Identifying Privacy Personas

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.14023v1
• Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 20:49:46 GMT
• Title: Identifying Privacy Personas
• Authors: Olena Hrynenko, Andrea Cavallaro,
• Abstract summary: Privacy personas capture the differences in user segments with respect to one's knowledge, behavioural patterns, level of self-efficacy, and perception of the importance of privacy protection. While various privacy personas have been derived in the literature, they group together people who differ from each other in terms of important attributes. We propose eight personas that we derive by combining qualitative and quantitative analysis of the responses to an interactive educational questionnaire.
• Score: 27.301741710016223
• License:
• Abstract: Privacy personas capture the differences in user segments with respect to one's knowledge, behavioural patterns, level of self-efficacy, and perception of the importance of privacy protection. Modelling these differences is essential for appropriately choosing personalised communication about privacy (e.g. to increase literacy) and for defining suitable choices for privacy enhancing technologies (PETs). While various privacy personas have been derived in the literature, they group together people who differ from each other in terms of important attributes such as perceived or desired level of control, and motivation to use PET. To address this lack of granularity and comprehensiveness in describing personas, we propose eight personas that we derive by combining qualitative and quantitative analysis of the responses to an interactive educational questionnaire. We design an analysis pipeline that uses divisive hierarchical clustering and Boschloo's statistical test of homogeneity of proportions to ensure that the elicited clusters differ from each other based on a statistical measure. Additionally, we propose a new measure for calculating distances between questionnaire responses, that accounts for the type of the question (closed- vs open-ended) used to derive traits. We show that the proposed privacy personas statistically differ from each other. We statistically validate the proposed personas and also compare them with personas in the literature, showing that they provide a more granular and comprehensive understanding of user segments, which will allow to better assist users with their privacy needs.

Related papers

• Mind the Privacy Unit! User-Level Differential Privacy for Language Model Fine-Tuning [62.224804688233]
  differential privacy (DP) offers a promising solution by ensuring models are 'almost indistinguishable' with or without any particular privacy unit. We study user-level DP motivated by applications where it necessary to ensure uniform privacy protection across users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T13:54:32Z)
• Systematic Review on Privacy Categorization [1.5377372227901214]
  This work aims to present a systematic review of the literature on privacy categorization. Privacy categorization involves the possibility to classify users according to specific prerequisites.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-07T15:18:26Z)
• Enabling Trade-offs in Privacy and Utility in Genomic Data Beacons and Summary Statistics [26.99521354120141]
  We introduce optimization-based approaches to explicitly trade off the utility of summary data or Beacon responses and privacy. In the first, an attacker applies a likelihood-ratio test to make membership-inference claims. In the second, an attacker uses a threshold that accounts for the effect of the data release on the separation in scores between individuals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-11T19:16:13Z)
• How Do Input Attributes Impact the Privacy Loss in Differential Privacy? [55.492422758737575]
  We study the connection between the per-subject norm in DP neural networks and individual privacy loss. We introduce a novel metric termed the Privacy Loss-Input Susceptibility (PLIS) which allows one to apportion the subject's privacy loss to their input attributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-18T11:39:03Z)
• On the Statistical Complexity of Estimation and Testing under Privacy Constraints [17.04261371990489]
  We show how to characterize the power of a statistical test under differential privacy in a plug-and-play fashion. We show that maintaining privacy results in a noticeable reduction in performance only when the level of privacy protection is very high. Finally, we demonstrate that the DP-SGLD algorithm, a private convex solver, can be employed for maximum likelihood estimation with a high degree of confidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-05T12:55:53Z)
• Algorithms with More Granular Differential Privacy Guarantees [65.3684804101664]
  We consider partial differential privacy (DP), which allows quantifying the privacy guarantee on a per-attribute basis. In this work, we study several basic data analysis and learning tasks, and design algorithms whose per-attribute privacy parameter is smaller that the best possible privacy parameter for the entire record of a person.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-08T22:43:50Z)
• "Am I Private and If So, how Many?" -- Using Risk Communication Formats for Making Differential Privacy Understandable [0.0]
  We adapt risk communication formats in conjunction with a model for the privacy risks of Differential Privacy. We evaluate these novel privacy communication formats in a crowdsourced study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-08T13:30:07Z)
• Partial sensitivity analysis in differential privacy [58.730520380312676]
  We investigate the impact of each input feature on the individual's privacy loss. We experimentally evaluate our approach on queries over private databases. We also explore our findings in the context of neural network training on synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-22T08:29:16Z)
• Robustness Threats of Differential Privacy [70.818129585404]
  We experimentally demonstrate that networks, trained with differential privacy, in some settings might be even more vulnerable in comparison to non-private versions. We study how the main ingredients of differentially private neural networks training, such as gradient clipping and noise addition, affect the robustness of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-14T18:59:24Z)
• Differentially Private and Fair Deep Learning: A Lagrangian Dual Approach [54.32266555843765]
  This paper studies a model that protects the privacy of the individuals sensitive information while also allowing it to learn non-discriminatory predictors. The method relies on the notion of differential privacy and the use of Lagrangian duality to design neural networks that can accommodate fairness constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-26T10:50:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.