ROADFIRST: A Comprehensive Enhancement of the Systemic Approach to Safety for Improved Risk Factor Identification and Evaluation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.00821v1
• Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 20:27:45 GMT
• Title: ROADFIRST: A Comprehensive Enhancement of the Systemic Approach to Safety for Improved Risk Factor Identification and Evaluation
• Authors: Shriyan Reyya, Yao Cheng,
• Abstract summary: We develop an enhanced process, ROADFIRST, that allows users to identify potential crash types and contributing factors at any location. We identify and rank features impacting the likelihood of three sample contributing factors, namely alcohol-impaired driving, distracted driving, and speeding, according to crash and road inventory data from North Carolina.
• Score: 2.710150409047222
• License:
• Abstract: Many agencies have adopted the FHWA-recommended systemic approach to traffic safety, an essential supplement to the traditional hotspot crash analysis which develops region-wide safety projects based on identified risk factors. However, this approach narrows analysis to specific crash and facility types. This specification causes inefficient use of crash and inventory data as well as non-comprehensive risk evaluation and countermeasure selection for each location. To improve the comprehensiveness of the systemic approach to safety, we develop an enhanced process, ROADFIRST, that allows users to identify potential crash types and contributing factors at any location. As the knowledge base for such a process, crash types and contributing factors are analyzed with respect to features of interest, including both dynamic and static traffic-related features, using Random Forest and analyzed with the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis. We identify and rank features impacting the likelihood of three sample contributing factors, namely alcohol-impaired driving, distracted driving, and speeding, according to crash and road inventory data from North Carolina, and quantify state-wide road segment risk for each contributing factor. The introduced models and methods serve as a sample for the further development of ROADFIRST by state and local agencies, which benefits the planning of more comprehensive region-wide safety improvement projects.

Related papers

• Traffic and Safety Rule Compliance of Humans in Diverse Driving Situations [48.924085579865334]
  Analyzing human data is crucial for developing autonomous systems that replicate safe driving practices. This paper presents a comparative evaluation of human compliance with traffic and safety rules across multiple trajectory prediction datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T09:21:00Z)
• An Explainable Machine Learning Approach to Traffic Accident Fatality Prediction [0.02730969268472861]
  Road traffic accidents pose a significant public health threat worldwide. This study presents a machine learning-based approach for classifying fatal and non-fatal road accident outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-18T12:41:56Z)
• Risk-Aware Vehicle Trajectory Prediction Under Safety-Critical Scenarios [25.16311876790003]
  This paper proposes a risk-aware trajectory prediction framework tailored to safety-critical scenarios. We introduce a safety-critical trajectory prediction dataset and tailored evaluation metrics. Results demonstrate the superior performance of our model, with a significant improvement in most metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T13:00:01Z)
• Learning Traffic Crashes as Language: Datasets, Benchmarks, and What-if Causal Analyses [76.59021017301127]
  We propose a large-scale traffic crash language dataset, named CrashEvent, summarizing 19,340 real-world crash reports. We further formulate the crash event feature learning as a novel text reasoning problem and further fine-tune various large language models (LLMs) to predict detailed accident outcomes. Our experiments results show that our LLM-based approach not only predicts the severity of accidents but also classifies different types of accidents and predicts injury outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T03:10:16Z)
• A Real-time Evaluation Framework for Pedestrian's Potential Risk at Non-Signalized Intersections Based on Predicted Post-Encroachment Time [1.0124625066746595]
  In this study, a framework with computer vision technologies and predictive models is developed to evaluate the potential risk of pedestrians in real time. Initiative is the Predicted Post-Encroachment Time (P-PET), derived from deep learning models capable to predict the arrival time of pedestrians and vehicles at intersections.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T04:10:05Z)
• Safeguarded Progress in Reinforcement Learning: Safe Bayesian Exploration for Control Policy Synthesis [63.532413807686524]
  This paper addresses the problem of maintaining safety during training in Reinforcement Learning (RL) We propose a new architecture that handles the trade-off between efficient progress and safety during exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-18T16:09:43Z)
• A Counterfactual Safety Margin Perspective on the Scoring of Autonomous Vehicles' Riskiness [52.27309191283943]
  This paper presents a data-driven framework for assessing the risk of different AVs' behaviors. We propose the notion of counterfactual safety margin, which represents the minimum deviation from nominal behavior that could cause a collision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-02T09:48:08Z)
• Evaluating Model-free Reinforcement Learning toward Safety-critical Tasks [70.76757529955577]
  This paper revisits prior work in this scope from the perspective of state-wise safe RL. We propose Unrolling Safety Layer (USL), a joint method that combines safety optimization and safety projection. To facilitate further research in this area, we reproduce related algorithms in a unified pipeline and incorporate them into SafeRL-Kit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-12T06:30:17Z)
• Analyzing vehicle pedestrian interactions combining data cube structure and predictive collision risk estimation model [5.73658856166614]
  This study introduces a new concept of a pedestrian safety system that combines the field and the centralized processes. The system can warn of upcoming risks immediately in the field and improve the safety of risk frequent areas by assessing the safety levels of roads without actual collisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-26T23:00:56Z)
• Impact of risk factors on work zone crashes using logistic models and Random Forest [9.5148976460603]
  This study focuses on the 2016 severe crashes that occurred in the State of Michigan (USA) in work zones along highway I-94. The study identified the risk factors from a wide range of crash variables characterizing environmental, driver, crash and road-related variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-14T00:27:11Z)
• Cautious Adaptation For Reinforcement Learning in Safety-Critical Settings [129.80279257258098]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) in real-world safety-critical target settings like urban driving is hazardous. We propose a "safety-critical adaptation" task setting: an agent first trains in non-safety-critical "source" environments. We propose a solution approach, CARL, that builds on the intuition that prior experience in diverse environments equips an agent to estimate risk.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-15T01:40:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.