MobileSafetyBench: Evaluating Safety of Autonomous Agents in Mobile Device Control

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.17520v1
• Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 02:51:43 GMT
• Title: MobileSafetyBench: Evaluating Safety of Autonomous Agents in Mobile Device Control
• Authors: Juyong Lee, Dongyoon Hahm, June Suk Choi, W. Bradley Knox, Kimin Lee,
• Abstract summary: We introduce MobileSafetyBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate the safety of device-control agents. We develop a diverse set of tasks involving interactions with various mobile applications, including messaging and banking applications. Our experiments demonstrate that while baseline agents, based on state-of-the-art LLMs, perform well in executing helpful tasks, they show poor performance in safety tasks.
• Score: 20.796190000442053
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Autonomous agents powered by large language models (LLMs) show promising potential in assistive tasks across various domains, including mobile device control. As these agents interact directly with personal information and device settings, ensuring their safe and reliable behavior is crucial to prevent undesirable outcomes. However, no benchmark exists for standardized evaluation of the safety of mobile device-control agents. In this work, we introduce MobileSafetyBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate the safety of device-control agents within a realistic mobile environment based on Android emulators. We develop a diverse set of tasks involving interactions with various mobile applications, including messaging and banking applications. To clearly evaluate safety apart from general capabilities, we design separate tasks measuring safety and tasks evaluating helpfulness. The safety tasks challenge agents with managing potential risks prevalent in daily life and include tests to evaluate robustness against indirect prompt injections. Our experiments demonstrate that while baseline agents, based on state-of-the-art LLMs, perform well in executing helpful tasks, they show poor performance in safety tasks. To mitigate these safety concerns, we propose a prompting method that encourages agents to prioritize safety considerations. While this method shows promise in promoting safer behaviors, there is still considerable room for improvement to fully earn user trust. This highlights the urgent need for continued research to develop more robust safety mechanisms in mobile environments. We open-source our benchmark at: https://mobilesafetybench.github.io/.

