Curriculum Reinforcement Learning for Complex Reward Functions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.16790v2
• Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 10:42:49 GMT
• Title: Curriculum Reinforcement Learning for Complex Reward Functions
• Authors: Kilian Freitag, Kristian Ceder, Rita Laezza, Knut Åkesson, Morteza Haghir Chehreghani,
• Abstract summary: We propose a two-stage reward curriculum that first maximizes a simple reward function and then transitions to the full, complex reward.<n>We evaluate our method on the DeepMind control suite, modified to include an additional constraint term in the reward definitions.<n>Our results demonstrate the potential of two-stage reward curricula for efficient and stable RL in environments with complex rewards.
• Score: 5.78463306498655
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a powerful tool for tackling control problems, but its practical application is often hindered by the complexity arising from intricate reward functions with multiple terms. The reward hypothesis posits that any objective can be encapsulated in a scalar reward function, yet balancing individual, potentially adversarial, reward terms without exploitation remains challenging. To overcome the limitations of traditional RL methods, which often require precise balancing of competing reward terms, we propose a two-stage reward curriculum that first maximizes a simple reward function and then transitions to the full, complex reward. We provide a method based on how well an actor fits a critic to automatically determine the transition point between the two stages. Additionally, we introduce a flexible replay buffer that enables efficient phase transfer by reusing samples from one stage in the next. We evaluate our method on the DeepMind control suite, modified to include an additional constraint term in the reward definitions. We further evaluate our method in a mobile robot scenario with even more competing reward terms. In both settings, our two-stage reward curriculum achieves a substantial improvement in performance compared to a baseline trained without curriculum. Instead of exploiting the constraint term in the reward, it is able to learn policies that balance task completion and constraint satisfaction. Our results demonstrate the potential of two-stage reward curricula for efficient and stable RL in environments with complex rewards, paving the way for more robust and adaptable robotic systems in real-world applications.

Related papers

• Adaptive Reward Design for Reinforcement Learning in Complex Robotic Tasks [2.3031174164121127]
  We propose a suite of reward functions that incentivize an RL agent to make measurable progress on tasks specified by formulas. We develop an adaptive reward shaping approach that dynamically updates these reward functions during the learning process. Experimental results on a range of RL-based robotic tasks demonstrate that the proposed approach is compatible with various RL algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-14T18:04:18Z)
• Stage-Wise Reward Shaping for Acrobatic Robots: A Constrained Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning Approach [12.132416927711036]
  We introduce an RL method aimed at simplifying the reward-shaping process through intuitive strategies. We define multiple reward and cost functions within a constrained multi-objective RL (CMORL) framework. For tasks involving sequential complex movements, we segment the task into distinct stages and define multiple rewards and costs for each stage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T05:25:24Z)
• Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Smoothed Log Barrier Function [27.216122901635018]
  We propose a new constrained RL method called CSAC-LB (Constrained Soft Actor-Critic with Log Barrier Function) It achieves competitive performance without any pre-training by applying a linear smoothed log barrier function to an additional safety critic. We show that with CSAC-LB, we achieve state-of-the-art performance on several constrained control tasks with different levels of difficulty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T16:02:52Z)
• Dense Reward for Free in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback [64.92448888346125]
  We leverage the fact that the reward model contains more information than just its scalar output. We use these attention weights to redistribute the reward along the whole completion. Empirically, we show that it stabilises training, accelerates the rate of learning, and, in practical cases, may lead to better local optima.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T17:10:35Z)
• REBEL: Reward Regularization-Based Approach for Robotic Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback [61.54791065013767]
  A misalignment between the reward function and human preferences can lead to catastrophic outcomes in the real world. Recent methods aim to mitigate misalignment by learning reward functions from human preferences. We propose a novel concept of reward regularization within the robotic RLHF framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T04:56:37Z)
• Behavior Alignment via Reward Function Optimization [23.92721220310242]
  We introduce a new framework that integrates auxiliary rewards reflecting a designer's domain knowledge with the environment's primary rewards. We evaluate our method's efficacy on a diverse set of tasks, from small-scale experiments to high-dimensional control challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-29T13:45:07Z)
• Automatic Intrinsic Reward Shaping for Exploration in Deep Reinforcement Learning [55.2080971216584]
  We present AIRS: Automatic Intrinsic Reward Shaping that intelligently and adaptively provides high-quality intrinsic rewards to enhance exploration in reinforcement learning (RL) We develop an intrinsic reward toolkit to provide efficient and reliable implementations of diverse intrinsic reward approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-26T01:06:46Z)
• On The Fragility of Learned Reward Functions [4.826574398803286]
