Adaptive Alignment: Dynamic Preference Adjustments via Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning for Pluralistic AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.23630v1
• Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 04:46:52 GMT
• Title: Adaptive Alignment: Dynamic Preference Adjustments via Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning for Pluralistic AI
• Authors: Hadassah Harland, Richard Dazeley, Peter Vamplew, Hashini Senaratne, Bahareh Nakisa, Francisco Cruz,
• Abstract summary: We propose an approach for aligning AI with diverse and shifting user preferences through Multi Objective Reinforcement Learning (MORL) In this paper, we introduce the proposed framework for this approach, outline its anticipated advantages and assumptions, and discuss technical details about the implementation.
• Score: 4.80825466957272
• License:
• Abstract: Emerging research in Pluralistic Artificial Intelligence (AI) alignment seeks to address how intelligent systems can be designed and deployed in accordance with diverse human needs and values. We contribute to this pursuit with a dynamic approach for aligning AI with diverse and shifting user preferences through Multi Objective Reinforcement Learning (MORL), via post-learning policy selection adjustment. In this paper, we introduce the proposed framework for this approach, outline its anticipated advantages and assumptions, and discuss technical details about the implementation. We also examine the broader implications of adopting a retroactive alignment approach through the sociotechnical systems perspective.

Related papers

• Beyond Algorithmic Fairness: A Guide to Develop and Deploy Ethical AI-Enabled Decision-Support Tools [0.0]
  The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and optimization hold substantial promise for improving the efficiency, reliability, and resilience of engineered systems. This paper identifies ethical considerations required when deploying algorithms at the intersection of AI and optimization. Rather than providing a prescriptive set of rules, this paper aims to foster reflection and awareness among researchers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T18:37:53Z)
• Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment: A Systematic Review for Clarifications, Framework, and Future Directions [101.67121669727354]
  Recent advancements in AI have highlighted the importance of guiding AI systems towards the intended goals, ethical principles, and values of individuals and groups, a concept broadly recognized as alignment. The lack of clarified definitions and scopes of human-AI alignment poses a significant obstacle, hampering collaborative efforts across research domains to achieve this alignment. We introduce a systematic review of over 400 papers published between 2019 and January 2024, spanning multiple domains such as Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), Machine Learning (ML)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T16:03:25Z)
• Enhancing Decision-Making in Optimization through LLM-Assisted Inference: A Neural Networks Perspective [1.0420394952839245]
  This paper explores the seamless integration of Generative AI (GenAI) and Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) Focusing on the transformative role of Large Language Models (LLMs), our study investigates the potential of LLM-Assisted Inference to automate and enhance decision-making processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-12T08:22:53Z)
• Controllable Preference Optimization: Toward Controllable Multi-Objective Alignment [103.12563033438715]
  Alignment in artificial intelligence pursues consistency between model responses and human preferences as well as values. Existing alignment techniques are mostly unidirectional, leading to suboptimal trade-offs and poor flexibility over various objectives. We introduce controllable preference optimization (CPO), which explicitly specifies preference scores for different objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T12:12:30Z)
• Machine Learning Insides OptVerse AI Solver: Design Principles and Applications [74.67495900436728]
  We present a comprehensive study on the integration of machine learning (ML) techniques into Huawei Cloud's OptVerse AI solver. We showcase our methods for generating complex SAT and MILP instances utilizing generative models that mirror multifaceted structures of real-world problem. We detail the incorporation of state-of-the-art parameter tuning algorithms which markedly elevate solver performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-11T15:02:15Z)
• A Vision for Operationalising Diversity and Inclusion in AI [5.4897262701261225]
  This study seeks to envision the operationalization of the ethical imperatives of diversity and inclusion (D&I) within AI ecosystems. A significant challenge in AI development is the effective operationalization of D&I principles. This paper proposes a vision of a framework for developing a tool utilizing persona-based simulation by Generative AI (GenAI)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-11T02:44:39Z)
• Multimodality of AI for Education: Towards Artificial General Intelligence [14.121655991753483]
  multimodal artificial intelligence (AI) approaches are paving the way towards the realization of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) in educational contexts. This research delves deeply into the key facets of AGI, including cognitive frameworks, advanced knowledge representation, adaptive learning mechanisms, and the integration of diverse multimodal data sources. The paper also discusses the implications of multimodal AI's role in education, offering insights into future directions and challenges in AGI development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-10T23:32:55Z)
• Recommender Systems in the Era of Large Language Models (LLMs) [62.0129013439038]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized the fields of Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) We conduct a comprehensive review of LLM-empowered recommender systems from various aspects including Pre-training, Fine-tuning, and Prompting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-05T06:03:40Z)
• Acceleration in Policy Optimization [50.323182853069184]
  We work towards a unifying paradigm for accelerating policy optimization methods in reinforcement learning (RL) by integrating foresight in the policy improvement step via optimistic and adaptive updates. We define optimism as predictive modelling of the future behavior of a policy, and adaptivity as taking immediate and anticipatory corrective actions to mitigate errors from overshooting predictions or delayed responses to change. We design an optimistic policy gradient algorithm, adaptive via meta-gradient learning, and empirically highlight several design choices pertaining to acceleration, in an illustrative task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-18T15:50:57Z)
• Methodological reflections for AI alignment research using human feedback [0.0]
  AI alignment aims to investigate whether AI technologies align with human interests and values and function in a safe and ethical manner. LLMs have the potential to exhibit unintended behavior due to their ability to learn and adapt in ways that are difficult to predict.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-22T14:27:33Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.