Related papers

• Agent Safety Alignment via Reinforcement Learning [29.759393704688986]
  We propose the first unified safety-alignment framework for tool-using agents.<n>We introduce a tri-modal taxonomy, including benign, malicious, and sensitive for both user prompts and tool responses.<n>Our results show that safety and effectiveness can be jointly optimized.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-11T02:34:16Z)
• OpenAgentSafety: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Real-World AI Agent Safety [58.201189860217724]
  We introduce OpenAgentSafety, a comprehensive framework for evaluating agent behavior across eight critical risk categories.<n>Unlike prior work, our framework evaluates agents that interact with real tools, including web browsers, code execution environments, file systems, bash shells, and messaging platforms.<n>It combines rule-based analysis with LLM-as-judge assessments to detect both overt and subtle unsafe behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-08T16:18:54Z)
• AGENTSAFE: Benchmarking the Safety of Embodied Agents on Hazardous Instructions [76.74726258534142]
  We propose AGENTSAFE, the first benchmark for evaluating the safety of embodied VLM agents under hazardous instructions.<n> AGENTSAFE simulates realistic agent-environment interactions within a simulation sandbox.<n> benchmark includes 45 adversarial scenarios, 1,350 hazardous tasks, and 8,100 hazardous instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T16:37:35Z)
• LLM Agents Should Employ Security Principles [60.03651084139836]
  This paper argues that the well-established design principles in information security should be employed when deploying Large Language Model (LLM) agents at scale.<n>We introduce AgentSandbox, a conceptual framework embedding these security principles to provide safeguards throughout an agent's life-cycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T21:39:08Z)
• SafeAgent: Safeguarding LLM Agents via an Automated Risk Simulator [77.86600052899156]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents are increasingly deployed in real-world applications.<n>We propose AutoSafe, the first framework that systematically enhances agent safety through fully automated synthetic data generation.<n>We show that AutoSafe boosts safety scores by 45% on average and achieves a 28.91% improvement on real-world tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T10:56:06Z)
• AGrail: A Lifelong Agent Guardrail with Effective and Adaptive Safety Detection [47.83354878065321]
  We propose AGrail, a lifelong guardrail to enhance agent safety. AGrail features adaptive safety check generation, effective safety check optimization, and tool compatibility and flexibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T05:12:33Z)
• AgentGuard: Repurposing Agentic Orchestrator for Safety Evaluation of Tool Orchestration [0.3222802562733787]
  AgentGuard is a framework to autonomously discover and validate unsafe tool-use. It generates safety constraints to confine the behaviors of agents, achieving the baseline of safety guarantee. The framework operates through four phases: identifying unsafe, validating them in real-world execution, generating safety constraints, and validating constraint efficacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-13T23:00:33Z)
• Agent-SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of LLM Agents [72.92604341646691]
  We introduce Agent-SafetyBench, a comprehensive benchmark to evaluate the safety of large language models (LLMs) Agent-SafetyBench encompasses 349 interaction environments and 2,000 test cases, evaluating 8 categories of safety risks and covering 10 common failure modes frequently encountered in unsafe interactions. Our evaluation of 16 popular LLM agents reveals a concerning result: none of the agents achieves a safety score above 60%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T02:35:15Z)
• SafeAgentBench: A Benchmark for Safe Task Planning of Embodied LLM Agents [42.69984822098671]
  Existing benchmarks predominantly overlook critical safety risks, focusing solely on planning performance. We present SafeAgentBench-the first benchmark for safety-aware task planning of embodied LLM agents in interactive simulation environments. SafeAgentBench includes: (1) an executable, diverse, and high-quality dataset of 750 tasks, rigorously curated to cover 10 potential hazards and 3 task types; (2) SafeAgentEnv, a universal embodied environment with a low-level controller, supporting multi-agent execution with 17 high-level actions for 8 state-of-the-art baselines; and (3) reliable evaluation methods from both execution and semantic perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T18:55:58Z)
• ST-WebAgentBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Safety and Trustworthiness in Web Agents [3.09793323158304]
  We present ST-WebAgentBench, a new benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the safety and trustworthiness of web agents in enterprise contexts. This benchmark is grounded in a detailed framework that defines safe and trustworthy (ST) agent behavior. Our evaluation reveals that current SOTA agents struggle with policy adherence and cannot yet be relied upon for critical business applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T09:13:38Z)
• Multimodal Situational Safety [73.63981779844916]
  We present the first evaluation and analysis of a novel safety challenge termed Multimodal Situational Safety. For an MLLM to respond safely, whether through language or action, it often needs to assess the safety implications of a language query within its corresponding visual context. We develop the Multimodal Situational Safety benchmark (MSSBench) to assess the situational safety performance of current MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T16:16:07Z)
• Safeguarding AI Agents: Developing and Analyzing Safety Architectures [0.0]
  This paper addresses the need for safety measures in AI systems that collaborate with human teams. We propose and evaluate three frameworks to enhance safety protocols in AI agent systems. We conclude that these frameworks can significantly strengthen the safety and security of AI agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-03T10:14:51Z)
• Nothing in Excess: Mitigating the Exaggerated Safety for LLMs via Safety-Conscious Activation Steering [56.92068213969036]
  Safety alignment is indispensable for Large language models (LLMs) to defend threats from malicious instructions. Recent researches reveal safety-aligned LLMs prone to reject benign queries due to the exaggerated safety issue. We propose a Safety-Conscious Activation Steering (SCANS) method to mitigate the exaggerated safety concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T10:01:34Z)
• Athena: Safe Autonomous Agents with Verbal Contrastive Learning [3.102303947219617]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been utilized as language-based agents to perform a variety of tasks. In this study, we introduce the Athena framework which leverages the concept of verbal contrastive learning. The framework also incorporates a critiquing mechanism to guide the agent to prevent risky actions at every step.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T17:21:10Z)
• InferAct: Inferring Safe Actions for LLM-Based Agents Through Preemptive Evaluation and Human Feedback [70.54226917774933]
  This paper introduces InferAct, a novel approach to proactively detect potential errors before risky actions are executed. InferAct acts as a human proxy, detecting unsafe actions and alerting users for intervention. Experiments on three widely-used tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of InferAct.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T15:24:44Z)
• TrustAgent: Towards Safe and Trustworthy LLM-based Agents [50.33549510615024]
  This paper presents an Agent-Constitution-based agent framework, TrustAgent, with a focus on improving the LLM-based agent safety. The proposed framework ensures strict adherence to the Agent Constitution through three strategic components: pre-planning strategy which injects safety knowledge to the model before plan generation, in-planning strategy which enhances safety during plan generation, and post-planning strategy which ensures safety by post-planning inspection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T17:26:23Z)
• On Prompt-Driven Safeguarding for Large Language Models [172.13943777203377]
  We find that in the representation space, the input queries are typically moved by safety prompts in a "higher-refusal" direction. Inspired by these findings, we propose a method for safety prompt optimization, namely DRO. Treating a safety prompt as continuous, trainable embeddings, DRO learns to move the queries' representations along or opposite the refusal direction, depending on their harmfulness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-31T17:28:24Z)
• Testing Language Model Agents Safely in the Wild [19.507292491433738]
  We propose a framework for conducting safe autonomous agent tests on the open internet. Agent actions are audited by a context-sensitive monitor that enforces a stringent safety boundary. Using an adversarial simulated agent, we measure its ability to identify and stop unsafe situations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-17T14:06:05Z)
• Safety-Gymnasium: A Unified Safe Reinforcement Learning Benchmark [12.660770759420286]
  We present an environment suite called Safety-Gymnasium, which encompasses safety-critical tasks in both single and multi-agent scenarios. We offer a library of algorithms named Safe Policy Optimization (SafePO), comprising 16 state-of-the-art SafeRL algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T08:19:28Z)
• Safety Margins for Reinforcement Learning [53.10194953873209]
  We show how to leverage proxy criticality metrics to generate safety margins. We evaluate our approach on learned policies from APE-X and A3C within an Atari environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T16:49:54Z)
• Safe Reinforcement Learning via Curriculum Induction [94.67835258431202]
  In safety-critical applications, autonomous agents may need to learn in an environment where mistakes can be very costly. Existing safe reinforcement learning methods make an agent rely on priors that let it avoid dangerous situations. This paper presents an alternative approach inspired by human teaching, where an agent learns under the supervision of an automatic instructor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T10:48:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.