Exploring Model Kinship for Merging Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.12613v2
• Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2025 10:39:29 GMT
• Title: Exploring Model Kinship for Merging Large Language Models
• Authors: Yedi Hu, Yunzhi Yao, Shumin Deng, Huajun Chen, Ningyu Zhang,
• Abstract summary: We introduce model kinship, the degree of similarity or relatedness between Large Language Models.<n>We find that there is a certain relationship between model kinship and the performance gains after model merging.<n>We propose a new model merging strategy: Top-k Greedy Merging with Model Kinship, which can yield better performance on benchmark datasets.
• Score: 52.01652098827454
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Model merging has become one of the key technologies for enhancing the capabilities and efficiency of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, our understanding of the expected performance gains and principles when merging any two models remains limited. In this work, we introduce model kinship, the degree of similarity or relatedness between LLMs, analogous to biological evolution. With comprehensive empirical analysis, we find that there is a certain relationship between model kinship and the performance gains after model merging, which can help guide our selection of candidate models. Inspired by this, we propose a new model merging strategy: Top-k Greedy Merging with Model Kinship, which can yield better performance on benchmark datasets. Specifically, we discover that using model kinship as a criterion can assist us in continuously performing model merging, alleviating the degradation (local optima) in model evolution, whereas model kinship can serve as a guide to escape these traps. Code is available at https://github.com/zjunlp/ModelKinship.

Related papers

• Why Do More Experts Fail? A Theoretical Analysis of Model Merging [51.18155031364046]
  Model merging dramatically reduces storage and computational resources by combining multiple expert models into a single multi-task model.<n>Recent model merging methods have shown promising results, but struggle to maintain performance gains as the number of merged models increases.<n>We show that the limited effective parameter space imposes a strict constraint on the number of models that can be successfully merged.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T14:10:46Z)
• Unifying Multimodal Large Language Model Capabilities and Modalities via Model Merging [103.98582374569789]
  Model merging aims to combine multiple expert models into a single model, thereby reducing storage and serving costs.<n>Previous studies have primarily focused on merging visual classification models or Large Language Models (LLMs) for code and math tasks.<n>We introduce the model merging benchmark for MLLMs, which includes multiple tasks such as VQA, Geometry, Chart, OCR, and Grounding, providing both LoRA and full fine-tuning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T12:23:14Z)
• Multi-Level Collaboration in Model Merging [56.31088116526825]
  This paper explores the intrinsic connections between model merging and model ensembling. We find that even when previous restrictions are not met, there is still a way for model merging to attain a near-identical and superior performance similar to that of ensembling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T07:45:04Z)
• In-Model Merging for Enhancing the Robustness of Medical Imaging Classification Models [5.871732354387235]
  We propose in-model merging (InMerge), a novel approach that enhances the model's robustness. We demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of this technique for different CNN architectures. The proposed InMerge-trained model surpasses the typically-trained model by a substantial margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T20:52:55Z)
• Training-free Heterogeneous Model Merging [40.681362819808136]
  We propose an innovative model merging framework designed for heterogeneous models. We show that the merging of structurally heterogeneous models can achieve performance levels comparable to those of homogeneous merging. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/zju-vipa/training_free_heterogeneous_model_merging.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-29T04:49:11Z)
• A Collaborative Ensemble Framework for CTR Prediction [73.59868761656317]
  We propose a novel framework, Collaborative Ensemble Training Network (CETNet), to leverage multiple distinct models. Unlike naive model scaling, our approach emphasizes diversity and collaboration through collaborative learning. We validate our framework on three public datasets and a large-scale industrial dataset from Meta.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-20T20:38:56Z)
• Model-GLUE: Democratized LLM Scaling for A Large Model Zoo in the Wild [84.57103623507082]
  This paper introduces Model-GLUE, a holistic Large Language Models scaling guideline. Our work starts with a benchmarking of existing LLM scaling techniques, especially selective merging, and variants of mixture. Our methodology involves the clustering of mergeable models and optimal merging strategy selection, and the integration of clusters through a model mixture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T15:55:55Z)
• What Matters for Model Merging at Scale? [94.26607564817786]
  Model merging aims to combine multiple expert models into a more capable single model. Previous studies have primarily focused on merging a few small models. This study systematically evaluates the utility of model merging at scale.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T17:17:19Z)
• Knowledge Fusion By Evolving Weights of Language Models [5.354527640064584]
  This paper examines the approach of integrating multiple models into a unified model. We propose a knowledge fusion method named Evolver, inspired by evolutionary algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T02:12:34Z)
• EMR-Merging: Tuning-Free High-Performance Model Merging [55.03509900949149]
  We show that Elect, Mask & Rescale-Merging (EMR-Merging) shows outstanding performance compared to existing merging methods. EMR-Merging is tuning-free, thus requiring no data availability or any additional training while showing impressive performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T05:25:45Z)
• Comparing Foundation Models using Data Kernels [13.099029073152257]
  We present a methodology for directly comparing the embedding space geometry of foundation models. Our methodology is grounded in random graph theory and enables valid hypothesis testing of embedding similarity. We show how our framework can induce a manifold of models equipped with a distance function that correlates strongly with several downstream metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-09T02:01:07Z)
• Dataless Knowledge Fusion by Merging Weights of Language Models [51.8162883997512]
  Fine-tuning pre-trained language models has become the prevalent paradigm for building downstream NLP models. This creates a barrier to fusing knowledge across individual models to yield a better single model. We propose a dataless knowledge fusion method that merges models in their parameter space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T20:46:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.