oriented multimodal agent benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-05T17:08:19Z)
• Intriguing Properties of Large Language and Vision Models [18.449076451976236]
  Large language and vision models (LLVMs) have received significant attention and development efforts due to their remarkable generalization performance. Despite their achievements in advanced reasoning tasks, their performance on fundamental perception-related tasks remains surprisingly low. We investigate this question by evaluating the most common LLVM's families (i.e., LLaVA) across 10 evaluation benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T05:07:01Z)
• Multimodal LLMs Struggle with Basic Visual Network Analysis: a VNA Benchmark [4.112909937203117]
  We evaluate the zero-shot ability of GPT-4 and LLaVa to perform simple Visual Network Analysis tasks on small-scale graphs. We find that while GPT-4 consistently outperforms LLaVa, both models struggle with every visual network analysis task we propose.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T17:51:35Z)
• Lumen: Unleashing Versatile Vision-Centric Capabilities of Large Multimodal Models [87.47400128150032]
  We propose a novel LMM architecture named Lumen, a Large multimodal model with versatile vision-centric capability enhancement. Lumen first promotes fine-grained vision-language concept alignment. Then the task-specific decoding is carried out by flexibly routing the shared representation to lightweight task decoders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T04:13:45Z)
• Q-Align: Teaching LMMs for Visual Scoring via Discrete Text-Defined Levels [95.44077384918725]
  We propose to teach large multi-modality models (LMMs) with text-defined rating levels instead of scores. The proposed Q-Align achieves state-of-the-art performance on image quality assessment (IQA), image aesthetic assessment (IAA) and video quality assessment (VQA) tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-28T16:10:25Z)
• BloomVQA: Assessing Hierarchical Multi-modal Comprehension [18.21961616174999]
  We collect multiple-choice samples based on picture stories that reflect different levels of comprehension. Our data maps to a novel hierarchical graph representation which enables automatic data augmentation and novel measures characterizing model consistency. In comparison to earlier models, GPT-4V demonstrates improved accuracy over all comprehension levels and shows a tendency of bypassing visual inputs especially for higher-level tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-20T02:22:49Z)
• MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player? [114.45702807380415]
  We propose MMBench, a benchmark for assessing the multi-modal capabilities of vision-language models. MMBench is meticulously curated with well-designed quality control schemes. MMBench incorporates multiple-choice questions in both English and Chinese versions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-12T16:23:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.