Online Moderation in Competitive Action Games: How Intervention Affects Player Behaviors
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.01057v1
- Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2024 22:01:25 GMT
- Title: Online Moderation in Competitive Action Games: How Intervention Affects Player Behaviors
- Authors: Zhuofang Li, Rafal Kocielnik, Mitchell Linegar, Deshawn Sambrano, Fereshteh Soltani, Min Kim, Nabiha Naqvie, Grant Cahill, Animashree Anandkumar, R. Michael Alvarez,
- Abstract summary: This study delves into the under-explored realm of understanding the effects of moderation on player behavior within online gaming.
We employ a quasi-experimental design and causal inference techniques to examine the impact of moderation in a real-world industry-scale moderation system.
Our findings uncover the dual impact moderation has on reducing disruptive behavior and discouraging disruptive players from participating.
- Score: 40.395860809162265
- License:
- Abstract: Online competitive action games have flourished as a space for entertainment and social connections, yet they face challenges from a small percentage of players engaging in disruptive behaviors. This study delves into the under-explored realm of understanding the effects of moderation on player behavior within online gaming on an example of a popular title - Call of Duty(R): Modern Warfare(R)II. We employ a quasi-experimental design and causal inference techniques to examine the impact of moderation in a real-world industry-scale moderation system. We further delve into novel aspects around the impact of delayed moderation, as well as the severity of applied punishment. We examine these effects on a set of four disruptive behaviors including cheating, offensive user name, chat, and voice. Our findings uncover the dual impact moderation has on reducing disruptive behavior and discouraging disruptive players from participating. We further uncover differences in the effectiveness of quick and delayed moderation and the varying severity of punishment. Our examination of real-world gaming interactions sets a precedent in understanding the effectiveness of moderation and its impact on player behavior. Our insights offer actionable suggestions for the most promising avenues for improving real-world moderation practices, as well as the heterogeneous impact moderation has on indifferent players.
Related papers
- Uncovering the Viral Nature of Toxicity in Competitive Online Video Games [0.4681661603096334]
We analyze proprietary data from the free-to-play first-person action game Call of Duty: Warzone.
All of a player's teammates engaging in toxic speech increases their probability of engaging in similar behavior by 26.1 to 30.3 times the average player's likelihood of engaging in toxic speech.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-01T18:07:06Z) - Challenges for Real-Time Toxicity Detection in Online Games [1.2289361708127877]
Toxic behaviour and malicious players can ruin the experience, reduce the player base and potentially harm the success of the game and the studio.
This article will give a brief overview of the challenges faced in toxic content detection in terms of text, audio and image processing problems, and behavioural toxicity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-05T09:38:58Z) - The Importance of Multimodal Emotion Conditioning and Affect Consistency
for Embodied Conversational Agents [12.102955731466457]
We propose a conceptual framework that aims to increase the perception of affects by generating multimodal behaviors conditioned on a consistent driving affect.
Our statistical analysis suggests that making a modality affect-inconsistent significantly decreases the perception of driving affects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-26T23:41:56Z) - Game-theoretic Objective Space Planning [4.989480853499916]
Understanding intent of other agents is crucial to deploying autonomous systems in adversarial multi-agent environments.
Current approaches either oversimplify the discretization of the action space of agents or fail to recognize the long-term effect of actions and become myopic.
We propose a novel dimension reduction method that encapsulates diverse agent behaviors while conserving the continuity of agent actions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-16T07:35:20Z) - Incorporating Rivalry in Reinforcement Learning for a Competitive Game [65.2200847818153]
This work proposes a novel reinforcement learning mechanism based on the social impact of rivalry behavior.
Our proposed model aggregates objective and social perception mechanisms to derive a rivalry score that is used to modulate the learning of artificial agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-22T14:06:06Z) - Aligning to Social Norms and Values in Interactive Narratives [89.82264844526333]
We focus on creating agents that act in alignment with socially beneficial norms and values in interactive narratives or text-based games.
We introduce the GALAD agent that uses the social commonsense knowledge present in specially trained language models to contextually restrict its action space to only those actions that are aligned with socially beneficial values.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-04T09:54:33Z) - Disturbing Reinforcement Learning Agents with Corrupted Rewards [62.997667081978825]
We analyze the effects of different attack strategies based on reward perturbations on reinforcement learning algorithms.
We show that smoothly crafting adversarial rewards are able to mislead the learner, and that using low exploration probability values, the policy learned is more robust to corrupt rewards.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-12T15:53:48Z) - Challenges for Using Impact Regularizers to Avoid Negative Side Effects [74.67972013102462]
We discuss the main current challenges of impact regularizers and relate them to fundamental design decisions.
We explore promising directions to overcome the unsolved challenges in preventing negative side effects with impact regularizers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-29T10:32:51Z) - Moody Learners -- Explaining Competitive Behaviour of Reinforcement
Learning Agents [65.2200847818153]
In a competitive scenario, the agent does not only have a dynamic environment but also is directly affected by the opponents' actions.
Observing the Q-values of the agent is usually a way of explaining its behavior, however, do not show the temporal-relation between the selected actions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-30T11:30:42Z) - Cheating in online gaming spreads through observation and victimization [2.7739004171676904]
We study the spread of cheating in more than a million matches of an online multiplayer first-person shooter game.
We find that social contagion is only likely to exist for those who both observe and experience cheating.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-24T22:38:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.