Advancing Large Language Model Attribution through Self-Improving
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.13298v1
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 07:55:33 GMT
- Title: Advancing Large Language Model Attribution through Self-Improving
- Authors: Lei Huang, Xiaocheng Feng, Weitao Ma, Liang Zhao, Yuchun Fan, Weihong Zhong, Dongliang Xu, Qing Yang, Hongtao Liu, Bing Qin,
- Abstract summary: We present START, a framework for improving the attribution capability of large language models (LLMs)
START iteratively utilizes fine-grained preference supervision signals constructed from its sampled responses to encourage robust, comprehensive, and attributable generation.
Experiments on three open-domain question-answering datasets, covering long-form QA and multi-step reasoning, demonstrate significant performance gains of 25.13% on average.
- Score: 32.77250400438304
- License:
- Abstract: Teaching large language models (LLMs) to generate text with citations to evidence sources can mitigate hallucinations and enhance verifiability in information-seeking systems. However, improving this capability requires high-quality attribution data, which is costly and labor-intensive. Inspired by recent advances in self-improvement that enhance LLMs without manual annotation, we present START, a Self-Taught AttRibuTion framework for iteratively improving the attribution capability of LLMs. First, to prevent models from stagnating due to initially insufficient supervision signals, START leverages the model to self-construct synthetic training data for warming up. To further self-improve the model's attribution ability, START iteratively utilizes fine-grained preference supervision signals constructed from its sampled responses to encourage robust, comprehensive, and attributable generation. Experiments on three open-domain question-answering datasets, covering long-form QA and multi-step reasoning, demonstrate significant performance gains of 25.13% on average without relying on human annotations and more advanced models. Further analysis reveals that START excels in aggregating information across multiple sources.
Related papers
- Forewarned is Forearmed: Leveraging LLMs for Data Synthesis through Failure-Inducing Exploration [90.41908331897639]
Large language models (LLMs) have significantly benefited from training on diverse, high-quality task-specific data.
We present a novel approach, ReverseGen, designed to automatically generate effective training samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-22T06:43:28Z) - Self-Boosting Large Language Models with Synthetic Preference Data [97.94185115047999]
We introduce SynPO, a self-boosting paradigm that leverages synthetic preference data for model alignment.
After four SynPO iterations, Llama3-8B and Mistral-7B show significant enhancements in instruction-following abilities.
SynPO improves the general performance of LLMs on various tasks, validated by a 3.2 to 5.0 average score increase on the well-recognized Open LLM leaderboard.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-09T14:57:31Z) - Semi-Supervised Reward Modeling via Iterative Self-Training [52.48668920483908]
We propose Semi-Supervised Reward Modeling (SSRM), an approach that enhances RM training using unlabeled data.
We demonstrate that SSRM significantly improves reward models without incurring additional labeling costs.
Overall, SSRM substantially reduces the dependency on large volumes of human-annotated data, thereby decreasing the overall cost and time involved in training effective reward models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-10T22:57:58Z) - SIaM: Self-Improving Code-Assisted Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models [54.78329741186446]
We propose a novel paradigm that uses a code-based critic model to guide steps including question-code data construction, quality control, and complementary evaluation.
Experiments across both in-domain and out-of-domain benchmarks in English and Chinese demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed paradigm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-28T06:33:03Z) - Improving Retrieval Augmented Language Model with Self-Reasoning [20.715106330314605]
We propose a novel self-reasoning framework aimed at improving the reliability and traceability of RALMs.
The framework involves constructing self-reason trajectories with three processes: a relevance-aware process, an evidence-aware selective process, and a trajectory analysis process.
We have evaluated our framework across four public datasets to demonstrate the superiority of our method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-29T09:05:10Z) - Improving Attributed Text Generation of Large Language Models via Preference Learning [28.09715554543885]
We model the attribution task as preference learning and introduce an Automatic Preference Optimization framework.
APO achieves state-of-the-art citation F1 with higher answer quality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-27T09:19:13Z) - ReEval: Automatic Hallucination Evaluation for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models via Transferable Adversarial Attacks [91.55895047448249]
This paper presents ReEval, an LLM-based framework using prompt chaining to perturb the original evidence for generating new test cases.
We implement ReEval using ChatGPT and evaluate the resulting variants of two popular open-domain QA datasets.
Our generated data is human-readable and useful to trigger hallucination in large language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-19T06:37:32Z) - SELF: Self-Evolution with Language Feedback [68.6673019284853]
'SELF' (Self-Evolution with Language Feedback) is a novel approach to advance large language models.
It enables LLMs to self-improve through self-reflection, akin to human learning processes.
Our experiments in mathematics and general tasks demonstrate that SELF can enhance the capabilities of LLMs without human intervention.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-01T00:52:24Z) - Enabling Large Language Models to Generate Text with Citations [37.64884969997378]
Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a widely-used tool for information seeking.
Our aim is to allow LLMs to generate text with citations, improving their factual correctness and verifiability.
We propose ALCE, the first benchmark for Automatic LLMs' Citation Evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T01:53:49Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.