  We study the causes of relearning failures in the domain of preference-based reward learning. Based on our findings, we emphasize the need for more retraining-based evaluations in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-09T19:45:38Z)
• Actively Learning Costly Reward Functions for Reinforcement Learning [56.34005280792013]
  We show that it is possible to train agents in complex real-world environments orders of magnitudes faster. By enabling the application of reinforcement learning methods to new domains, we show that we can find interesting and non-trivial solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-23T19:17:20Z)
• Unpacking Reward Shaping: Understanding the Benefits of Reward Engineering on Sample Complexity [114.88145406445483]
  Reinforcement learning provides an automated framework for learning behaviors from high-level reward specifications. In practice the choice of reward function can be crucial for good results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-18T04:21:25Z)
• Skill-Based Reinforcement Learning with Intrinsic Reward Matching [77.34726150561087]
  We present Intrinsic Reward Matching (IRM), which unifies task-agnostic skill pretraining and task-aware finetuning. IRM enables us to utilize pretrained skills far more effectively than previous skill selection methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T00:04:49Z)
• Basis for Intentions: Efficient Inverse Reinforcement Learning using Past Experience [89.30876995059168]
  inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) -- inferring the reward function of an agent from observing its behavior. This paper addresses the problem of IRL -- inferring the reward function of an agent from observing its behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-09T17:29:49Z)
• SURF: Semi-supervised Reward Learning with Data Augmentation for Feedback-efficient Preference-based Reinforcement Learning [168.89470249446023]
  We present SURF, a semi-supervised reward learning framework that utilizes a large amount of unlabeled samples with data augmentation. In order to leverage unlabeled samples for reward learning, we infer pseudo-labels of the unlabeled samples based on the confidence of the preference predictor. Our experiments demonstrate that our approach significantly improves the feedback-efficiency of the preference-based method on a variety of locomotion and robotic manipulation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-18T16:50:38Z)
• Hindsight Reward Tweaking via Conditional Deep Reinforcement Learning [37.61951923445689]
  We propose a novel paradigm for deep reinforcement learning to model the influences of reward functions within a near-optimal space. We demonstrate the feasibility of this approach and study one of its potential application in policy performance boosting with multiple MuJoCo tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-06T10:06:48Z)
• Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning with Delayed Rewards [16.914712720033524]
  In many real-world tasks, instant rewards are not readily accessible or defined immediately after the agent performs actions. In this work, we first formally define the environment with delayed rewards and discuss the challenges raised due to the non-Markovian nature of such environments. We introduce a general off-policy RL framework with a new Q-function formulation that can handle the delayed rewards with theoretical convergence guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-22T15:19:48Z)
• PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-training [94.87393610927812]
  We present an off-policy, interactive reinforcement learning algorithm that capitalizes on the strengths of both feedback and off-policy learning. We demonstrate that our approach is capable of learning tasks of higher complexity than previously considered by human-in-the-loop methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T14:10:50Z)
• Online reinforcement learning with sparse rewards through an active inference capsule [62.997667081978825]
  This paper introduces an active inference agent which minimizes the novel free energy of the expected future. Our model is capable of solving sparse-reward problems with a very high sample efficiency. We also introduce a novel method for approximating the prior model from the reward function, which simplifies the expression of complex objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-04T10:03:36Z)
• Outcome-Driven Reinforcement Learning via Variational Inference [95.82770132618862]
  We discuss a new perspective on reinforcement learning, recasting it as the problem of inferring actions that achieve desired outcomes, rather than a problem of maximizing rewards. To solve the resulting outcome-directed inference problem, we establish a novel variational inference formulation that allows us to derive a well-shaped reward function. We empirically demonstrate that this method eliminates the need to design reward functions and leads to effective goal-directed behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-20T18:16:21Z)
• Semi-supervised reward learning for offline reinforcement learning [71.6909757718301]
  Training agents usually requires reward functions, but rewards are seldom available in practice and their engineering is challenging and laborious. We propose semi-supervised learning algorithms that learn from limited annotations and incorporate unlabelled data. In our experiments with a simulated robotic arm, we greatly improve upon behavioural cloning and closely approach the performance achieved with ground truth rewards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-12T20:06:15Z)
• Self-Imitation Learning for Robot Tasks with Sparse and Delayed Rewards [1.2691047660244335]
  We propose a practical self-imitation learning method named Self-Imitation Learning with Constant Reward (SILCR) Our method assigns the immediate rewards at each timestep with constant values according to their final episodic rewards. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in some challenging continuous robotics control tasks in MuJoCo simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-14T11:12:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.