Can Large Language Model Predict Employee Attrition?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.01353v1
- Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2024 19:50:39 GMT
- Title: Can Large Language Model Predict Employee Attrition?
- Authors: Xiaoye Ma, Weiheng Liu, Changyi Zhao, Liliya R. Tukhvatulina,
- Abstract summary: This study compares the predictive accuracy and interpretability of a fine-tuned GPT-3.5 model against traditional machine learning (ML)
Our findings show that the fine-tuned GPT-3.5 model outperforms traditional methods with a precision of 0.91, recall of 0.94, and an F1-score of 0.92, while the best traditional model, SVM, achieved an F1-score of 0.82, with Random Forest and XGBoost reaching 0.80.
- Score: 0.0
- License:
- Abstract: Employee attrition poses significant costs for organizations, with traditional statistical prediction methods often struggling to capture modern workforce complexities. Machine learning (ML) advancements offer more scalable and accurate solutions, but large language models (LLMs) introduce new potential in human resource management by interpreting nuanced employee communication and detecting subtle turnover cues. This study leverages the IBM HR Analytics Attrition dataset to compare the predictive accuracy and interpretability of a fine-tuned GPT-3.5 model against traditional ML classifiers, including Logistic Regression, k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree, Random Forest, AdaBoost, and XGBoost. While traditional models are easier to use and interpret, LLMs can reveal deeper patterns in employee behavior. Our findings show that the fine-tuned GPT-3.5 model outperforms traditional methods with a precision of 0.91, recall of 0.94, and an F1-score of 0.92, while the best traditional model, SVM, achieved an F1-score of 0.82, with Random Forest and XGBoost reaching 0.80. These results highlight GPT-3.5's ability to capture complex patterns in attrition risk, offering organizations improved insights for retention strategies and underscoring the value of LLMs in HR applications.
Related papers
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of XAI Techniques for Encoder-Based Language Models [6.349503549199403]
This study presents a general evaluation framework using four key metrics: Human-reasoning Agreement (HA), Robustness, Consistency, and Contrastivity.
We assess the effectiveness of six explainability techniques from five different XAI categories.
Our findings show that the model simplification-based XAI method (LIME) consistently outperforms across multiple metrics and models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-26T03:08:34Z) - What Do Learning Dynamics Reveal About Generalization in LLM Reasoning? [83.83230167222852]
We find that a model's generalization behavior can be effectively characterized by a training metric we call pre-memorization train accuracy.
By connecting a model's learning behavior to its generalization, pre-memorization train accuracy can guide targeted improvements to training strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-12T09:52:40Z) - Enhancing Retail Sales Forecasting with Optimized Machine Learning Models [0.0]
In retail sales forecasting, accurately predicting future sales is crucial for inventory management and strategic planning.
Recent advancements in machine learning (ML) provide more robust alternatives.
This research benefits from the power of ML, particularly Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting (GB), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and XGBoost.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-17T17:11:33Z) - Scaling Laws for Predicting Downstream Performance in LLMs [75.28559015477137]
This work focuses on the pre-training loss as a more-efficient metric for performance estimation.
We extend the power law analytical function to predict domain-specific pre-training loss based on FLOPs across data sources.
We employ a two-layer neural network to model the non-linear relationship between multiple domain-specific loss and downstream performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-11T04:57:48Z) - Accelerating Large Language Model Pretraining via LFR Pedagogy: Learn, Focus, and Review [50.78587571704713]
Learn-Focus-Review (LFR) is a dynamic training approach that adapts to the model's learning progress.
LFR tracks the model's learning performance across data blocks (sequences of tokens) and prioritizes revisiting challenging regions of the dataset.
Compared to baseline models trained on the full datasets, LFR consistently achieved lower perplexity and higher accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-10T00:59:18Z) - Scaling Relationship on Learning Mathematical Reasoning with Large
Language Models [75.29595679428105]
We investigate how the pre-training loss, supervised data amount, and augmented data amount influence the reasoning performances of a supervised LLM.
We find that rejection samples from multiple models push LLaMA-7B to an accuracy of 49.3% on GSM8K which outperforms the supervised fine-tuning (SFT) accuracy of 35.9% significantly.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-03T15:34:01Z) - Chain-of-Thought Hub: A Continuous Effort to Measure Large Language
Models' Reasoning Performance [35.38549845444575]
Chain-of-Thought Hub is an open-source evaluation suite on the multi-step reasoning capabilities of large language models.
This work proposes Chain-of-Thought Hub, an open-source evaluation suite on the multi-step reasoning capabilities of large language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-26T23:46:42Z) - Prompting GPT-3 To Be Reliable [117.23966502293796]
This work decomposes reliability into four facets: generalizability, fairness, calibration, and factuality.
We find that GPT-3 outperforms smaller-scale supervised models by large margins on all these facets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-17T14:52:39Z) - Cauchy-Schwarz Regularized Autoencoder [68.80569889599434]
Variational autoencoders (VAE) are a powerful and widely-used class of generative models.
We introduce a new constrained objective based on the Cauchy-Schwarz divergence, which can be computed analytically for GMMs.
Our objective improves upon variational auto-encoding models in density estimation, unsupervised clustering, semi-supervised learning, and face analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-06T17:36:26Z) - Surrogate Locally-Interpretable Models with Supervised Machine Learning
Algorithms [8.949704905866888]
Supervised Machine Learning algorithms have become popular in recent years due to their superior predictive performance over traditional statistical methods.
The main focus is on interpretability, the resulting surrogate model also has reasonably good predictive performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-28T23:46:16Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.